5
blahblah-ologist 5 points ago +7 / -2

Obviously you missed the point.

He never said Babe Ruth was an alien. But it's cool.

In regards to Chernobyl, nuclear weapons =/= nuclear power. The idea he is putting forth is not that nuclear power doesn't exist, but that the idea that you could weaponize the process that occurs in massive nuclear power plants into transportable devices is far less certain.

The "nuclear" weapons is coded speak for blackmail information regarding people in power in sexual relations with children. So when "nuclear" threats are made, it is governments that all have "mutual assured destructive" evidence of these indiscretions threatening to release the information. It is how they tell each other they want to come to the table to talk about something they want.

The "people of Japan wouldn't surrender" argument has always been stupid, because the people of Japan at the time did not live under a democratic government. They were an empire. They wouldn't give up because their emperor didn't TELL them to give up.

Asians have always been culturally far more collectivist and subservient by nature, as it is deeply ingrained in their culture to listen to centralized authority figures. Great for discipline, bad for innovation. Just look at Asian-American vaccine rates for the Covid jab vs. the rest of our country.

Point being, when Japan surrendered, it wasn't because "the people" were so scared of the atomic bombs we dropped. It was because THE EMPEROR called it quits. The assertion is that the Emperor was told through the naming of the publicized bombs (Fat Man and Little Boy) what was going to come out if he didn't surrender. I don't know if you know this, but Emperors don't generally give a shit about the peons. The story that the Emperor was concerned about the loss of life from such devastating weaponry and so he wanted to "save his people" is at least as silly as the idea that "mutually assured destruction" is just a clever fiction concocted by the powers that be in the world calling the blackmail evidence they all hold on each other "nuclear weapons" as they know that if word gets out, the people will rise up and depose ALL OF THEM.

It also explains why there is this rapid movement to normalize pedophilia, so they can escape the trap they've all created for themselves. But that's a line of thought for another day...

3
blahblah-ologist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh I know. This is just too damn perfect not to be part of the awakening.

5
blahblah-ologist 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, they're not real open to "bootstrapping" rhetoric, either, and him blaming the Afghan people did NOT go over well.

2
blahblah-ologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with you on your intuition that there is more going on here than meets the eye.

However.

Trump himself has made multiple statements about it. If this was a DS distraction move to empower themselves, he would not be playing into it.

I think there is merit to the idea about flips (as per SymbolsAnon's wonderful decodes), but at some point that means the MSM also needs to flip. Maybe this is that moment, when they can finally turn their backs on the DS and toward truth.

I think we may finally be watching the beginning of the events which will start the mass redpilling of normies. The galvanizing incidents hitting one after another. Kabul>Audits>Durham>Maxwell/Spears>Covid

1
blahblah-ologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the hell does abortion have to do with my point? I am anti-abortion.

I just find it funny that you are running up and down other threads calling people Satanists and controlled opposition all while you're Stan-ing for Catholicism.

Common trend with you. Concern troll extraordinaire.

2
blahblah-ologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

You called claims that I didn't make "false". That is calling me a liar, based on a straw man.

I never said that mRNA vaccines had only been available for half a year. I said that the Covid vaccines have only been available for half a year, because that's how long they have been available.

I also never said the vaccines had not been tested. I said there had been no long-term trials, because once again, Covid first came into our lives in October of 2019. Meaning, that it is literally impossible for us to have any long-term trials for vaccines designed to combat that particular virus.

You can make all your myopic, semantical arguments to someone who gives a shit. "Oh well the vaccines aren't that different, they're the same at base, just tailored to different viruses hyuck hyuck", while I sit here seeing you for what you are, a handshake shill using canned responses to shadowbox against straw men.

I'm not upset, I just see you for who you are, and you don't like it.

3
blahblah-ologist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Knowledge. Just learn, pay attention, and be aware of what is happening. As things get crazier and crazier, more and more people's eyes will be ready to "see".

It isn't for us to proselytize this like a religion. We don't need to go door to door like Jehovah's Witnesses. The Biden regime is providing the chaos and the fear with their ineptitude. As chaos encroaches, people go looking for answers, and our job is to be there to provide them with guidance. When your friends begin asking questions, you just lead them to true information, and ease their fears.

