It’s stunning for me that no one here points at the below. Are you guys afraid being downvoted? We’re supposed to search for truth. Let me share my thoughts:
She doesn’t have this sad look in the eye as most of the victims do when their lives are affected by the abusers.
In the other video (also sticked) she claimed being abused by both: Obama and Biden. If she added 2 Bushes to her list - no one would believe in a story with 4 presidents. She already claimed half of this list.
Inter-racial sex intercourse is outside of standard deviation so I would also count this as a reason for my own disbelief because we all know that Biden likes to sniff white girls.
Her purple hairs looks woke.
The way she speaks (and please read the whole thing before downvoting) is like if she talked about the most “unbelievable” things portraying it as true. We know that all these things are areal, so I’m not talking about it. The issue is that she presents it like a Red Riding Hood story instead of a true warning about wolves in the forest (especially if they already did some harm to her).
My bet: Her story is fake and staged like J6 to discredit the movement.
This video is not a sale, it's a brave recovering DID system putting together all the personalities and memories after lots of trauma. The ones that front for videos are the brave and upbeat ones, the others are harder to listen to. But she's overall happy that people are listening and waking up.
The standard deviation in statistics means that majority of the people don't enjoy inter-racial sex intercourse.
If some perverts are exceptions - it’s only small %. The article addresses these exceptions. Biden could be one of them too, but from all the videos we’ve seen - he seems to prefer white girls.
Considering that I’m rising multiple red flags here - it’s statistically unlikely to be wrong on all counts.
I think this is a good starting point. There's a few things that stand out to me in the OP clip first of all.
One is an emphasis on being special. "I know things that your average person has no idea about".
Why is this important? Because of what it does and how it does it.
A, it focuses attention on her not on <other>, and B, this specialness is emphasized via knowledge, not via wisdom, or humility. (I know this, and so I'm special).
Two, she backs up this being special by throwing out factoids that anyone spending a few hours in the truth sphere can know about. She says "Why? Why?" but then never answers the question. Instead, she throws out these supposed facts.
"Because Joe Biden as a water island, Jeffrey Epstein had an island, Zuck, facebook owner, he has an island"
So let's look at the facts widely established in the truth sphere. A, Epstein owned an Island, Little St. James. B. Joe Biden's brother (so by extension the Biden crime family) owned a very small plot of land on Water Island, none of which was coastal. He then partitioned it, sold one third of it (reportedly) to some lobbyist for the price he paid for the whole plot in the first place. Etc. (Politico is a corrupt propaganda instrument, but the story checks out from many multiple sources.)
As far as I know, the whole "Biden owned an island" is a disinformation narrative intended to could and confuse the Epstein narrative. Have a look at how the 'fact checkers shoot it down. (https://www.google.com/search?q=water+island+caribbean+joe+biden). It's easy pickings. problem-reaction-solution. Problem - Epstein Island reality Reaction - disinfo narrative Joe biden owns an island too! Solution - Fact Checkers shoot down those crazy conspriacy theorists again!
From what I can see, Zuckerberg owns a large piece of property in Hawaii, and is naturally making problems for the people there in that manner. but the Caribbean?
What's noticeable about Epstein vs these other very dodgy assertions (biden, zuck) is that Epstein's operation was very clearly known, out in the open, for a LONG time. What he was doing there was not known, but the ownership itself was NEVER a "conspiracy theory". It was just plain fact.
Back to the woman:
"right next door to Joe Biden and Jeffrey Epstein. Look it up. Ask me how I know!"
So again, a 'look it up' as if verifying these things proves that she has special knowledge. Obviously, they do not, and are not even factual. BUT very tantilizing and emotionally attractive to those of us who are sick of the sickness of the Elites.
She continues to challenge you, the listener: Look it up!!! To prove that she has special knowledge. Which focuses attention on her. All the examples here are a mix of known information that anyone can find with some effort, and unsubstantialized juicy morsels that seem intended to whet the disbelievers appetite.
She follows off her little tirade with the kicker:
"Every city, they link to the houses they link to the ocean, they link to so much and you won’t believe it but you know what, I’ll say that for you little dummies who feel like you know."
You little dummies?
Belittling the listener is a very passive aggressive method of pushing the idea that I am special and you are not and you had better believe me because x, y and z....
