1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is if the adversary controls an appreciable portion of all issued currency and/or also controls enough computers (via the OS, or the hardware, or both). They could root every computer on earth and have it accept their changes to the blockchain.

0
Wexit-Delecto 0 points ago +1 / -1

Most VPN companies are re-using open source VPN code and charging for access to their servers. The VPN software in question has been used in many pieces of software including various linux flavours for 20 years.

Gold and silver haven't taken off primarily because of the EFT scam in which gold and silver EFTs are traded as if they're interchangeable with gold and silver, even though the number of such 1 oz EFTs outnumbers extant ounces of gold and silver by 100x-300x. It has acted as an apparent inflation of the supply of these metals. However, following 2008 that wasn't enough to keep people off of gold and silver so they printed trillions and awarded them to the big banks to, in part, suppress the price of the metals further and, while prices were down, they released crypto, which has since been diverting demand for gold and silver.

If they didn't want people buying crypto, they'd print money to drive its price down as they've been doing with gold and silver. If people think there are no gains to be had, they won't invest.

God has nothing to do with crypto, it's a man made software running on man made machines. "In God we trust" refers to the fact that there's no one and no thing on earth we can trust to limit the quantity of money. Only God, who determined how much precious metal there is, can be trusted with such a task.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure why any of the above says to you "bad actors can't hide something in the code." They recently found a 20 year old vulnerability in almost every single implementation of VPN software, and most VPN implementations are ~4,000-10,000 lines of code. This is far from an isolated finding. Small pieces of commonly used open source code are regularly found to have had long-standing vulnerabilities. Why would cryptocurrency software be any different, especially given the stakes?

The Cabal doesn’t write software to subvert their control

Cryptocurrency has not and will never subvert their control. It was released at exactly the time the cabal needed people to lay off gold and silver, and it worked, expertly diverting demand from real scarce money off into digital tokens.

So you just keep on trusting your Cabal fiat dollars, the bank’s closed software platforms, cabal-hardware, and the Cabal’s suppression of the money markets

In God I trust, which means gold and silver. Not fiat.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what gold and silver stand for. After all, the last time we were free, we used gold and silver as money.

Crypto is the cabal's response to the price of gold and silver climbing unacceptably after the 2008 financial crisis. They needed something to soak up the demand.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does not China dominate holdings? They're the only ones who don't have to pay for their electricity.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disagree, silver is by and large in the possession of the people.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Re your last line, I grant you gold is dominated by bad guys like the cabal, not to mention Ivan and the slants. If we acknowledge gold is money again, we're acknowledging that these parties are richer than we will ever be. Which is why I think the gold standard is a red herring, and the real peoples' money is silver.

0
Wexit-Delecto 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yet they keep finding disastrous zero day flaws in OSS, as they do for commercial software. Likely half of them were intentionally placed by cabal-controlled coders.

You go ahead and trust your cabal-written software running on a cabal-written OS, running on cabal-made hardware, depending on encryption algorithms the cabal gave us for free and out of the goodness of their hearts (and not to eavesdrop on all traffic encrypted with these algorithms, not at all), and transmitting messages across an internet which the cabal completely controls.

As for me, I'm going to continue burying shiny and trusting in God.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't have to be changed. You can rest assured there are dozens of fatal flaws baked right into the software, right now.

There isn't a single piece of software on earth you can trust. With metal money, one need only trust in God.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +2 / -1

Intelligence agencies slip backdoors and compromises into oss all the time. Sometimes it lies hidden in the code for decades, probably being exploited all the while. There isn’t a piece of software on earth you can trust. Plus they also make ALLLLL the hardware, which you also cannot trust.

0
Wexit-Delecto 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is no need to audit gold supplies. Metal coinage is money, nothing else.

7
Wexit-Delecto 7 points ago +7 / -0

Gold is gold-backed. Hold the computer bullshit.

9
Wexit-Delecto 9 points ago +10 / -1

There isn’t a computer on earth you can trust.

2
Wexit-Delecto 2 points ago +4 / -2

It stands for diverting demand away from gold and silver.

6
Wexit-Delecto 6 points ago +7 / -1

This comment was well received on T_D and so here it is again.

It looks like a dude eating the ass out of a moose.

4
Wexit-Delecto 4 points ago +4 / -0

Operation Trust lured Russian patriots into attacking the communists before the patriots were ready. The Russian patriots were thus identified and dealt with. This is not analogous to our situation. We already lived under a decade or more of complete and comprehensive surveillance. The adversary already knew who all of us were long before Q started posting.

Then they go "yeah but Q was designed to pacify you." This also makes no sense. Q supporters are 5% of Trump supporters, tops. If they want a revolution right now, they could have one without us being involved at all.

Of course, if they need us to kick off their revolution, then who the fuck are they to tell us when it starts?

The "Operation Trust" argument goes nowhere either way.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

My neighbour has cows and I feel bad eating them sometimes. When we go over there the same few cows always recognize my kids and walk over to be fed grass and petted on the nose by them.

2
Wexit-Delecto 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am. I’m permanently furious about it and I keep loudly asking people in public “do you remember how retarded everyone got over a flu” and such. Until people hang for it, justice has not been done.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

He produced a firearm because a bunch of people rushed him from behind a closed door without announcing who they were or what they were doing. Police definitely do this, here are two examples from where I am, and this is far from an exhaustive list:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/umar-zameer-verdict-1.7180011

^cops accost a guy in a parking garage when he’s with his family but don’t announce who they are, he runs one of them over trying to get away

https://globalnews.ca/news/8666734/family-of-norfolk-county-gunsmith-disappointed-with-siu/

^cops bust into a guy’s gun shop without uniforms or announcing who they are and shoot the gunsmith dead for reacting like it’s a robbery

In both cases the civilian had actually committed no crime.

There is a lot of blue dickriding in this sub. It’s as if covid never happened to you people. They will follow ANY order for the pension.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m aware we would never do this. But that doesn’t mean police wouldn’t come for us. Does 1/6 ring a bell?

I don’t think he was brandishing the gun, he went for it because he was being attacked and before he could clear leather body cam #3 unloaded a mag into his crotch.

view more: Next ›