I thought long and hard about why it was necessary for Q to put out this information to the public ahead of time, potentially endangering OPSEC. Wouldn't it have been easier to beat the cabal if they had been left completely in the dark about the danger? And there is only one reason I could come up with. We are Normandy. In all previous iterations of military seizing power from a "duly elected" regime, there has been violent upheaval and the need for post hoc re-education or "cultural revolution". When a society is unmoored from it's grounding, when they are told to believe in a new reality, they reject it at first. It is a normal psychological response, and that rejection often manifests violently.

Think of how you likely felt the first time you began questioning the overarching narrative. Think of the weight of realizing just how much of what we have been told is false. Did you suffer stress and anxiety as you reconciled the cognitive dissonance? Did you seek out narratives trying to undermine the new and painful ones you were coming to believe, trying to take the blue pill and go back into the matrix?

I know I did. Until I came to realize that what at first seemed like the fever dreams of a madman made more logical sense than the reality I was holding on to. The more context I added, the more undeniable it came to be.

Anyway, I think Q understood through study of history that they would need a sizeable portion of the populace to have already gone through this psychological turmoil and to have emerged out the other side to alleviate the post-transition violence. We took the beachhead so they could land more troops safely. We are the calm in the eye of the storm. We attest to the movement's credibility. We are the transition team.

Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better. Just stay grounded, and be ready to help people as they seek out stability.

2
blahblah-ologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I agree in principle, I would caution not to fall prey to cynicism. Not everyone who is a "degenerate" wants to be so. Many are the victims of loss of hope, riders in the front seat of a world gone mad, and hope can be restored if done properly. Hell, just look at Mike Lindell, for instance.

I know many people who were substance abusers, addicted to porn, promiscuous and overall "degenerate", who have turned toward the MAGA movement and found God as a result of seeing the truth laid bare before them. The option of a way off this hellish rollercoaster.

I myself am one of them.

1
blahblah-ologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't he know that "folks" is considered "white supremacist rhetoric"?

6
blahblah-ologist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh, the old tried and true "seatbelt" argument. False equivalence for obvious reasons. The seatbelt only ever kicks into use if I get into an accident. There is no risk to me for using it, at all. It isn't just going to up and decide to strangle me to death for wearing it, whereas these vaccines are chemicals being injected into your body where they very well may do nothing to harm you, but they are in you; part of you in perpetuity, whether you ever would have gotten sick or not (especially the mRNA vaccines).

I am a veteran. I have taken more vaccines than I care to remember. And I suffer from auto-immune disorders that are apparently genetic, which onset after my military service, but that which no one else in my family suffers from. I just lost a grandfather two years ago that suffered multiple awful health consequences directly attributable to his exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam. I have an uncle that developed asthma only AFTER joining the Navy in the 1980's. I have a grandmother suffering from Alzheimer's, which neither of her parents ever had, but which every single one of her 13 brothers and sisters died from. The rest of our family are about as healthy as any you've ever met. Just so happens the only veterans in the group (and the weird issue with my grandmother and her siblings) are the only ones who have all these strange health outcomes. Maybe that means these things were environmentally derived health outcomes. We'll likely never know.

Ever heard of Gulf War Syndrome? The Tuskegee Airmen? Lead paint and gas? Flint, Michigan? These are only a few of such issues which came to light, and how many never do come to light?

Roll your dice all you want, I won't begrudge you that choice. But don't act like you know jack shit about the efficacy and safety of these vaccines, when we literally CAN'T know anything about long-term health outcomes, because they've only been available for half a year, were developed in less than a year, and were issued under emergency use authorization without any long-term trials possible.

This entire board exists as a result of the unbelievability of popular narratives, and yet here you are regurgitating them, knowing full well that your immediate health outcomes mean nothing until you've had that vaccine running through your blood for an extensive period of time, until people who've been vaccinated begin having children and those children's health can be monitored and studied, etc.

You roll your dice; I'll roll mine.

5
blahblah-ologist 5 points ago +5 / -0

The number of people who die of Covid is also statistically insignificant, by that measure.

I know thousands of people, and not one has died of Covid. I have some online friends who claim to have relatives who have died, but I have never personally met a single person who has died of Covid. My own great grandmother, in a nursing home with late stage Alzheimer's got the virus and recovered with no long term adverse affects, and no one in her home died during the outbreak at the home.

