1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Naturally, that would be ideal. Without a doubt, the legal system would be tested to its breaking point. I feel like this is where beanie-man's prediction of civil war really starts to become a possibility.

People would lose their minds.

5
WhoReallyRunsThis 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, I agree with that/those statements. However, the Presidential Succession act of 1947 dictates what should happen in the event:

The president of the United States may be replaced if he or she:

  • Becomes incapacitated
  • Dies
  • Resigns
  • Is unable to hold office
  • Is removed from office

And that would be to transition to VP, then speaker of the house, and so on. The only way, as I see it, to go through this process and stop Trump is to nullify the 2020 election, and correct it to show DJT as the elected president. Under section 1 of the 22nd Amendment, it directly states that a president can't be elected to more than two terms. But in the event that you take over, for longer than 2 years == you can only be elected once (that would be truly elected, so one more time, either before, or after the term you took over). If for shorter than 2 years, then you can be elected not more than two times.

Again, I think they will state that Trump was already elected twice... but that's just my crazy theory.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keep in mind - the 22nd Amendment simply states the following:

"Section 1 No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

The second-half of that section really seems to govern someone taking over mid-term due to the failure of the elected president to fulfill the term. The first part of the statement is where I see it applying: If they turn around and say, "Yeah, you know what, we reviewed all of the evidence, and you're right, all of these states violated their constitutions (PA, GA, WI, etc), and thus, those votes were invalid. Therefore DJT is the duly elected President for a second time."

Trust me, I think it's a pretty dangerous threshold for them to cross, but we've all seen crazier things over the past 3 years...vax your toddlers, Trump won't have enough ventilators (and everyone is going to die because of it... yet ventilators were blowing people's lungs out), 10 days to stop the spread, stop taking horse paste "ya'll"... the list goes on.

23
WhoReallyRunsThis 23 points ago +24 / -1

Check my history, it’s been a thought of mine for quite some time… the late stage support from otherwise silent groups is fairly clear.

The later we get into the election cycle, and the realization that he is not only the nominee, but the frontrunner, they will admit the ultimate to make a final legal stand that he can’t be president. They’d rather say he’s the 46th president and let him serve a day in the white house since the damage of a full Biden term has already been done.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check my history, but here’s been my thought for quite some time:

As a LAST RESORT, they will push efforts like this to show that Trump actually did win, and overturn the election, making him the 46th president, and thus, making him ineligible for a third term.

The amount of turmoil over the fact that he indeed won means that it would have to be a last resort, but an ultimate sacrifice that they would make in order to keep him from the White House. The damage will have been done… Biden has already essentially served a full term, so it’s really an insignificant sacrifice for them at this point. Then they’ll try to install their warmonger, either a dem, or a dem in disguise like Haley.

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the correct answer.

The people's "weights" don't seem off to me, either. Having been on many cruise ships at sea, and the wind in the mic, it seemed fairly natural to me as being on the top deck going against the wind.

Sure, some things are faked, but I don't think this is one of them. Staged maybe, but not computer graphics.

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't believe any of it. Remember 2016?

Flashback: everyone thought it was going to be a number of different folks. Pence seemingly was picked out of nowhere and I remember thinking, who the f is Mike pence??

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve always wondered if they would eventually overturn the election, with like a month left, so they could turn around and say that he couldn’t serve a third term under the constitution. Essentially as a last resort.

This would line up.

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Only after cleaning them. With bleachbit. Like a cloth or something?

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone is talking about Q being the Q we think of... It actually makes more sense, given the Sam Altman news lately, and his supposed firing over their new AI model called Q*.

Elon has been at odds with Sam Altman, so this makes more sense than trying to say he found the true Q imho.

Link, if anyone wants more info.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

You look like a cloooon, but you're not a clooooooon.

5
WhoReallyRunsThis 5 points ago +5 / -0

This. Everyone talks a big game, but even when hauled into a congressional meeting, it's tough questions that get vague responses, then the other side of the aisle gets to push their propaganda and obfuscate...

Nothing ever comes from those, IMHO.

And that goes for both sides...they both play the game.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

"was believed to be cocaine hydrochloride, a hazardous material that is often used as a local anesthetic."

LOL, k. So nummies and the nasal highs are just considered "local anesthetics" now...

-1
WhoReallyRunsThis -1 points ago +2 / -3

When date fagging isn’t enough… just drop the date and be fagging.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unvaxxed here, so don't shoot me... but not sure that I like this study.

If you are a Healthcare worker, as time goes on and more (moving towards 100% of working Healthcare workers), were forced to vaccinate, wouldn't there be a much larger pool of potential covid victims? Seems more correlation vs causation here.

The real story is that the Vax didn't do shit, and most likely causes disruption of the immune system, therefore cancer risk increases, etc. But I don't think it necessarily created a magnet for infection.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +4 / -1

How did you even manage to stumble upon such an obscure sports site that no one has ever heard of and breaks that kind of news?

Any other source?

11
WhoReallyRunsThis 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is from a while back. Clips have been posted for at least a couple of weeks or more.

8
WhoReallyRunsThis 8 points ago +8 / -0

Came here for this… overjoyed that that thing got its ass kicked, always worried that this will be the event that is used as an example for wHy ShE cAn CoMpEtE wItH tHe WoMaN.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve seen the supposed still images, with the stitching across the face, a before picture of her, and some random photos of a face peeled back, torso opened up, etc.

But nothing to indicate that this was frazzledrip, let alone, huma and killary.

5
WhoReallyRunsThis 5 points ago +5 / -0

About two years ago, I searched far and wide, dark and deep, and was unable to find anything that resembled frazzledrip. I decoded kappy files, worked on WL insurance 1, 2, and 3; went to the darkest places on the net in search of something. Found a bunch of ugly stuff, but nothing.

Whenever I hear someone say, don’t go searching, I’ve seen it… I have to call bs.

7
WhoReallyRunsThis 7 points ago +7 / -0

You're getting downvoted, but it's okay for me to think Trump is the best president in my lifetime, but ALSO not agree with his push of the vax.

I can recall many times watching his speeches where he would actively encourage to go out and get vaccinated... so when I saw this post (and him going after desanctimonious for the vax), it doesn't seem like a good strategy.

Sorry that you're getting downvoted, but I agree with you - I see a lot of confirmation bias in the thread here, dismissing or kind of covering for Trump on this topic... We are allowed to disagree with Trump or any other elected official on topics - anything else is sheepish and no better than the left's blind-eye of justice (not that I'm calling for justice against trump here - I think there is a meaningful argument to be made about fraud from the vax companies and/or DOJ in the creation of this mess).

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tom Fitton better watch his back...

Supply and demand on schmediums is going to hit him hard.

view more: Next ›