Disclosure: As soon as I saw she was interviewed by Stew Peters, my antenna goes up. My own current view is that it is 80% likely that Stew Peters is a disinfo agent designated to infiltrate the truth sphere, like many others, (e..g Real Raw news, Newspunch, Lin Wood, etc). I'll admit that up front, so that sort of impacts on my initial thoughts re: this woman.
Nonetheless, I find the tirade posted here to be rather transparent in its nature, and bearing many indicators of an ego-driven push for getting attention and exploiting that.
Well, on to the Peters interview, and I'll see how that goes.
Belittling the listener is a very passive aggressive method of pushing the idea that I am special and you are not and you had better believe me because x, y and z....
Not that I am disagreeing with what you posted, but one thing I wanted to point out
A lot of anons or Trump supports belittle leftists for not knowing what we know. When you are never believed by people a person tends to get mad and call names to the sheep. GAW has less of this, but check Patriots.win. Full of people belittling leftists.
Also she gives me some vibes of when Kappy was sharing info. He didn't call names but seemed as excited as her to spread info to the people sending messages.
This is really just my initial impressions, and obviously requires more. She appeared quite different on the Peters interview.
However, full disclosure: I am always very skeptical of potential disinformation agents, whether done for private personal benefit or as part of an anti-truth psyop. When large claims are made, I find that the demeanor and behavior of the claimant are limited in how useful they are, and that more substantive evidence is required than just telling a story that pushes certain buttons but which are very difficult to corroborate.
Some of us are willing to believe in things simply because they appeal to us and give us a sense of surety, rather than because we've applied discretion, discernment and allowed ourselves to be OK with not actually knowing.
To me it seems that HOW we process the information is often more important in a practical sense than whether the information is actually truthful or not.
Your comment straddles the bar between a humorous quip well played and a serious comment with pronounced attitude overtones.
It is opaque. Ambiguous. How do I know? I know. Ask me how I know. (No seriously. Ask me how I know. Knock and the door will be opened. Ask, and you shall receive.)
On a side note, I hear tidbits about this woman having multiple personalities. If this is indeed the case, it could well explain why the personality in the OP clip is like she is. I watched some of her interview with Peters, and found her personality to be markedly different in that.
In any case, the Peters interview is years old, and while it's completely valid not to dismiss any report of this sort of stuff out of hand (we know that it exists), I also think its important to not let one's discernment guard down.
How do I know? I don't. It's an opinion, not a fact!
Nobody here so far appears to know anything about this abuse survivor with multiple personalities and validated stories, so I'll caution your rushing to judgment based on one set of short clips from one of her upbeat outgoing personalities. The older personalities are much more serious but also harder to listen to and don't want to engage in live sessions causing memories of the traumas to come up.
I can't buy that. I have a hard time believing normal survivors who are always sad and can't even gets worse out. It was you life, the only way you knew things to be for years. Children's minds accept the crazy things they are presented with. If the perverts thought you were worth keeping around it's likely because you weren't depressed constantly.
But then again I only speak from personal experience. I've been to lots of survivor meetings and the sad ones are actually rare but more vocal because they say the "right" things.
The fact this is on Stew Peters has my eyebrows raised in a dubious manner. Peters is most likely a voice of disinformation and subterfuge. In my mind its a voice I will note but the information he presents is not to be trusted and therefore filed deep in the future proves past category and never used as a red pill. Information coming from him needs deep vetting and verification from trusted sources before I will relay a word of it to anyone else.
Sticky as this goes with her on Stew Peters. Research it out Anons. Is this legit or horse sh1t? Post down whatcha find please. If she checks out, we must fire all salvos into the inter-webs!
Twattersphere is getting lit up right now with all kinds of Epstein post and other TRUTHS it is crazy AF. I'm trying to find the worth while post as we speak
You know, we haven’t been lied to our whole lives. The truth is quite clear, and these people have even bragged about so much of it. The real problem is people purposely not believing the truth and having to invent the lie. The lie is created by the normies.
People create lies or block the truth from their minds because it is too painful to see especially if they feel helpless (or unable to help).
Have you known about this before? I just found out about these maybe 4 years ago with Adrenochrome and children. I mean, I read children novels and those were fiction.
I’d say there were indications going back to the Franklin cover up in the 80s or the Marc Dutroux serial murders in Belgium which is still linked to the highest politicians in Europe. This stuff was all there when the internet first came online.
