4
XlDEN 4 points ago +5 / -1

I’m betting they already knew the price they’d have to pay. Illegal border crossers should be shot on sight by border patrol anyway.

-1
XlDEN -1 points ago +1 / -2

You speak of an idealism rooted in reality, except the problems arise when the outcomes are not “equal.” This leads to people looking for nonexistent “reasons” why this is the case. Then they seek out “solutions” to combat their “reasons.” This leads to policies like apportioning grades based on race instead of merit, or making legal theft because arrests are disproportionate.

The trade-off is just too great. A black person can be an asset to society, but black people (in the aggregate) are absolutely destructive to civilization. Everywhere they exist in numbers. The greater the numbers the worse the conditions.

It was God that divided us.

2
XlDEN 2 points ago +3 / -1

The guard should be shooting at illegal border crossers. Put a quick end to that shit.

3
XlDEN 3 points ago +4 / -1

The race problem isn’t about “color.” It’s about inherent behavior patterns that are incompatible on small scales and untenable on larger scales.

6
XlDEN 6 points ago +9 / -3

This newish faith based “everyone is the same” religion will absolutely lead to the destruction of civilization.

2
XlDEN 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will be interesting to see what befalls them.

2
XlDEN 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s a window of exception where it’s allowed in many places. For example, in Iowa the age is 16 normally, but 14 if the partner is under 18.

In D.C. the age is 16, but in this case Matt is saying it never happened anyway.

0
XlDEN 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, you never said “completely.” You said “stopped.” Twice.

2
XlDEN 2 points ago +4 / -2

He never set goalposts. Dave just interprets information as it happens... or doesn’t. He can only play with the cards that are dealt. He’s not the dealer.

0
XlDEN 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never said it wasn’t hurting them. I simply countered your assertion that global trade and human trafficking “stopped.” That was an absurd thing to say and I simply called you on that point.

2
XlDEN 2 points ago +3 / -1

“dated”

1
XlDEN 1 point ago +2 / -1

It was only a mud, but it could have been anyone and the nwords wouldn’t care.

0
XlDEN 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’ll say it another way. Buffett is a clown. No one is taking “cues” from him. Period. The problem is Google. Don’t waste your time on garbage designed to keep you occupied from focusing on the real problem. Google. Antitrust.

0
XlDEN 0 points ago +1 / -1

You don’t know anything about Buffett and Lee Enterprises. He does not control them. Period. He assumed debt. That. Is. It. I know you’re trying to save face, but give up. I DO know about this. You do not. Clearly.

However, the situation is much worse than that. The Lee papers have almost no staff left. Some have no editors even. They are staffed by leftists who take their cues from the national feeds.

But NO, Warren Buffett has Nothing to do with Lee operations.

3
XlDEN 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would be done piecemeal that way, not done en masse. But I think they’re really playing a longer game by trying to make it illegal to transfer weapons at all, even inherit them without the government getting involved. Within a few generations every weapon would become illegal.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›