Japan Ends Mandatory Child 'Vaccines,' Sudden Infant Deaths 'Disappear' - Slay News
A leading American physician has issued an alarming wake-up call to Western nations by warning that Japan's sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) crisis "disappeared" as soon as the government ended the country's mandatory "vaccine" schedule.
It should be law that 'mandatory' and 'vaccine' are NEVER allowed together, under any circumstance.
vaccines are elective, supposedly preventative.
they should never be mandatory
Effective at destroying your life.
I mean, modern ones, yes. I wish we could go back go using a dead virus samples, killed with heat, radiation or ethanol and suspended in saline, like they did when vaccines were first produced.... That's a real vaccine, and I'd be okay with it. But why the fuck do vaccines have mercury in them??! Why formaldehyde??! Why heavy metals like cadmium and lead??! Those are not needed to kill the virus or produce a normal and safe vaccine. Modern vaccines are full of poison. Old vaccines were the shit!
My two cents, I guess
You are correct. The "real" vaccines you refer to were designed for a person's own immune response and not this current rubbish where the bodies response is already written into "therapy" However MRNA is still a valid therapy for cancer treatment. But these cancer treatments are all individualized. So how do they go from an individualized MRNA therapy (even for the same type of cancer in someone else) to a MRNA "vaccine" for everyone. The MRNA technology was simply not designed to do this.
MRNA wasn't by definition a vaccine until 2020 when Webster, all of the other major dictionary publishers, search engines, etc... all decided to change the definition of what a vaccine is. That was Orwell level shit.
With all this information, how does your doctor not know. What he does care about is that his pocket book gets lighter and the oath he took only extends that far.
Yeah, nah, that's a way over-simplification.
(opinion)
The Western medical industry (in general) is a system designed along certain ideological lines and a certain approach to 'science'. That approach seems to be characterized by excessive specialization and analysis, focus on symptomatic issues and data, rather than adoption of a more wholisitic approach that treats the patient as something more than a machine.
To even work, Doctors have to deal with that system, and the ones that can rise above it are pretty rare. I think that the basic majority of doctors that enter the medical system do so because they think they can help, or are helping. They want to care. But, they are funneled into a system that does not have human well-being as its driving priority. It is a system developed and maintained by the sort of (anti-human) establishment corporate structure that has come to dominate most if not all sectors of our society.
Yes, we can easily guess that there are a-holes and creeps who go into medicine in order purely to profit, but is that really what motivates the majority?
Lawyers and Insurance Companies, government nanny laws, and Big Pharma are most of the problem, but still a doctor should know and refuse to do harm.
A lot of us should be doing things that we aren't.
And, a lot of things in this world aren't the way they should be.
It's not easy to escape the world, or the way of viewing the world, into which you find yourself born and raised.
If the doctor thought he was doing harm, very likely he would not be doing it. Doctors have beliefs, too. The evil controllers get many doctors to believe wrong things because it benefits those controllers.
There's a reason why certain forces held control over humanity for millenia.
I don't necessarily disagree but if a doctor can't figure out that shooting nasty chemicals into the bloodstream of babies is harmful, should they even be a doctor?
Also to your 'evil controllers', that's why I said Lawyers and insurance companies, government nanny laws and Bog Pharma are most of the problem.
I agree. If they all rebelled against harmful practices, they would win. But, it would require that all of them rebel.
Similarly, when masks were mandatory, I thought we should ALL refuse. Then, no company or government could have enforced it.
either everyone is innocent except whoever has the most money to coerce people against their will with , or you don't oversimplify and people have personal responsibility and choices that are their own to make.
Thanks for the resp, Framus.
I'll just say that I think you are projecting your own framework of thinking (and understanding) on to the doctor(s), in this case.
"Should they even be a doctor?"
See my previous comment.
I mean, serious question: do you think that you should decide who should or shouldn't be a doctor?
maybe you are just surprised that people can become 'doctors' who cannot see things that to you are obvious. But you should also register the fact that you do not see some things that are obvious to others, maybe?
Anyway, I can see that we fundamentally agree, but I have an inbuilt resistance against judging or evaluating others based on my limited perceptions.
I guess if you framed it like "I would not trust or go to a doctor who I think can't figure out that blah blah..." that's pretty easy for me to accept. But personally, I'm not ready to judge or evaluate a whole community of people based on what I would prescribe for them.