And then other examples like the Haiti earthquake and Hillary’s aides stealing children. In high school in the 90s, I had a teacher who raged against abortion and how fetuses were being used in perfumes (not personally sure how true that is,) Even the Syrian civil war was a way to take kids, just as surely the Ukraine war is now. There must be thousands of other examples, clear as day.
every person got his own rythm to exit the matrix...
When I was a kid in 1996, the young Marion Wagon just disappeard the day after my birthday. Her face was on national tv and few days later on milk cartons. (I realized years later that is a little weird this operation to put faces of missing kids on every milk cartons of the country) That was my first wake up call, her face haunted me during a long time cause I keep wondering : WHERE DO THE MISSING CHILDREN GO ?
Don’t say that. Sometimes you can be running on a parallel course but then something happens that draws your attention and makes you suddenly take notice
It was my business partner who woke me up by telling me to look up blood drinking. I thought it was some fringe group doing some Satanic worship. Told me no, go find out. I woke up after that and found out more than I wanted to know especially about all those clinics for youth/beauty in the west coast.
After that, I dug for information everywhere like a dog digging for bones.
This is some of the post. I have not listened to them in their entirety. I played a few to make sure it was her voice. They are at least an hour long and longer. Back when she switched to Telegram these topics were discussed in live chats and people called in to ask questions. She had some trafficked survivor guests also. I remember one lady said her parents had her to sell. She remembered being with her parents and was sold around 5-8 years old. Her story was awful! I don't know her name they used fake names. At first i jumped on these chats and listened for hours until it was just too much.
This is her old YouTube account. I've seen some mention her blue (different colors), her upbeat mood and laughing. I can't find her Instagram account and looks like Telegram account is closed or non existent. In several videos she and her mom talk about the laughter is a coping mechanism. I'm not familiar with her psychology diagnosis but she suffers from multiple issues. Her back story is her parents were in the Black Panthers in LA. Sometime before she was 5/6 she was sold to traffickers. Her stories aren't for the faint of heart! She talks about every aspect of being trafficked. Especially if you don't cooperate they kill you or sell you. She's mentioned going to Playboy Mansion and going through tunnels to Oprah's house. Said Oprah had black parties (I hope that's the term). She says black & foreigner kids of dark skin are more desirable especially because the Adrenochrome is better quality or more potent. As I mentioned in another post on her today I don't know if I believe her or if it's the truth. Either way the things she said were everything I've learned here and a whole lot more.
Backstory of them going on the run. They lived in California (don't remember where). Not in the city but a quiet neighborhood had several acres fenced in with pig, dogs, cats etc. At first one of the dogs was poisoned. Weeks later one was killed and someone went through their house supposedly looking for the evidence she says she has. A neighbor warned them of that. That's when they left everything behind and the remaining pets with friends. I eventually lost track because I couldn't listen to it anymore. It was at the beginning when I learned about trafficking and it was affecting my daily life. Also I had doubts if it was true. I felt bad for having doubts because if someone has survived being in slavery since a kid I can't imagine that horror.
Ally Carter's "bonnet video" is what supposedly broke her out. It shows her cycling between multiple personalities as she claims to have been MK Ultra'd.
I don't have the source she spoke against Stew Peters several months after this interview. I used to follow both her accounts on Instagram and later on Telegram. I stopped following about a year ago. I'm not saying she's lying or it's the truth. I stopped following because it was consuming me and it wasn't healthy for me. She was on the run with her adoptive mother and adoptive grandmother. Most videos were recorded from their van. If she's lying she's studied trafficking and knows a lot. She claims to have evidence held by friends to be released in case of her disappearance. I read several comments on the Twitter post that she's been missing since February.
It’s stunning for me that no one here points at the below. Are you guys afraid being downvoted? We’re supposed to search for truth. Let me share my thoughts:
She doesn’t have this sad look in the eye as most of the victims do when their lives are affected by the abusers.
In the other video (also sticked) she claimed being abused by both: Obama and Biden. If she added 2 Bushes to her list - no one would believe in a story with 4 presidents. She already claimed half of this list.
Inter-racial sex intercourse is outside of standard deviation so I would also count this as a reason for my own disbelief because we all know that Biden likes to sniff white girls.
Her purple hairs looks woke.
The way she speaks (and please read the whole thing before downvoting) is like if she talked about the most “unbelievable” things portraying it as true. We know that all these things are areal, so I’m not talking about it. The issue is that she presents it like a Red Riding Hood story instead of a true warning about wolves in the forest (especially if they already did some harm to her).
