7
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 7 points ago +7 / -0

I thought that was fairly obvious, no need for an extended clip.

2
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's truly amazing how God always shows you just what you need at just the right time.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

And by COVID you mean 4 bullets to the back of the head in a suicide via a COVID super spreader party.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without a shadow of a doubt.

5
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's surely frustrating enough to warrant them.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP you have to listen to this thread. It hurts, but it's best for you in the long run. Break it off.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or maybe, just fucking maybe, you could use your brain and use an attack method that won't get you instantly discovered. Or you could just keep being you and be retarded.

0
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Simply because I said one method is a bad method doesn't mean I'm not supporting a different method. Use your brain.

THIS is why we lose.

No critical thinking.

No brain.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +2 / -1

None of these things happen on a gun range, thats the premise of this post

No one was implying that this was made into a legal gun range in this comment thread as currently written. The comments were very clearly speaking of a person who walks up in the middle of the night and goes to town on it with a few hundred rounds.

You need to be more clear next time.

0
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're ENTIRELY missing the point. Shots being fired in a public area such as that is going to get the cops called while you're in the progress of shooting it.

It doesn't matter who owns it - you cannot prove YOU own it and therefore you're destroying another's property. Police showing up to you actively shooting something is ending in you being arrested or shot dead on site.

0
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's a good way to get arrested. There's no way you could destroy it without drawing immediate attention while the task is still in progress.

by BQnita
5
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 5 points ago +5 / -0

If this, "reportedly" claim has any truth to it, it's promising for the Q timeline moving right along... Please Lord, please.

2
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Immune systems are more complicated than that. There are many things that can effect them. C sections vs normal births are argued to be a big factor, in addition to things such as playing in the dirt and being exposed to germs as a child.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not how this works.

2
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 2 points ago +2 / -0

bbbuuh buuubh bbbbuut cnn said they were deboooooonked!!!!!

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sadly this comment reflects the attitude that facts and truth is based on the authority of the people who are saying it.

If you don't think that this applies to the general public, you're ignorant.

You don't need to represent FDA to be speaking the truth. All the information shared here by these folks are true and based on actual statistics that cannot be disproven by anyone.

No one has said otherwise, but that doesn't change how this title is insanely misleading and is likely to make people look like idiots when sharing it if they don't do their own due diligence.

The fact that they are being allowed to share this info in an official, if only as an advisory, setting should be applauded since this makes it easy to get normies to watch it.

It's minor at best. Again, open mic session. It doesn't mean much.

I don't know what your definition of smoking gun is, but there has been smoking guns and fires in the backyards all through out the pandemic. The fact that the main stream hides the smoking gun does not mean it does not exist.

Again, if you can't see the value in stats and facts that the CDC and FDA themselves acknowledge, then you're simply ignorant.

Again, you are missing the point. Its not whether the government is acknowledging his statistics or not. Its the opportunity to allow normies to be exposed to the truth. What they do with it is up to them. They might ask "Did someone disprove these facts?" or they might ask "Did this session affect the way FDA voted?"

Normies have had access to any facts they want this entire time. The fact that they haven't gone after them is only because they trust the, "official sources." It's that simple.

1
c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh without a doubt. Someone else told me that it has more deaths than all other vaccines ever combined, but I don't have a source for that.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›