Anytime I see wealthy people make a big pronouncement about leaving nothing to their heirs, it's always a revealing indicator to me that A) their "wealth" was always intangible and paper only and B) it was probably never theirs to gift to begin with.
Evil only lends, it never gifts.
Many of these families end up shocked when estate attorneys sweep through and reveal the departed's true net worth.
It’s still going to his heirs. His children run massive non-profits (to which he consistently donates) and I’m willing to bet money he’s donating his wealth to these charities when he passes. It’s just optics to make all the sheep think he’s a good guy.
Yep. Just one big money laundering scam for the elite. With a little plus of stealing from the little guy who is hoping to put their extra cash back into the world.
Yep, it's the exact same play the Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie generation did. "Give away their money" to causes that conveniently allow them to shape society long after they're dead, but in the shadows. Anyone who doesn't think those families still pull a lot of the strings is kidding themselves.
It's a scam. He donated to Gates Foundation, but he still controls everything as if he owned it.
Complains that taxes are not high enough, but he avoids the taxes himself.
Don't know if it was finally settled or still ongoing, but he has had a multi-year battle with the IRS to avoid paying taxes the IRS says he owes.
He is a charlatan -- someone who pretends to be something he is not.
His schtick is that he is a "value stock investor," buying stocks "cheap" and holding longterm. He might use that as part of his overall strategy, but that is not how he got rich.
His father was a US congressman. When he was 10 years old, his father introduced him to the CEO of Goldman Sachs. Not a typical upbringing.
Once out of college, he set up a hedge fund (back then, called an "investment trust") and his parents and their friends set it up with $100,000 (a lot of money in the 1950's). He got 50% of the profits, even though he didn't put up the money.
He bought a textile company, Berkshire Hathaway, which was failing, and I bet it was due to its massive tax losses, so he could shelter income.
He turned it into an insurance company, because back then, insurance companies could make profits tax-free.
He gets "his people" installed on the board of directors of a company when he buys a signficant portion of that company. That allows him to help direct that company on what to do -- aimed at making the stock price go up.
His wealth was made on (a) leverage and (b) avoiding taxes -- two things he claims nobody should do.
I've heard stories from people who met him, and the word is he is a complete asshole in private.
Plus, he is close with Gates, which makes him even more suspect.
I worked for FOTL Corperate which is a major Berkshire Hathoway company....
I was forced to take repetitive history lessons about WB. They praised him like he was a god. We were "heavily recommended" to donate part of our salary to charities under his foundations such as United Way.
Their energy is super weird.. they take pride in paying third world countries shit to make their tshirts.. They spin in like we saved their lives or something and they should be thankful to even have a job.. I GTFO, QUICKLY.
Its not a cult, its just a place where they force you to spend hours outside of your typical work day to learn more about company history, and participate in activities that benefit the team as a whole. Then we gather around and discuss our great lea.... wait a minute..
Gates made a similar statement about donating or redistributing their wealth after death. Now this makes alot more sense, they're not actually in control of their own capital.
Buffet is absolutely in control, but (legally) it is not HIS capital.
It legally belongs to the trust or foundation, but HE controls the trust or foundation. So, it is no different really than if he owned it, but legally he does not, which creates a beneficial sitiuation for him.
"Own nothing; control everything." -- John D. Rockefeller
He's also an example in the world of finance and economics to ignore what he advises and watch what he DOES. Right now he has a tremendous amount of cash assets on hand, which contradicts his 'financial advice'.... Why? Because he knows economic collapse is around the corner, and his real views on this is to stack as much fiat as possible to weather the hyperinflation storm and still be able to buy junk.
Take note.I don't mean stack fiat, I mean stack a real value asset to get through this. Just decide how large your lifeboat needs to be.
Buffet didn't buy the OWH until 2011 - 30 years plus after the Franklin doings and the court fallout. Editor Harold Anderson, the Baer family, the Kiewit's and others ran that cover-up.
Very true he is no genius, a well connected friend told me they tend to employ a lot of people that do things like hack companies to get insider information along with also the insider information they get by rigging the whole finance game, its not hard to be a "investment genius" if you know ahead of time what is going to be pushed through the courts and what the elites are pushing.
For example with palm oil which is bad for your guts btw, but before they decided to put this in all the food the elites bought up lots of palm oil plantations i think bill gates did this.
Then they profit from forcing the decisions as if you have ever seen that chart which shows all brands are owned by like 6 groups and really its just one group so when the decide to put palm oil in everything its not hard to do.
