7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +8 / -1

Just here to say that there are a lot of people who claim to be anti war cheering on any attack Israel makes, it's really weird.

I am convinced they really could nuke whoever they wanted and they would be praised as heroes.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's still weird that they focused on flavored juices as hard as they did. The problem chemicals and contaminants as far as I know are also in the base juices, not just flavored ones.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I think it's important to remove problematic chemicals and chemicals that turn into aldehydes with heat.

It's weird that people will talk about chemicals in processed foods etc. but willingly inhale many worse chemicals -- and oils, which are the worst -- directly into one of the most sensitive and difficult places to repair.

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you think that vapor is created? There is an internal heating element that turns the juice into vapor and atomizes it for inhalation.

It is true that heating chemical compounds can transform them into different ones, although the heat generated is lower than a cigarette to the best of my knowledge.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Latching on to it is a good thing, the response from the government was to try and ban it entirely which was a bad thing.

Latching on to it pushes to ensure that contaminants are better avoided.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, so the solution is to ensure ingredient accuracy, purity and quality.

Everyone should be able to agree on that at least, but your presentation could probably use some work. All they said was that their experience vaping was better than when they were smoking.

I'm not sure how that makes him an ass hole.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're downvoted for this, but this is definitely a problem that isn't going away without more critical regulation in ingredients.

"But wait," they tell me, "regulation is bad!"

Yes. But not when it comes to ensuring that everything that goes into your lungs are exactly what is on the package. Even if those ingredients are bad, if nothing else regulations need to ensure that what is on the label is the only thing in the product.

Because when they add more ingredients like the Chinese made vape cartridges, you get popcorn lung.

Vaping can help a lot of people stop smoking, so let's ensure that people get ingredient accuracy.

In other words...Make Vaping Great Again.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't just Catturd who gets to say toldya so.

6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, I suppose you don't have to like the side he chose but it was the politically correct side to take. There is no way directly supporting the Palestinians would go somewhere positive for him, and supporting neither side allows them to more effectively run the propaganda about him that they've been trying to run for years.

Politics is an unfortunate game, but remember that just because he chooses a side doesn't mean you have to choose that side too, or any side at all. We aren't playing politics here.

6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +6 / -0

To be precise, exactly 99 out of 100 cameras work perfectly, but one shut down seconds before he killed himself!

13
Wtf_socialismreally 13 points ago +14 / -1

Trump is smart by choosing a side here. The left is stretching itself thin by trying to reconcile supporting both sides, which leads critical people on both sides to view Kamala less than favorably.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, but they did so by disrupting and harming civilians who had no fight. This is just the status quo, and people are eating it up because of who they SAY it's targeting.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like they don't want Trump to absolutely shatter their narrative that Springfield is standing with their pet eater population.

7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +8 / -1

I don't care about the enemies, I care that there is no reason to trust that only enemies are hit.

Then you have fucking retards justifying the deaths of innocents as collateral damage in war and brushing it off.

Which is the same side of a coin as the leftists who celebrate the death of an innocent hero because they are considering it a war against MAGA.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +5 / -1

There is no actual total war happening.

By definition, total war only happens when all sides are willing to use the most destructive weapons -- nuclear, biological, chemical -- on a grand scale.

And you know what every war has? A civilian populace who necessarily reins in their governments to avoid senseless slaughter, and a care to avoid innocent lives being lost.

There is no justification for innocent collateral that you should ever accept. What if it was you? Your mother? Your child?

It would radicalize you.

This is exactly why Bush and Obama strategies of civilian collateral damage in the Middle East did nothing but radicalize entire generations.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

What I want to know is, "what the fuck was in those vaccines". Did they do this because she initially resisted them, therefore giving them justification (in their eyes) to cause this?

I'm borrowing the tinfoil hat from a friend, but I still think it's a good question to ask.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it was pretty commonly understood last time I looked into it that the most common factors of migraines are stress, dehydration and inconsistent/poor sleep.

That's not to say that the chemical bullshit in food and shit aren't likely culprits too, but considering the stress we're under in perpetuity and how difficult it sometimes feels to drink enough water, it makes sense that migraines are so common. So many factors, as you said. +1 for talking about an app to scan products; that's a neat tool.

14
Wtf_socialismreally 14 points ago +14 / -0

Years from now?

I think they already are. Both of them have enough achievements that they have already created a legacy.

-1
Wtf_socialismreally -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's an awful lot of words that had fuck all to do with what I said.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +5 / -3

How do you prove that only they had possession of them?

Who scrutinizes the actions? Who ensures that the targeted are the ones that are guilty as accused?

There is a requirement of trust there that no one should have at present.

They could just as easily nuke an innocent Trump supporter like this, and say "oh he was a terrorist". You'd eat that up?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›