Disinfo? No. I think it was simply a very young, low level aide with a myopic understanding of what was going on. I think he genuinely believes everything he says. I just don't think there is very much value in his perspective of events.
But there is no reason to assume it is intentional disinformation.
Show them some pictures of tortured young children with panda eyes, and then ask them to laugh. I just want to throw up that is in such bad taste. Every single person should print a large picture of that on a poster, and then go protest outside every Papa John's throughout the country.
Just an interview with a very young, low level aide who has a exceedingly myopic view of the issues involved. I'm sure he passionately believes everything he is saying. But I suspect Trump has a much broader perspective.
Why did they get rid of Jackson? Nothing against Kennedy, but removing Jackson from the 20 is a trick of the cabal which needs to be resisted. We don't want their Federal Reserve.
If these are real, I for one will protest and refuse to accept the new $20 notes until Jackson is restored to his rightful place.
I was always taught that it was because it is 6+1. It isn't 7 that is special. It is 6.
Think about math. 6 is the first number that is evenly divisible by 2 different numbers, 2 or 3. The ancients used number systems based on 60, which is 6 x 10, the number of fingers we have. Even today, we still have 60x6 = 360 degrees in a circle. There are 60 minutes in an hour. 60 seconds in a minute. There are 12 months (6x2) in year.
6 is the key. 7 is sacred because it comes after 6 (the smallest, most divisible) and yet is divisible by nothing. Not true for 8, 9 or 10. And if you only have 10 fingers, you might not realize there are numbers beyond 10. That may seem odd today, but thousands of years ago when people were just learning about mathematics and number theory, it makes a lot of sense.
Even in the Bible, 6 is the number that matters. That is the number of work. The 7th day is rest. But to a primitive species, that number 7 must have looked magical.
Think back to your history. Washington chose to cross the Delaware on Christmas. Why did he do this? Now imagine your enemy is the Chinese instead of the British. What is their biggest holiday of the year? When would their defenses be at their weakest? I am not saying anything is definitely going to happen on Feb. 12, but why not consider the larger picture? This is a global cabal. Stop thinking domestically. The stolen US elections are but one facet of the swamp.
Trump chose skilled prosecutors for his attorneys at this impeachment hearing. Not constitutional law experts. Not defense lawyers. Former federal prosecutors. You think that is by accident? I don't think he needs our help defending his actions. I think he has bigger ambitions for this trial.
I am sure there are 80 million people who would testify on his behalf. But the fact they are even proceeding with this sham of an impeachment leads me to believe that all of our rumblings would be whistling into the wind.
Answer: Then don't trust the plan. Plans never survive first contact with the enemy. But you can trust Trump. The guy is a fighter and he never quits. If you think he is just going to abandon everything to the cabal no matter how ugly it gets, you haven't been paying attention.
I am confused how they even get MAC addresses for remote systems. Unless you are using IPv6, the MAC address is stripped off as soon as the packet reaches the first router. The remote MAC address is never transmitted over a router, only the IP address. Which means in order to get a MAC address you would need a sniffer installed on every local network around the planet.
It is possible they find the network and then hack in and install spyware on a computer on that local net that can sniff the address, but I don't believe even the best hackers can do this always and everywhere. This makes me think they may be using something other than a MAC address as a unique identifier for the remote machine. They just format it to look like a MAC address.
The only case I can imagine where you might be able to get a MAC address by monitoring an intermediate network is when you connect via a VPN that simulates a layer 2 network bridge.
So a lot of questions here. I would be interested to know exactly HOW they obtained this data. It would probably answer the question about what this unique identifier actually is. But I assume they will never reveal that to the public.
The military has a shared value system that unites them. The civilian population does not have this. Unfortunately there are millions (and in fact I would say this group makes up well over 50% of the country) who are never going to "wake up" unless they are forced to confront their tightly held preconceptions by seeing undeniable, high profile, political arrests.
So at some point, the "plan" is going to need address this uncomfortable reality. If it doesn't, then the "plan" is fundamentally flawed, created by a military mind that doesn't understand civilians.
Beyond a certain point, it is not about good intentions. It is not even about outcomes. It is about pushing people beyond their comfort zone to instigate change. And most will be more comfortable with simply accepting communism than admitting it was their beliefs and their bad choices that allowed for communism. This is human nature. We tend to double down on bad choices when things don't go our way.
No amount of love is going to break this barrier, except for maybe "tough love".
Intelligence is definitely correlated with the ability to recognize patterns. And as we all know, far from being a conspiracy theory, Q is a movement that promotes seeing the patterns of truth through the noise and obfuscation of the media. Higher intelligence also makes people more naturally curious.