My bet: Her story is fake and staged like J6 to discredit the movement.
I'm not impressed with the video either.
However, I think you are wrong on this part:
Remember Haiti.
And hunter and malia kek
This video is not a sale, it's a brave recovering DID system putting together all the personalities and memories after lots of trauma. The ones that front for videos are the brave and upbeat ones, the others are harder to listen to. But she's overall happy that people are listening and waking up.
Yes!!!
The standard deviation in statistics means that majority of the people don't enjoy inter-racial sex intercourse.
If some perverts are exceptions - it’s only small %. The article addresses these exceptions. Biden could be one of them too, but from all the videos we’ve seen - he seems to prefer white girls.
Considering that I’m rising multiple red flags here - it’s statistically unlikely to be wrong on all counts.
I think this is a good starting point. There's a few things that stand out to me in the OP clip first of all. One is an emphasis on being special. "I know things that your average person has no idea about". Why is this important? Because of what it does and how it does it. A, it focuses attention on her not on <other>, and B, this specialness is emphasized via knowledge, not via wisdom, or humility. (I know this, and so I'm special).
Two, she backs up this being special by throwing out factoids that anyone spending a few hours in the truth sphere can know about. She says "Why? Why?" but then never answers the question. Instead, she throws out these supposed facts.
"Because Joe Biden as a water island, Jeffrey Epstein had an island, Zuck, facebook owner, he has an island"
So let's look at the facts widely established in the truth sphere. A, Epstein owned an Island, Little St. James. B. Joe Biden's brother (so by extension the Biden crime family) owned a very small plot of land on Water Island, none of which was coastal. He then partitioned it, sold one third of it (reportedly) to some lobbyist for the price he paid for the whole plot in the first place. Etc. (Politico is a corrupt propaganda instrument, but the story checks out from many multiple sources.)
As far as I know, the whole "Biden owned an island" is a disinformation narrative intended to could and confuse the Epstein narrative. Have a look at how the 'fact checkers shoot it down. (https://www.google.com/search?q=water+island+caribbean+joe+biden). It's easy pickings. problem-reaction-solution. Problem - Epstein Island reality Reaction - disinfo narrative Joe biden owns an island too! Solution - Fact Checkers shoot down those crazy conspriacy theorists again!
From what I can see, Zuckerberg owns a large piece of property in Hawaii, and is naturally making problems for the people there in that manner. but the Caribbean?
What's noticeable about Epstein vs these other very dodgy assertions (biden, zuck) is that Epstein's operation was very clearly known, out in the open, for a LONG time. What he was doing there was not known, but the ownership itself was NEVER a "conspiracy theory". It was just plain fact.
Back to the woman:
"right next door to Joe Biden and Jeffrey Epstein. Look it up. Ask me how I know!"
So again, a 'look it up' as if verifying these things proves that she has special knowledge. Obviously, they do not, and are not even factual. BUT very tantilizing and emotionally attractive to those of us who are sick of the sickness of the Elites.
She continues to challenge you, the listener: Look it up!!! To prove that she has special knowledge. Which focuses attention on her. All the examples here are a mix of known information that anyone can find with some effort, and unsubstantialized juicy morsels that seem intended to whet the disbelievers appetite.
She follows off her little tirade with the kicker:
"Every city, they link to the houses they link to the ocean, they link to so much and you won’t believe it but you know what, I’ll say that for you little dummies who feel like you know."
You little dummies?
Belittling the listener is a very passive aggressive method of pushing the idea that I am special and you are not and you had better believe me because x, y and z....
Disclosure: As soon as I saw she was interviewed by Stew Peters, my antenna goes up. My own current view is that it is 80% likely that Stew Peters is a disinfo agent designated to infiltrate the truth sphere, like many others, (e..g Real Raw news, Newspunch, Lin Wood, etc). I'll admit that up front, so that sort of impacts on my initial thoughts re: this woman.
Nonetheless, I find the tirade posted here to be rather transparent in its nature, and bearing many indicators of an ego-driven push for getting attention and exploiting that.
Well, on to the Peters interview, and I'll see how that goes.
wwg1wga
Not that I am disagreeing with what you posted, but one thing I wanted to point out
A lot of anons or Trump supports belittle leftists for not knowing what we know. When you are never believed by people a person tends to get mad and call names to the sheep. GAW has less of this, but check Patriots.win. Full of people belittling leftists.