Straight up I have loaded unloaded and inspected a few hundred thousand containers.gound some junkies,strung out hobos,some mexicans and once sixteen really creepy wierdos.helped save a few dogs and seen more dead shit than I can count and never once did I see or hear anything that made me think theres kids in there.i have picked out the derails and worked ports and same deal.so do I think kids are trafficked in boxes,yes I do because it has happend. But I am very confident it's very rare rather than the preferred method
Buffet is hypocrite. He accumulated wealth by structuring his affairs to minimize taxes. Using creative strategies like wrapping his investments into a tax-exempt insurance fund or funneling money into his 'charitable' trusts then back to his own family.
All that is fine by me, but when he then promotes higher taxes and less loopholes he losses all credibility. He's a cabal puppet mouthpiece.
Remember, he said BTC was "snake oil squared" or something like that. Makes you wonder. Alex Jones says it's a black hat operation, maybe it is, but it can sure make people rich with fiat in the long run. (Now it's in a short term bubble so not a great time to buy for the moment) not financial advice..
And Warren Buffett bought control over all newspapers around Racine, Wisconsin - Paul Ryan’s district straight over from Omaha through Quad Cities to the Chicago and Milwaukee area.
Racine is a major hub for human trafficking. Ask the “sponsors” of the Fight to End Exploitation.
What did Seth Rich know about the Emanuels and Warren Buffett? What is the Committee of 300? What really happened to Johnny Gosch? What happened to the independent newspapers that ran an in-depth story about Johnny Gosch and his mother?
The cast was dominated by Freemasonry, Scientology and Kabbalah. What is the connection between these groups? Who is Jack Parsons? What is the connection between Kabbalah and the Path of Souls which Racine is the gateway to? If you want to explore more clowns, ask what agency heavily recruits from Cornell? Who are the Royal Order of Jesters and Odd Fellows? What role do the Juggalos play?
Why would two main characters be named Red and Fez? What is the Red Fez a symbol for? Why was Ashton Kutcher the original Chrissy Teigen on Twitter, why did he wink at John McCain, how did he scrub the Internet to remove Demi’s involvement in certain “clubs”, and who are Ron Burkle and Guy Oseary? Where is Lenovo based, and how did he get the role on Shark Tank with Mark Cuban?
I don't know the answers to any of that, but I do know this:
John McCain had a "charitable" foundation with over 100 people listed on the board or "working for" the foundation in some way.
Ashton Kutcher was on that list, along with his photo. So, it was definiately him.
The catch is, the foundation's mission was to "prevent human trafficking." Hmm ...
And the foundation's contributors were Saudi Arabia, the Rockefellers, and John McCain's failed presidential campaign (the left over money went to his foundation).
The foundation spent ZERO dollars over a few years that I looked on anything having to do with human trafficking.
Instead, the ONLY expenditure was a single check written, once per year, to Arizona State University to go to the John McCain program at ASU.
The money was used to promote NoName, not anything to do with its supposed mission.
I have never seen a foundation that did absolutely nothing, and yet had over100 people listed as members or "team" etc.
Yes, and he was also chosen at Romney’s running mate. Romney was named after the quarterback of the Racine Legion NFL team (his dad’s cousin). Have you ever heard of the “Second Great Awakening”, Strangite and the Voree plates? Elizabeth Smart was chosen as the spokesperson for Racine’s corrupt “Fight to End Exploitation” program. Look into the “sponsors”.
Paul Ryan is the real secret of the Tarmac meeting. What happened to the pilot? What did he allege before he was killed? Who is Paul’s wife? He didn’t leave public office at the peak of his career as the most powerful man in Congress for a decade to “spend more time with his family” as reported.
Anytime I see wealthy people make a big pronouncement about leaving nothing to their heirs, it's always a revealing indicator to me that A) their "wealth" was always intangible and paper only and B) it was probably never theirs to gift to begin with.
Evil only lends, it never gifts.
Many of these families end up shocked when estate attorneys sweep through and reveal the departed's true net worth.
It’s still going to his heirs. His children run massive non-profits (to which he consistently donates) and I’m willing to bet money he’s donating his wealth to these charities when he passes. It’s just optics to make all the sheep think he’s a good guy.
Yep. Just one big money laundering scam for the elite. With a little plus of stealing from the little guy who is hoping to put their extra cash back into the world.
This is why I say only give to local charities.
Places like the Wounded Warrior Project have sky high administrative costs.
Some of the local ones are very profit for the people running them.
Yep, it's the exact same play the Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie generation did. "Give away their money" to causes that conveniently allow them to shape society long after they're dead, but in the shadows. Anyone who doesn't think those families still pull a lot of the strings is kidding themselves.
It's a scam. He donated to Gates Foundation, but he still controls everything as if he owned it.
Complains that taxes are not high enough, but he avoids the taxes himself.
Don't know if it was finally settled or still ongoing, but he has had a multi-year battle with the IRS to avoid paying taxes the IRS says he owes.
He is a charlatan -- someone who pretends to be something he is not.
His schtick is that he is a "value stock investor," buying stocks "cheap" and holding longterm. He might use that as part of his overall strategy, but that is not how he got rich.