(I mean, "should" is such a strong word, when its coupled with what others should do or not do. I mean, should God love sinners?)
Anyway, I appreciate the response. I think we're basically on the same page, and I'm just going into a nuance in terms of how I think.
Thanks for reading.
Fair enough. There are enough nuances in this to keep us picking nits for a week. After "should", we can discuss what the meaning of "is" is. Yikes!
As for deciding who should and who should not be a doctor, I have to say the people who do decide base their decisions on cash, and they approve of their doctors injecting harmful chemicals into the blood stream of healthy babies. If those doctors are state licenced then yes it's the whole community of doctors and I'm quite ready to evaluate the entire group.
I appreciate the civil conversation and the food for thought.
Kekeke. Well played!
Ditto.
Ever notice how the big pharma company's stocks are always high and doing well, while companies that focus on therapeutics and non-toxic treatments are penny stocks? There's one company whose stock I have, northwestern biotherapeutics, who have an absolutely revolutionary treatment for some cancers. It's using a patient's own cells to learn how to fight whatever cancer they have, which does sound like gain of function, but it would put chemo and radiation in the ground. Their stock IPO'd at almost $1200, and now it's a penny stock.
You tell me if there's a correlation.
stem cell therapy is interesting. very interesting.
to who? think mirror
ncswha
Then companies like that should be priced over $100k per share.
Because therapeutics are about helping the person the long term. Big pharma wants repeat and returning customers aka subscription model.
Longterm. That way you gotta keep paying. They go out of business if their therapy works.
I like your systems approach to understanding how the medical field turned into what it has become. At its worst an on-demand killing machine.
Doc Ahmed Malik is a former British orthopedic surgeon turned medical freedom podcaster who has thought deeply on this subject. He likens medical training to being in an indoctrination program, cult-like in its power. Here is an intro quote from one of his essays explaining how he did not, and only later began to questing his training.
For most of my career, Dr Andrew Wakefield was a figure who had lurked in the periphery of my awareness. I was studying for my medical finals during the MMR fiasco that Andrew found himself in early 1998. Back then, I had more important things on my mind, like graduating and finding a job as a junior doctor. All I knew about Andrew was that he was a disgraced doctor who was ridiculed by colleagues and shunned by the profession. It had something to do with vaccines, which was strange because aren’t vaccines safe?
I look back in amazement. How did I manage to go through 5 years of medical school training with not one lecture on vaccines, their mode of action, ingredients, research demonstrating safety, etc., but still come out of the system with the absolute unquestioning belief that vaccines were safe and a miracle drug? Talk about mind control and indoctrination. Kudos to the Faculty of Medicine. Substack video: Andrew Wakefield And What Really Happened With The Whole MMR Fiasco
It is telling that doctors emerge from education with an absolute belief in something without that belief every being overtly propounded. Rather it is learned and hardened through cultural diffusion.
Oh, Lord! Thank you Fuzzy. You have brought fact and actual experience-based testimony to my rather theoretical commentary.
Yes, if you listen, you hear echoes of this reality all through the system.
Not to be overly trite, but I also watched the whole Scrubs series several times, and even in that comedic portrayal, one sees elements of the system and its impact.
They're brainwashed by the Rockefeller system. Isn't their residency something ridiculous like 12-16 hour days? There's no doing your own research in that time, "time" being a funny word because you barely have time to eat and rest. It reinforces the brainwashing because you can't do anything else.
on the job learning is brainwashing. I've always thought this about apprenticeships. Workers should be able to freestyle more and be creative in their approach. And work less hours. like europeans.
What Swedish said.
Anything but brainwashing, maaan.
Muggy
I sent a screen grab of this story to one of my daughters who has a newborn. They already submitted to having one vaccination ON THE DAY OF BIRTH! i hope they wake up.
submission
even with a doctor for a dad. damnit
Dammit Jim, I'm not a medical doctor!
https://files.catbox.moe/qqifop.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/gws7vw.png
https://files.catbox.moe/4u33ia.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/9wsb2m.jpeg
Our ancestors knew!
"In the future vaccines will be seen for the chronic disease-inducing construct that they are!"
As I've been saying for almost a year and a half now… The "Crimes against children unite all of humanity" is likely to be the vaccine issue.