Also she gives me some vibes of when Kappy was sharing info. He didn't call names but seemed as excited as her to spread info to the people sending messages.
Thanks for the input. Valid points.
This is really just my initial impressions, and obviously requires more. She appeared quite different on the Peters interview.
However, full disclosure: I am always very skeptical of potential disinformation agents, whether done for private personal benefit or as part of an anti-truth psyop. When large claims are made, I find that the demeanor and behavior of the claimant are limited in how useful they are, and that more substantive evidence is required than just telling a story that pushes certain buttons but which are very difficult to corroborate.
Some of us are willing to believe in things simply because they appeal to us and give us a sense of surety, rather than because we've applied discretion, discernment and allowed ourselves to be OK with not actually knowing.
To me it seems that HOW we process the information is often more important in a practical sense than whether the information is actually truthful or not.
Pardon me but your assessment is wrong. How do I know? Because I know. Ask me how I know.
Your comment straddles the bar between a humorous quip well played and a serious comment with pronounced attitude overtones.
It is opaque. Ambiguous. How do I know? I know. Ask me how I know. (No seriously. Ask me how I know. Knock and the door will be opened. Ask, and you shall receive.)
On a side note, I hear tidbits about this woman having multiple personalities. If this is indeed the case, it could well explain why the personality in the OP clip is like she is. I watched some of her interview with Peters, and found her personality to be markedly different in that.
In any case, the Peters interview is years old, and while it's completely valid not to dismiss any report of this sort of stuff out of hand (we know that it exists), I also think its important to not let one's discernment guard down.
How do I know? I don't. It's an opinion, not a fact!
Nobody here so far appears to know anything about this abuse survivor with multiple personalities and validated stories, so I'll caution your rushing to judgment based on one set of short clips from one of her upbeat outgoing personalities. The older personalities are much more serious but also harder to listen to and don't want to engage in live sessions causing memories of the traumas to come up.
I can't buy that. I have a hard time believing normal survivors who are always sad and can't even gets worse out. It was you life, the only way you knew things to be for years. Children's minds accept the crazy things they are presented with. If the perverts thought you were worth keeping around it's likely because you weren't depressed constantly.
But then again I only speak from personal experience. I've been to lots of survivor meetings and the sad ones are actually rare but more vocal because they say the "right" things.
The fact this is on Stew Peters has my eyebrows raised in a dubious manner. Peters is most likely a voice of disinformation and subterfuge. In my mind its a voice I will note but the information he presents is not to be trusted and therefore filed deep in the future proves past category and never used as a red pill. Information coming from him needs deep vetting and verification from trusted sources before I will relay a word of it to anyone else.
Totally agree looks like a setup to attack us again.
Sticky as this goes with her on Stew Peters. Research it out Anons. Is this legit or horse sh1t? Post down whatcha find please. If she checks out, we must fire all salvos into the inter-webs!
More: background on the woman in the video https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1699235701026386096?t=3j8JaLXNAC_ci3u7Mph1Gg&s=19
More: https://twitter.com/TheThe1776/status/1699279628345704811?t=LA_kkuK8tpbeC8tDb41piA&s=19
So all these nightmare conspiracies are true? Can you just see this now?
Twattersphere is getting lit up right now with all kinds of Epstein post and other TRUTHS it is crazy AF. I'm trying to find the worth while post as we speak
Thanks. Info so dark are just POURING out like a dam break.
Ain't gonna lie I'm a little excited so I got to watch what I post. I'm just glad to see it getting the attention it deserves.
Amen. I am glad more info are slowly dripping out.
Sounds like a coordinated op to me.
Be wary. One of the favorite ways these globalist freaks like to protect themselves, is by making themselves look like victims of "conspiracy nuts".
You know, we haven’t been lied to our whole lives. The truth is quite clear, and these people have even bragged about so much of it. The real problem is people purposely not believing the truth and having to invent the lie. The lie is created by the normies.
People create lies or block the truth from their minds because it is too painful to see especially if they feel helpless (or unable to help).
Have you known about this before? I just found out about these maybe 4 years ago with Adrenochrome and children. I mean, I read children novels and those were fiction.