His father was a US congressman. When he was 10 years old, his father introduced him to the CEO of Goldman Sachs. Not a typical upbringing.
Once out of college, he set up a hedge fund (back then, called an "investment trust") and his parents and their friends set it up with $100,000 (a lot of money in the 1950's). He got 50% of the profits, even though he didn't put up the money.
He bought a textile company, Berkshire Hathaway, which was failing, and I bet it was due to its massive tax losses, so he could shelter income.
He turned it into an insurance company, because back then, insurance companies could make profits tax-free.
He gets "his people" installed on the board of directors of a company when he buys a signficant portion of that company. That allows him to help direct that company on what to do -- aimed at making the stock price go up.
His wealth was made on (a) leverage and (b) avoiding taxes -- two things he claims nobody should do.
I've heard stories from people who met him, and the word is he is a complete asshole in private.
Plus, he is close with Gates, which makes him even more suspect.
He's a cabal front. He's probably about as good at trading stocks as Hillary Clinton is at trading livestock futures.
I worked for FOTL Corperate which is a major Berkshire Hathoway company....
I was forced to take repetitive history lessons about WB. They praised him like he was a god. We were "heavily recommended" to donate part of our salary to charities under his foundations such as United Way.
Their energy is super weird.. they take pride in paying third world countries shit to make their tshirts.. They spin in like we saved their lives or something and they should be thankful to even have a job.. I GTFO, QUICKLY.
That sounds like a cult.
Its not a cult, its just a place where they force you to spend hours outside of your typical work day to learn more about company history, and participate in activities that benefit the team as a whole. Then we gather around and discuss our great lea.... wait a minute..
Gates made a similar statement about donating or redistributing their wealth after death. Now this makes alot more sense, they're not actually in control of their own capital.
here's the kicker....they don't actually plan on ever dying.....by hook or by crook, or by evil, they want to live forever....
Close, but not qute.
Buffet is absolutely in control, but (legally) it is not HIS capital.
It legally belongs to the trust or foundation, but HE controls the trust or foundation. So, it is no different really than if he owned it, but legally he does not, which creates a beneficial sitiuation for him.
"Own nothing; control everything." -- John D. Rockefeller
He's also an example in the world of finance and economics to ignore what he advises and watch what he DOES. Right now he has a tremendous amount of cash assets on hand, which contradicts his 'financial advice'.... Why? Because he knows economic collapse is around the corner, and his real views on this is to stack as much fiat as possible to weather the hyperinflation storm and still be able to buy junk.
Take note.I don't mean stack fiat, I mean stack a real value asset to get through this. Just decide how large your lifeboat needs to be.
The names. I always find it particularly interesting as more of the story unfolds. When I see Buffet, I read it as French due to where I live.
Some people here just making up stuff out of thin air then claim it as "obvious facts"
You mean how Buffet's Omaha newspapers destroyed the reputations of child victims?
Buffet didn't buy the OWH until 2011 - 30 years plus after the Franklin doings and the court fallout. Editor Harold Anderson, the Baer family, the Kiewit's and others ran that cover-up.
Very true he is no genius, a well connected friend told me they tend to employ a lot of people that do things like hack companies to get insider information along with also the insider information they get by rigging the whole finance game, its not hard to be a "investment genius" if you know ahead of time what is going to be pushed through the courts and what the elites are pushing. For example with palm oil which is bad for your guts btw, but before they decided to put this in all the food the elites bought up lots of palm oil plantations i think bill gates did this.
Then they profit from forcing the decisions as if you have ever seen that chart which shows all brands are owned by like 6 groups and really its just one group so when the decide to put palm oil in everything its not hard to do.
Straight up I have loaded unloaded and inspected a few hundred thousand containers.gound some junkies,strung out hobos,some mexicans and once sixteen really creepy wierdos.helped save a few dogs and seen more dead shit than I can count and never once did I see or hear anything that made me think theres kids in there.i have picked out the derails and worked ports and same deal.so do I think kids are trafficked in boxes,yes I do because it has happend. But I am very confident it's very rare rather than the preferred method
Too late. If buffet is a human trafficker his estate will Belong tonwr the people.
Buffet is hypocrite. He accumulated wealth by structuring his affairs to minimize taxes. Using creative strategies like wrapping his investments into a tax-exempt insurance fund or funneling money into his 'charitable' trusts then back to his own family.
All that is fine by me, but when he then promotes higher taxes and less loopholes he losses all credibility. He's a cabal puppet mouthpiece.
Just another old scumbag that sucked what he was told for the easy life and a Hell bound eternity.
Remember, he said BTC was "snake oil squared" or something like that. Makes you wonder. Alex Jones says it's a black hat operation, maybe it is, but it can sure make people rich with fiat in the long run. (Now it's in a short term bubble so not a great time to buy for the moment) not financial advice..