So it makes complete sense that there is a bias towards the more highly educated with Q followers.
What really remains to be seen is how long the intelligent followers at deep state conspiracy promoting sites like Slashdot can maintain their cognitive dissonance and refuse to accept the obvious. Personally, I don't see that happening until some high level, visible arrests are made that force people to acknowledge what they don't want to look at.
It isn't actually inability that makes people turn away from Q, but instead an unwillingness to accept they have been duped. Sadly, humans are far more likely to double down on bad choices than to accept the reality of them.
That must be a seriously tricked out 172!
Assuming the 172-H was modified, a Skyhawk JT-A could push FL200 on a good day.
Maybe it has a fantastic tailwind and an hurricane level updraft? Hope they brought along pressurized oxygen masks.
According to the Bangkok Post about 200 NLD loyalists, mostly students, turned out to protest. The number could grow, but I would guess that outside of the universities most people are simply going to take it in stride. You'll likely find just as many people offering flowers to the soldiers. I really don't think you can compare the response by general citizens in Burma to what would happen in the USA.
I honestly don't believe this is any kind of a trial run. Coups like this are too commonplace in this part of the world. I think it is simply a domestic issue between a corrupt government that rigged an election, a military who didn't appreciate it, and a small group of young activists that are idealists. It's only even getting coverage because of the global spotlight on election fraud due to the theft in the USA.
Wide scale protests don't happen in SE Asia without professional coordination and millions of $$$ in funding to pay the protesters. No cash incentive? Everyone will just shrug and keep going. Let's wait and see if anyone ponies up the cash for a serious protest. Then we might understand if there is more to this coup than meets the eye.
Don't take this to be support of his statement, which has absolutely no basis in fact as far as I can tell. But just to be absolutely clear, he does not say they are sitting in the current congress. These arrests could include retired senators and congressmen. This is one of those frustrating technicalities of language, because it is often permissible to call someone senator even if they are a former senator. It is one of those courtesies extended to elected representatives. It is the same reason why people were wrong to jump on Biden for saying President Trump rather than former President Trump. Either is acceptable, even though the latter is more correct. So it is at least theoretically possible that some retired senators could have been arrested after showing up for the inauguration ceremony, and be lumped in as "senators". Again, all that said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and there is no evidence to support anything he says.
Suspect at least some of them think that now that Biden is in office they are going to be replaced by some liberal, deep state compromised judge that will keep their crimes hidden and their privileges intact. Aren't they going to be disappointed...
Yes. Old news for anyone who has ever studied this.
The Wizard of Oz was originally an allegory meant to expose gold money, the yellow brick road and money of the elite, vs. silver money, the money of the people. It made sense during that time period too, where the government had recently confiscated all gold from the citizens and silver provided a method for breaking their hold on the economy. But that is an anachronism today. The deep state cabal coopted all of it, and turned the argument instead into one of debt based fiat money vs. precious metals in general.
Today, all monetary metals, whether gold or silver, pose a threat to the power and control of the central bank.
"It's the only word like that."
Are you sure?
I agree with you there is no reason to use it, but that is not really what the discussion is about. This particular word is causing issues not because of the nature of what it is, but because of the external nature of those with whom we are fighting. We all know that Q is not a racially motivated group, but yet we are tarnished with that brush daily by the other side. Then, they send shills over here to try and poison the discussions so that they can justify their position. OK. I get it. This is cyber warfare.
But, here is the rub. If we allow them to do this with racism, what else can they use this tactic on? Maybe next they will call us Satan worshipers or baby killers or some equally horrible tag that more properly represents them. Then they send shills over here, and we have to block out another area of thought. And another. And another. And so on.
I am much more concerned about 2 things rather than the actual banning:
Having given into this tactic from the globalists, how do we make sure they don't simply switch to another word? What guarantee do we have from the mods that the bans stop here and go no further?
Why did the mods not discuss this strategy with us as a group before they made a blanket decision as to the best way to counter this threat? It wouldn't have taken much to ask for feedback from the group, and explain their reasoning before pushing through with a dictatorial ban.
We are discussing this because it is a very, very scary tactic the mods have embarked upon, and puts our entire community at risk. In fact, this tactic is so egregious and so opposed to what we represent, that one has to wonder if they aren't doing this on purpose as an experiment to see how we will all react.
I hate the word. I see no value in it. But I will vigorously defend your right to say it, as I expect you to defend my right to call you the disgusting maggot you are if you do. That is our core value here. How can we simply give that up?
How can the mods think that would ever be OK?