I’d say there were indications going back to the Franklin cover up in the 80s or the Marc Dutroux serial murders in Belgium which is still linked to the highest politicians in Europe. This stuff was all there when the internet first came online.
And then other examples like the Haiti earthquake and Hillary’s aides stealing children. In high school in the 90s, I had a teacher who raged against abortion and how fetuses were being used in perfumes (not personally sure how true that is,) Even the Syrian civil war was a way to take kids, just as surely the Ukraine war is now. There must be thousands of other examples, clear as day.
I must have been very blind.
every person got his own rythm to exit the matrix...
When I was a kid in 1996, the young Marion Wagon just disappeard the day after my birthday. Her face was on national tv and few days later on milk cartons. (I realized years later that is a little weird this operation to put faces of missing kids on every milk cartons of the country) That was my first wake up call, her face haunted me during a long time cause I keep wondering : WHERE DO THE MISSING CHILDREN GO ?
26 years later, she's still missing.
Bless you for waking up so early. I woke up about pharma really early but things like this, really late.
Don’t say that. Sometimes you can be running on a parallel course but then something happens that draws your attention and makes you suddenly take notice
It was my business partner who woke me up by telling me to look up blood drinking. I thought it was some fringe group doing some Satanic worship. Told me no, go find out. I woke up after that and found out more than I wanted to know especially about all those clinics for youth/beauty in the west coast.
After that, I dug for information everywhere like a dog digging for bones.
Thanks.
More: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12453903/Vivek-Ramaswamy-Dubin-Epstein-campaign-donation.html
Steer clear of this charlatan
Yes!
This is some of the post. I have not listened to them in their entirety. I played a few to make sure it was her voice. They are at least an hour long and longer. Back when she switched to Telegram these topics were discussed in live chats and people called in to ask questions. She had some trafficked survivor guests also. I remember one lady said her parents had her to sell. She remembered being with her parents and was sold around 5-8 years old. Her story was awful! I don't know her name they used fake names. At first i jumped on these chats and listened for hours until it was just too much.
Scroll down past the purple font.
https://www.allysarmy.com/new-page-1
Is that......
that guy?!
This is her old YouTube account. I've seen some mention her blue (different colors), her upbeat mood and laughing. I can't find her Instagram account and looks like Telegram account is closed or non existent. In several videos she and her mom talk about the laughter is a coping mechanism. I'm not familiar with her psychology diagnosis but she suffers from multiple issues. Her back story is her parents were in the Black Panthers in LA. Sometime before she was 5/6 she was sold to traffickers. Her stories aren't for the faint of heart! She talks about every aspect of being trafficked. Especially if you don't cooperate they kill you or sell you. She's mentioned going to Playboy Mansion and going through tunnels to Oprah's house. Said Oprah had black parties (I hope that's the term). She says black & foreigner kids of dark skin are more desirable especially because the Adrenochrome is better quality or more potent. As I mentioned in another post on her today I don't know if I believe her or if it's the truth. Either way the things she said were everything I've learned here and a whole lot more.
Backstory of them going on the run. They lived in California (don't remember where). Not in the city but a quiet neighborhood had several acres fenced in with pig, dogs, cats etc. At first one of the dogs was poisoned. Weeks later one was killed and someone went through their house supposedly looking for the evidence she says she has. A neighbor warned them of that. That's when they left everything behind and the remaining pets with friends. I eventually lost track because I couldn't listen to it anymore. It was at the beginning when I learned about trafficking and it was affecting my daily life. Also I had doubts if it was true. I felt bad for having doubts because if someone has survived being in slavery since a kid I can't imagine that horror.
https://youtube.com/@LynzeSouthern
Ally Carter's "bonnet video" is what supposedly broke her out. It shows her cycling between multiple personalities as she claims to have been MK Ultra'd.
All this is at her website https://www.allysarmy.com/ally-and-shelly
I'm inclined to believe her.
Does stew peters have any credibility?
I don't have the source she spoke against Stew Peters several months after this interview. I used to follow both her accounts on Instagram and later on Telegram. I stopped following about a year ago. I'm not saying she's lying or it's the truth. I stopped following because it was consuming me and it wasn't healthy for me. She was on the run with her adoptive mother and adoptive grandmother. Most videos were recorded from their van. If she's lying she's studied trafficking and knows a lot. She claims to have evidence held by friends to be released in case of her disappearance. I read several comments on the Twitter post that she's been missing since February.