His newspapers in Nebraska also maligned and attacked victims of the Franklin Scandal.
https://www.wanttoknow.info/mk/franklin-cover-up.pdf
And Warren Buffett bought control over all newspapers around Racine, Wisconsin - Paul Ryan’s district straight over from Omaha through Quad Cities to the Chicago and Milwaukee area.
Racine is a major hub for human trafficking. Ask the “sponsors” of the Fight to End Exploitation.
What did Seth Rich know about the Emanuels and Warren Buffett? What is the Committee of 300? What really happened to Johnny Gosch? What happened to the independent newspapers that ran an in-depth story about Johnny Gosch and his mother?
poor Johnny Gosch, such a heartbreaking story,
and sad what warren buffet is doing to the midwest.
look at the Iowa indictment map, and you'll see southern Iowa has a lot higher numbers than surrounding states,
and you're right, I80 is a direct route from Omaha to Illinois & SO many semis on that road, wouldn't be hard to hide 'cargo'.
the interstate on the other side of Omaha going west, leads to Lincoln, which is the freemason capital of the state.
obvious what's going on once you look at maps and patterns, and shows how little they care about us finding out.
You are right. They don’t care at all who knows. They are all well protected.
What is the Holy Family Shrine between Omaha and Lincoln, near Ashland?
What is the Shrine Bowl? Why is the head of Shriners International from Racine?
What does the Red Fez represent?
What are ley lines?
great research questions, will keep me busy for awhile;)
and I always thought the shriners were strange and creepy, like clowns but more sinister.
and certainly makes one look at that seventies show in a different way, especially knowing what we know about the cast.
The cast was dominated by Freemasonry, Scientology and Kabbalah. What is the connection between these groups? Who is Jack Parsons? What is the connection between Kabbalah and the Path of Souls which Racine is the gateway to? If you want to explore more clowns, ask what agency heavily recruits from Cornell? Who are the Royal Order of Jesters and Odd Fellows? What role do the Juggalos play?
Why would two main characters be named Red and Fez? What is the Red Fez a symbol for? Why was Ashton Kutcher the original Chrissy Teigen on Twitter, why did he wink at John McCain, how did he scrub the Internet to remove Demi’s involvement in certain “clubs”, and who are Ron Burkle and Guy Oseary? Where is Lenovo based, and how did he get the role on Shark Tank with Mark Cuban?
I don't know the answers to any of that, but I do know this:
John McCain had a "charitable" foundation with over 100 people listed on the board or "working for" the foundation in some way.
Ashton Kutcher was on that list, along with his photo. So, it was definiately him.
The catch is, the foundation's mission was to "prevent human trafficking." Hmm ...
And the foundation's contributors were Saudi Arabia, the Rockefellers, and John McCain's failed presidential campaign (the left over money went to his foundation).
The foundation spent ZERO dollars over a few years that I looked on anything having to do with human trafficking.
Instead, the ONLY expenditure was a single check written, once per year, to Arizona State University to go to the John McCain program at ASU.
The money was used to promote NoName, not anything to do with its supposed mission.
I have never seen a foundation that did absolutely nothing, and yet had over100 people listed as members or "team" etc.
so many connections, but totally makes sense knowing what we know now.
and it gives me a lot to research, thanks! & never heard of path of souls, and Burkle, Oseary, so sure that will an interesting.
& always had a creepy feeling about Demi Moore and TSS cast,
funny how our intuition works that way.
Paul Ryan served Racine? It’s all coming together.
Yes, and he was also chosen at Romney’s running mate. Romney was named after the quarterback of the Racine Legion NFL team (his dad’s cousin). Have you ever heard of the “Second Great Awakening”, Strangite and the Voree plates? Elizabeth Smart was chosen as the spokesperson for Racine’s corrupt “Fight to End Exploitation” program. Look into the “sponsors”.
Paul Ryan is the real secret of the Tarmac meeting. What happened to the pilot? What did he allege before he was killed? Who is Paul’s wife? He didn’t leave public office at the peak of his career as the most powerful man in Congress for a decade to “spend more time with his family” as reported.
Buffett sold his shares of Lee Enterprises (newspapers.)
He still maintains full control. Dig deeper.
No he doesn’t! I know this very well!
Then you are either lying or connected somehow.
Here is the headline from one such article:
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4320910-lee-enterprises-perfect-fit-for-legacy-of-warren-buffett-newspapers
He holds no editorial “control.” He holds debt.
why was he at seth richs bar mtizvah {as speculated by george webb}
That would be weird, for sure.
well there is definitely a photo of them together when seth rich was an early teen
the speculation was whether it was for his bar mitzvah or some other family gathering event
seth rich didnt come from out of a vacuum you realize?
Thanks for this, very informative read.