If you disagree then perhaps you have no clue just how bad "the vaccine issue" is for children/humanity.
What if there's a way to turn people into, essentially, NPCs...?
It will. Not. Be. Pedo. Stuff.
Unlike most of Q's messages, this required no thinking or "decoding".
Q told us DIRECTLY: "It will be your choice whether to know." * Then links pedo code talk *
Ecclesiastes 1:9
The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
Too many people are the sort who simply don't care about it unless their own kid is affected (or they have no kids of their own.) That's why the economy also had to go to shit, they can't keep ignoring their cost of living rapidly rising.
And going back to how many don't care until they're affected, I've seen it myself with a family I knew who were all woke as hell, especially the parents, until one of their own sons went trans and to my surprise his parents disowned him over it. It seems they only cared about being an "ally" as long as it wasn't one of their own family doing it.
You see, not everyone is offended by every kind of lie. So "revealing" that there was a lie told doesn't always really matter to the person lied to.
They can say the lie was for others, but they know the real truth. They can say the lie was a lie for a good reason and had to be done to show people something.
Some people think there is a certain amount of lying that has to be done to get things done. Every parent knows how that is. Lotta parents out there working their butts off and trusting that government is a dirty business and some lies need to be told.
From Grok:
Actually, in Japanese society, you are going to have a much higher rate of compliance with the authority recommended thing that you will in other countries where recommended is taken less seriously.
eg extremely high immunization rates, despite the mandatory aspect being repealed.
Not saying I'm a fan of infant immunization practices, but only that one needs to keep an eye out for confirmation bias.
We should look at the list of vaccines excluded from under 2 years, and compare it with US schedule.. Things might start making sense. Perhaps not all vaccines are equally bad.
What a mess it all is.
I recall watching a film serious about the patriots in the US around the time of the revolution, and how the concept of inoculation was the then cutting edge of medical practice. Risky, but more effective than not.
I think the concept behind vaccines is inoculation, but as soon as it became a big industry driven and controlled by power and $$$$, stuff got twisted and bad.
Off the cuff, I'd say that not all vaccines are equally bad.
Think about it. Plandemic innoculated the Humanity against real biowarfare. Now if they try to start a new plandemic people will revolt. Thats why covid-2 ain't happening.
Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with the inoculation idea. I mean, a couple of concepts play in to that.
The "combat tactics" from Hunt for Red October concept, by turning into the oncoming torpedo, impact was achieved before the torpedo could arm itself.
It seems clear the Cabal was planning on their scamdemic for quite some time, but despite all the damage it caused, it did not really go well for them.
Fwiw, I used the inoculation concept a lot with my kids growing up. I would introduce to them ideas and information about the world that helped them to form a resistance towards a lot of the rubbish, by providing the right amount at the right time and giving them the time to digest it and process it without being overcome by it.
Yeah the Torpedo boomerang from Hunt for has definitely been at play. Torpedos set in motion centuries ago have been turned around against them. Every weapon they wielded against us has been turned against them. Its not just glorious, its humbling to realise that so many things have been happening around us and only now realising wee had been in the battlefield.
I feel like a grasshopper in a battlefield where a fierce battle was raging, and I have been living in a "quiet corner" all this time.
That every single person wears a mask, or so it seems, signals to me, a person quite ignorant of Japanese culture, that they are not disposed to independent thought.
Independent thought is one thing. independent behavior is another. It's really the latter that is key in the case of Japanese culture.
Did you know, Muck, that even in the 1980's onwards, it was very common practice in both Korea (south) and Japan for people to wear these sorts of face masks in the winter seasons? In Korea, it was often for warmth (can get pretty cold with Siberian winds blowing down in winter), but especially in Japan, it was common that if you had a cold, you wore a mask so as not to spread the germs (coughing, sneezing, breathing, etc) to others.
(I know all this through personal experience, btw)
So there is in fact a very different background to the whole Covid era world wearing masks phenomenon. Much, much more culturally normal for Japanese to wear these masks when Covid hit than a place like Oz or the US or Europe.
Not because of a lack of independent thought, but because in Japanese culture, making others the priority, not impeding others or making problems for others, is an extremely highly ranked cultural value.
Thank you explaining this to me, for telling me of the knowledge you have gained from personal experience.