If I knew even a single person that had been seriously adversely affected by the virus, I might be willing to take the vaccine. As it stands? After 18 months of living my life as normally as possible, living in a suburb of a major American city, working, going shopping, going out to eat, taking vacations, visiting the VA hospital for routine appointments, going to the dentist, spending time with family and friends, etc., I have not yet come into direct contact with anyone who has been ill from the virus.

That isn't to say I don't believe it exists; just to say that I think if it was gonna "get me", it's had plenty of opportunity already.

7
blahblah-ologist 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think you may have happened across the wrong page...

15
blahblah-ologist 15 points ago +16 / -1

Wrong. If the people do not accept "justice" as being "justice", then we'll be embroiled in a civil war immediately.

As painful as it is to endure, we HAVE to go through the devolution process in order for normies to wake up. If they don't want the "justice" outcome we want, then the cycle will just repeat ad nauseam.

If the military steps in, and the average US citizen still believes the narrative which has been weaved for generations by the cabal, then they will see it as an unjust "coup", effectuated by a tyrannical madman. No amount of evidence presented AFTER the fact will sway them away from that belief.

The only way for this to succeed is for the vast majority of Americans to WANT the coup before it happens. Otherwise there will be a strong resistance force, which will draw the support of all of our foreign enemies in attempts to overturn the new regime. And unfortunately, it is impossible to know just how many people want it in real time, because we can't know how many people have actually "awakened". Therefore, the only way to be sure, is to allow the madness to progress on such a pace as to make it plain as day that we've been infiltrated and subverted before tripping the switch, to reach the "precipice".

This is what is meant by the Q claim "4-6% lost forever". That is an assumption that the propagandistic narrative control has been so successful as to turn 1 out of 20 Americans so strongly against their own country that they will NEVER be able to accept the truth. They will likely forever believe that their country was seized by tyrants and they had to live under despotic totalitarianism for the remainder of their lives. These are the kind of people who already believe the modern US is "worse" than it was prior to the ending of slavery as an institution. Their ability to reason has already been so warped as to not be able to tell up from down, anymore. They believe we are slaves to the capitalist system akin to the Uyghurs in China.

Problem is, 4-6% is already awfully high. If that number was 10%, 20%? Just imagine what it would be like to live in the post-Xiden regime if even 1 out of 10 Americans were revolutionary dissidents, prone to the belief that they were resisting an illegitimate dictatorship. We would live under the constant threat of terrorism, secession, revolution...

I personally worry that even 4-6% is too high. That is 10-15 million people who will not accept what is coming...

No, as painful as it is, this is necessary. We have to walk right up to the edge of the cliff before most will see it for what it is...

12
blahblah-ologist 12 points ago +12 / -0

Was just about to post this.

THIS is the major takeaway from this post, IMO. With all the Dem "Code Red" comms, the obvious threat of the symposium to the DS, the fact that Friday is Friday the 13th, etc., everyone should be aware of the danger of FFs this week already.

But just in case there are people out there thinking "white hats are in control" and that means there is no longer any danger, this is a direct message from someone in Trump's inner circle and a direct communicator to the Q comms aware people that there is imminent risk this week.

And since it says "US risk", I am not thinking this would be a localized or small scale threat. This is a warning of a massive potential operation, a la 9/11 or Pearl Harbor.

Keep your heads on a swivel. Be aware of your surroundings. See anything that looks out of sort, report it. Better to have this thwarted than to see it succeed. Make them spend their ammunition on a failed operation. Save lives.

1
blahblah-ologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess I ran a little fast and loose with the part about them "telling" Trump this, but he says he made the decision because Mattis and Obama didn't like Milley.

3
blahblah-ologist 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://thedeskofdonaldtrump.com/category/statements/page/2/

In any event, I lost respect for Milley when we walked together to St. John’s Church July 15, 2021 / Statements by Donald J. Trump “Despite massive Voter Fraud and Irregularities during the 2020 Presidential Election Scam, that we are now seeing play out in very big and important States, I never threatened, or spoke about, to anyone, a coup of our Government. So ridiculous! Sorry to inform you, but an Election is my form of “coup,” and if I was going to do a coup, one of the last people I would want to do it with is General Mark Milley. He got his job only because the world’s most overrated general, James Mattis, could not stand him, had no respect for him, and would not recommend him. To me the fact that Mattis didn’t like him, just like Obama didn’t like him and actually fired Milley, was a good thing, not a bad thing. I often act counter to people’s advice who I don’t respect.

