2
YogiBear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Limited special offer: FREE tickets to Tucker Carlson for UAP members

As a special offer to our valued UAP members, Clive Palmer and the United Australia Party will be sponsoring a limited number of tickets in each venue for the upcoming Australian Freedom Conferences.

If you are interested in attending the event in your nearest city, please complete the application form which you can find by CLICKING HERE.

Please note, you must be a United Australia Party member and your membership must have commenced prior to 13 May 2024.

2
YogiBear 2 points ago +2 / -0

I must have been hiding under a rock to miss this news but got me and my son tickets yesterday. I see the article tries to scare people off with $200 starting ticket prices when the are really $100. Can't wait 🤠

US media titan Tucker Carlson and leading Australian businessman Clive Palmer are joined by American filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza and Queensland GP Dr Melissa McCann for the Australian Freedom Conference.

The event covers a range of topics, including current and future threats to truth, democracies and personal freedoms.

Once the anchor of the highest rating cable news program, Tucker now runs his own successful media channel, the Tucker Carlson Network, where he has interviewed some of the world’s biggest personalities, including Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“Tucker has long advocated that news coverage in the west can be wrongly used as a tool of repression and control,” Clive Palmer said.

“He believes democracy cannot function properly under these controls and the only solution to ending propaganda is fearlessly speaking the truth. I’m delighted Australia has the opportunity to hear from Tucker and our other speakers on this informative national tour.”

1
YogiBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

I listen every morning to see what they are afraid of and how biased ABC Australia is. Look at the balanced opinion here:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/topic/donald-trump

What are they afraid of that causes them not to provide an objective view of Orange Man Bad 😂

Check out the photo of Mary in the original link and the search for an image yourself - same same or different?

NCSWIC

3
YogiBear 3 points ago +3 / -0

US President Joe Biden has rescinded the national emergency order used to fund Donald Trump's border wall.

In a letter to Congress on Thursday, Mr Biden wrote that the order was "unwarranted" and said that no further tax dollars will be spent on the wall.

Mr Trump declared a state of emergency over the southern border in 2019, which allowed him to bypass Congress and use military funds for its construction.

When Mr Trump left office, about $15bn (£11bn) had been spent on the project.

11 FEB 2021 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56031481 (or pick your sauce Romney)

1
YogiBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Telegraph UK said - The international plan for a global minimum tax on multinational firms – under the OECD’s so-called Pillar 2 – is destructive for both the US and the UK. We have been among the most outspoken members of our respective legislatures on this flawed policy, but the OECD and many countries continue to pursue a global minimum tax in an effort to pad their coffers with US and UK tax revenues.

by MAGULQ
2
YogiBear 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the most sincere heartfelt message I've seen in a long while. Gave me goose bumps.

1
YogiBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a great tool to use especially a video with lots of free fall demolitions for comparison.

1
YogiBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

ANAGRAM STOLLEN = TOLLENS

In propositional logic, modus tollens (/ˈmoʊdəs ˈtɒlɛnz/) (MT), also known as modus tollendo tollens (Latin for "method of removing by taking away")[2] and denying the consequent,[3] is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference. Modus tollens is a mixed hypothetical syllogism that takes the form of "If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P." It is an application of the general truth that if a statement is true, then so is its contrapositive. The form shows that inference from P implies Q to the negation of Q implies the negation of P is a valid argument.

TO REITERATE:

If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P.

🧐

1
YogiBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup - you are spot on. Any piece of muck they can rake. Thanks for posting. Sorry I got the wrong end of the stick fren 🙄

4
YogiBear 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's ABC America not Australia but Sky and others have since covered. The original piece has all the red flags we would expect where there is no credible evidence:

Months after leaving the White House, former President Donald Trump ALLEGEDLY discussed POTENTIALLY sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of his Mar-a-Lago Club -- an Australian billionaire who then ALLEGEDLY shared the information with scores of others, including more than a dozen foreign officials, several of his own employees, and a handful of journalists, ACCORDING TO SOURCES FAMILIAR WITH THE MATTER.

The POTENTIAL disclosure was reported to special counsel Jack Smith's team as they investigated Trump's ALLEGED hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the sources told ABC News. The information COULD shed further light on Trump's handling of sensitive government secrets

However =# Special counsel Smith did not include any information about Trump's alleged April 2021 conversation with Pratt in his June indictment against Trump, which charged the former president with 40 counts of unlawful retention of national defense information and obstruction-related offenses.

And Smith would have if the was any credible evidence

3
YogiBear 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excerpt =

With this new information, I now wonder how many of the ‘chosen’ 11,000 were doctors, and if so, why these doctors didn’t raise their voices against the program of coercive inoculation? Had a fraction of them done so, the entire lawlessly intrusive governmental program would have been stopped in its tracks.

I wonder who decided that these 11,000 workers could get off jab-free while my friends and many others suffered the consequences of their conscientious choice? Why were some people deemed ‘essential’ and others not?

Now one can see very clearly and without the shred of a doubt the deeply ingrained hypocrisy of New Zealand’s governing institutions.

And we can see furthermore the sick and depraved immorality that is an integral part of all totalitarian systems, wherein some are ‘chosen’ and some are not.

view more: Next ›