From my read of the story, it is not as much claiming some recent move resulted in Japan's sudden deaths declining as it is calling to attention the fact that at some point in time, Japan changed how they vaccinate children, which seem to correlate with a drastic decline in sudden deaths.
Dunno that the change really impacted on actual practice, tho. Two of my kids were vaccinated in Japan, and we never batted an eyelid, even though it wasn't 'mandatory' by then.
Grok is wrong more than it's right, in my view.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7135324/#:~:text=Vaccination%20became
What the PMC Article Claims
I sent this article to one of my daughters and she immediately sent back a Reuters "news" article debunking this. The question is, is this cessation, or at least reduction, in sids due to just vaccination reduction? The Reuters article said that vaccinations have been going on, but I guess not rigidly enforced like they used to be. The bottom line is, has there been a significant reduction in the number of children receiving vaccinations in Japan, such that the reduction could explain a drop in the sids rate?
You have to be careful when you send something out with intent to redpill a relative or friend that exist still mostly in the dark.
I think it is wise to take the opposite position, the opposing side and attempt to prove wrong, the claim that you are attempting to make to others.
By doing this you come to a more full understanding or the argument at hand, you validate the arguments claims, and you are more prepared to debunk counter arguments.
I'm not understanding this tactic. Can you post what such a comment on this topic would look like?
Use the Socratic method to keep the communication flowing and open. When it comes to younger adults it has to "click". Or as Tao Te Ching says it has to make sense in their own universe and you will grab more water with a gentle grasp.
This is most certainly true, But we cant argue it. I need Japanese sources that corroborate this information.
Primarily The policy the bans vaccination under 2 and the mortality tables after that.
Does anyone have a link to show the study or stat results?
Try this: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7135324/#:~:text=Vaccination%20became
What the PMC Article Claims
Thank you. I am grateful and will pass on the good news.
YW!
Thanks for those key points! I wish I had had them when I brought this up with my daughter. She is now dismissing any further discussion of the topic. The no vaccination before the age of 2 is critical! Another big factor is how they give several at one time here in the U.S.! Nothing like blasting a very young immune system with a big load of nasty chemicals and other things.
I hope/We better see the same here....
What if it accidentally kills the whole Autism Industry?
then autistic children will have fewer resources? parents will have less access to resources for their children?
Then the entire rotten temple has to come down.
Not surprised at all.
Let's end infant circumcision also, and see how removing this trauma from the life of infants affects the men of our society, and the women. Also, no more deaths from bleeding, etc.
lol. there's many, many men around that aren't circumcised. There's entire regions and places around the world where cutting isn't happening. There is no difference in behaviour. Imagine if it was though. A kid cuts his knee and he's ruined by trauma for life. What about those poor poor kids that got spanked growing up? Trauma. Therapy.
Wrong. There are studies about this. Comparing cutting your knee or a spanking to the gross violation of human rights and partial amputation of the penis, often without anesthesia, of a tiny baby is disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself.
oh it's you again. the person that thinks ALL white christian dads with circumscised dicks have been sexually molested and traumatised then go on to sexually assault children because of it. It's not for me to say you should or should not be, but it is obvious you are ashamed.
and btw, im not in the to circ or not to circ argument. My argument was about the absurd notion there would be a society wide behaviour difference because of any minor cut or surgery in infancy.
Cutting babies is wrong, FULL stop. If you don't agree you are enabling severe child abuse in our society.
I wonder if there was also a decrease in the numbers of developmental disabilities in children as well.
Somehow I'm missed the date/year Mandatory Child Vaccines were ended in Japan. And are some infants under 2 still getting some of those vaccinations if parents request them? Confused by SID's "disappeared" in the article.
excellent post article. I hope Sec. of Health RFK Jr. uses this on3 for a public address.
780 is a total testosterone level. 189 sounds like a free testosterone level. Are you sure you're comparing apples with apples?
Total T can be messed up by many different things and it's always a cluster of causes not one thing. I had the MMR and other shots as a kid yet my Total T is much higher than that. I even got it up a few hundred points in several months just by improving my diet (turned out that I was deficient in zinc, magnesium, boron, and not eating enough choline and cholesterol.)
that's not normal. You should get checked out by a doctor.
lotta kids going on hormonal therapies these days. I bet you'll be fine. take care, mate.
and they say it doesnt cause reproductive harm
Damn it man!