I never even said the word "trust".
I essentially said that she does not have enough credibility to change the conversation. That people with far more public credibility have made essentially the same accusations to little effect. She (or anyone wanting to move the needle) needs sauce.
I did make a separate argument that I find it sus some other things she is saying, but that is specific to her and has nothing to do with anyone else.
Here is my problem with this, regardless if she is a shill or a truth speaker... she has no sauce. (what she claims as sauce, is only sauce that she made the accusations not of the accusations themselves)
Why is that important?
Lets take one single accusation she made: Michelle Obama is a man.
90% of the world (normies) does not believe this. If you did a "man on the street" style interview, you would find very few that would answer "is Michelle Obama a man or a woman" with "a man".
This is AFTER someone with far more credibility, Joan Rivers, said it publicly on television and mysteriously "died" shortly afterwards.
So this girl is not going to move the needle even slightly.
Normies are going to have to see a legit dick pic to believe. That's just the cold hard facts.
So in conclusion, this girls admissions, even if true, are of no value to anons.
I actually worry she is a part of a globalist disinformation campaign. Take a single evil truth and tie it to outlandish "conspiracy theories" to discredit the whole. These global underground tunnel systems she speaks of would be the largest human infrastructure project ever constructed by a HUGE factor. The shear amount of labor, displaced earth, equipment, etc could not be hidden from the public eye. May as well blow up the moon with no one noticing.
Sounds like a coordinated op to me.
Be wary. One of the favorite ways these globalist freaks like to protect themselves, is by making themselves look like victims of "conspiracy nuts".
I'm not impressed with the video either.
However, I think you are wrong on this part:
Inter-racial sex intercourse is outside of standard deviation...
Yes. It invokes a feeling of yielding despair, like blue sky breaking through storm clouds. 10/10 - would buy from artist again.
Suddenly this feels much more important:
That substack puts a whole new perspective on "Orange Man Bad".
I'm glad you did too. I love conversations like this.
Yep, that is always true at all levels of access. Think of it more as levels of verified trust, not as blanket access tiers.
I was a contractor of a contractor once, and by the nature of their business I had to get some low level clearance. I never saw anything even remotely secret, as my job had nothing to do with that part of the business. And it was made very clear to me that I was to stay away from that part of it.
Anyway, point being that her explanation of all levels of clearance still being compartmentalized is accurate with my understanding and experience.
He was one of the founders, not a member. Just saying, as it adds more deserved weight to his criticism of the current green peace and the climate agenda.
I’m still digesting this, but I like the path you are on. One thing we all need to keep in mind is, she said “optics”. Not hidden message. Optics refers to the perception of something, that may or may not be true.
Oddly, that very word has come up recently in a delta to GEOTUS’s court date:
EDIT - Thinking in real time….
Optics of GEOTUS saying “we took care of joe biden — he got his shot.”
The literal meaning is, we looked out for pedo-joe and gave him a vaccine.
The optics are GEOTUS is more powerful than pedo-joe and could be viewed as, we put him on the playing field (gave him a shot) and now we’ve effectively removed him (took care of him). Moves and counter moves? A war like posture?
On the last interview I watched (Big MiG Show), she said it “was the lowest level”. So I assume it’s a Public Trust.
Does this remind anyone else of when Hillary would turn into a stiff slab of meat?
Perhaps adrenochrome is not without its side affects. 😉
I normally remove my version when I post a dupe with someone, but in this case I had the full interview.
Sorry about that Purkiss!
Just like he was going to take putin out a month ago?
Sounds like more left wing fan fiction.
I think they average about 2 "Storm of the Century" 's per year.
If you want some surprisingly good and intelligent real time reporting on the storm, that is not WEF/DEI/ESG corporate shill media trying to fear porn climate change 24/7: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Twdn4GowHA
The general assumption is white hats got a hold of this audio and are going to release it. I think it was the cabal in an attempt to replace pedo-joe with someone that requires less cheating to win in 2024.
It also helps them create a narrative that they are "non-partisan" in their lawfare.
So when you ask, who benefits? Its not Trump. He's already winning. Lots of benefits for the cabal though.
I didn't know. Appreciate the link!
Conspiracies.win please.
kek 👈 this one
kek
kek
kek
Very true. There is a ton more concerning information in there. Such as they want to "encourage" employers to provide shuttles for employees.
All movement will be controlled.