In any event, I lost respect for Milley when we walked together to St. John’s Church (which was still smoldering from a Radical Left fire set the day before), side by side, a walk that has now been proven to be totally appropriate—and the following day Milley choked like a dog in front of the Fake News when they told him they thought he should not have been walking with the President, which turned out to be incorrect. He apologized profusely, making it a big story, instead of saying I am proud to walk with and protect the President of the United States. Had he said that, it would have all been over, no big deal, but I saw at that moment he had no courage or skill, certainly not the type of person I would be talking “coup” with. I’m not into coups!

In fact, around the same time Milley, in a conversation, was an advocate of changing all of the names of our Military Forts and Bases. I realized then, also, he was a much different person than I had hoped. I said to him, “spend more time thinking about China and Russia, and less time on being politically correct.”

But never during my Administration did Milley display what he is showing now. He was not “woke.” Actually, I don’t believe he ever was, but the way I look at Milley, he’s just a better politician than a general, trying to curry favor with the Radical Left and the absolute crazy people espousing a philosophy which will destroy our Country!”

By Donald J. Trump

23
blahblah-ologist 23 points ago +23 / -0

One of the reasons why I have not yet jumped on the Milley hate train, is because his heel turn was so abrupt and over-the-top, that I wonder if he might be another stealth bomber.

Trump said in his statement the other day that Mattis and Obama told him not to trust Milley, which is exactly why he chose to trust him.

Mattis and Obama didn't trust Milley. Reconcile.

1
blahblah-ologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for having a reasonable and open conversation about it.

I will say this: I will openly state that I "believe" in Q, meaning that I believe that it is someone with high level access and top secret clearance. I also "believe" that it is working for the good of the people.

HOWEVER, I trust no one unconditionally. I worry daily about what comes after. If Q turns out to be real; if the military temporarily seizes control in order to sort out the election drama and bring justice to the corrupt, it will be unprecedented in the history of the US. Our very own Nuremburg style tribunals? It's a scary thought. And I also understand the way mobs work, and worry about the proposition that IF this all plays out the way we've been led to believe, that Trump will essentially have to make the George Washington-esque choice to turn down the crown which will likely be offered to him.

If all he says turns out to be true, there will be a good many people who will be glad to offer him kingship as he will be the only person they feel they can trust to run things. That's a hell of a bounty, and one that most would not turn their backs on. So I am not being uncritical about this. The ONLY thing that daily makes me feel like I am supporting the right side (as of now) is that the people on the opposing side of Trump prove daily with their words and actions that they are bad, bad people.

I do not ascribe to the idea that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", but my enemy (Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer, Swalwell, McConnell, Graham, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) is most definitely my enemy, and Trump has not yet done anything which directly seemed to deem him my enemy. My life and those of all of my loved ones got objectively better under his stewardship and policies until Covid came, and seeing the way the apparatus opposed him at every turn during the pandemic, I can't exactly blame him for the way things have gone since then.

Full disclosure, I didn't vote for Trump in 2016. I thought Q was a LARP the first time I heard of it. I didn't even become a Trump supporter until I began watching the Covid Task Force briefings last year and then comparing them to the way the media covered them and seeing just how badly the media misrepresented what occurred in the briefings. It was then that I began watching Trump rallies, and seeing that what Trump said in his speeches ALSO didn't match with the way the media portrayed them.

Once the scales fell from my eyes regarding the way the media and social media control narratives, I began to re-evaluate everything I used to believe. And I began finding cracks everywhere. Eventually, I found my way to TDW, and then by chance I found my way here on Jan 21st when TDW had been so overrun by shills that I was looking for somewhere that the tone seemed to match the attitude Trump was portraying, which was that of confidence.

That was the first time I came into contact with the actual Q posts, and being a former military cryptolinguist, I was instantly intrigued. I read them all. I reconciled them with events of the time they were written, and I came to believe.

I am not here because of all the adrenochrome and sex cult narratives which have been formulated by Q supporters filling in the gaps in the Q drops. I am here because of the Q drops and their correlation to real world events which have already been confirmed.

Anyway, I know this is a lot to throw at you, but I am just trying to give you a different perspective than that of the caricaturish "Qanon" follower as portrayed by pretty much every media and government source.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›