4
beefsteak 4 points ago +5 / -1

They just blocked people from buying stocks that the elite want to short. Allowing them only to sell, playing into the status quo manipulation. Its a Boston tea party situation and they just Boston Massacre'd right back.

8
beefsteak 8 points ago +8 / -0

Crying shill when something doesn't resonate with the echo chamber is not going to promote any sort of healthy discussion or further any discoveries.

Turning this forum into a circle jerk of repasted poorly modified infographics from facebook is only going to diminish the quality of people staying in it.

I 100% support calling out obvious distractions. If you are looking to just blindly spread whatever matches your desired narrative without any actual critical thought perhaps patriots.win is the place for you.

OP has presented a relatively convincing argument (images) that have been shown before, covering your ears and screaming instead of offering a rebuttal just makes you a useful idiot, you just happen to be a useful idiot on this side of the fence.

4
beefsteak 4 points ago +4 / -0

2mins into the video he starts shitting on Q.

7
beefsteak 7 points ago +7 / -0

its missing the lead in

"the alternative vision"

I don't like him either, but i dont want this to be a chain letter forwarding factory of fake trash, it discredits everything.

6
beefsteak 6 points ago +6 / -0

Out of context.

4
beefsteak 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cloudflare uses a wide cast distribution of assets to mitigate DDoS efficacy. They arent a single (or just a few) datacenters like their clients would likely be.

Think of the internet as a 'web' of interconnected nodes, and their servers are spread all over that web and act as a mask for protected hosts.

In a nutshell, if someone had a botnet powerful enough to take down cloudflare, they'd have to take down every major router all over the place along the way.

1
beefsteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or a honeypot harvesting IPs

4
beefsteak 4 points ago +4 / -0

Something about this post feels dubious.

1
beefsteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

same, is this intentional?

1
beefsteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the permissiveness of 'cancel culture' and obvious infiltration of the media and big-tech allow the left to be dramatically amplified. They have most, even a lot of us, believing they are the super majority, when in reality most people seem to be significantly moderate.

Without a corrupt media to think for them, the outrage will moderate itself. If this whole scenario is to be believed, then this isn't just a fight for a single presidency, this is a fight to undue years of sabotage.

1
beefsteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

SLA not PLA, excuse me.

1
beefsteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

During the 70s they wore the shield style badge. Its referred to as a "Patty Hearst" badge because people associated it with the USMS during the PLA ordeal.

The current authorized issue USMS badge is a round cut with a large star.

2
beefsteak 2 points ago +2 / -0

The reference badge is a 'Patty Hearst Badge' and are not current issue for the USMS.

5
beefsteak 5 points ago +5 / -0

is it routine for them to have slung rifles like that inconus?