1
cronoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

TL;DU

At best, he was trying to be a good guy and was targeted on a hit because he was going to say something.

At worst, he was a CEO of a company that made a great deal of money doing broken and sometimes actually evil things, and deserves no sympathy. Just because the Left is celebrating doesnt mean we should be doing the exact opposite to compensate.

4
cronoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only thing I wonder about is the /pol/ classic "what did he know, bros?". This reeks of a hit to me.

Outside of that, I am not surprised that we arent seeing a massive sweeping for the guy. Whether we like it or not, the Left is very good at sleuthing and doxxing people - better than the Right is (and this is by virtue of the Left being largely feminine - anyone who knows, knows that femininity is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy better at research and uncovering secrets than masculinity is).

And a CEO of a mega corporation, of an industry that is broken as deeply as health care in the United States is - all while they are making money hand over first through denying due coverage to patients who dont have the means to legally force the company to comply with the policy (and make no mistake, this absolutely happens - more than you would care to admit) - isnt going to garner a tremendous amount of sympathy from the Feminine Left.

I am a tad bit shocked that the Right is going so hard into defending the guy and his status - like, cmon guys. We dont have to defend people who are making generational wealth overseeing a fucked up industry. Stop defending CEOs of broken industries, and start just focusing on whether or not this guy was trying to maybe do better by it - and was killed for trying so.

You arent going to get an ounce of sympathy from literally anybody playing the "THIS IS WRONG, YOU SHOULDNT CONDONE VIOLENCE OF ANY KIND" card. When shit is broken, people shoot. Dont have to defend it, just ask: was this guy killed for trying to make it better?

3
cronoes 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is my go-to example I give to anyone who wonders if there was any coercion going on with the 2020 election.

4
cronoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

The courts ruled that there was no standing - meaning even if they reviewed all of the evidence and found it true, they basically said that the court had no legal means of providing a remedy.

Now, any judge could have had the courage to say "nahhh, fuck that, i will make a stand here". But likely, that would have led to some REAL consequences, up to and including death. So many just ducked their heads, and went off of "no standing" as means of dodging the potential chaos.

In more than a few ways, it was similar to Bleeding Kansas - where the South committed a great deal of voter fraud, and killed dozens to ensure Kansas became a Slave State. Rather than reverse the fraud, it was largely accepted that it would be better to allow this for now than to start a full on civil war at a stage no one was truly prepared for (my interpretation, anyway).

That set the stage for the election of 1860, when Lincoln was elected with the mandate to clean up the corruption that lead to fraud (and why he ran on stopping the spread of slavery the way it had been happening - largely illegally).

Seeing the writing on the wall, the Democrat South revolted, and the Civil War began.

So we will see what happens now that Trump has been elected on a largely similar platform.

1
cronoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guys. It's okay to not want to see the "bigger picture" any more. Its okay to not want to overthink things into oblivion so that it fits what you have seen on the Q posts or what have you.

It's even more okay to finally be at that point that you just don't buy into anything anymore, except you, your family, and the purpose that God gave you for your own life.

And it's okay for you to see something like this and not classify it as anything other than Democratic Republic of Congo, USSR under Stalin edition.

14
cronoes 14 points ago +14 / -0

It honestly annoys me to no end that we have to find some other means in terms of what is constituted to be an illegitimate election...but that's the game we have to play.

The legal system has obvious short comings when it comes to internal criminal conspiracy.

In the eyes of the Law and the US Government, Al Capone is not an infamous leader of a criminal mafia. He's a tax cheat.

6
cronoes 6 points ago +6 / -0

All this craziness on a list of what seems to be ADL employees, huh? I guess people are afraid of being doxxed.

I mean, the right isnt the left, so. idk about that one.

3
cronoes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everything you described is something that a lot of those in the broader "spiritual community" have been talking about.

More esoteric sources who follow ancient astrology have noted a change in the celestial order in the past few years.

One that I really like, Krasi Attasio, has noted that this is a Mars ruled sub age - meaning it is an age of drawing lines, and showing courage to fight.

If someone can't see things the way you do, then you shouldn't waste the time. Consider them on the other side, and when the shooting starts, don't hesitate if they stand in your way.

Otherwise, you will either die yourself, or be rendered a slave.

6
cronoes 6 points ago +6 / -0

I hate my generation so damned much, you have no idea. A bunch of personal failures that never actually walked on their own two feet, with almost every one not having any real understanding of the dynamic of masculinity and need of it.

It is precisely why they hate the US Constitution - it is the single most masculine document as a base for governance in all of existence.

49
cronoes 49 points ago +50 / -1

Exactly this - they have been running out of time to do what it is that they looked to do. Still, its going to be bumpy, but may the Lord administer Justice to these evil people.

16
cronoes 16 points ago +16 / -0

I mean....literally none of this says that abortion should be a right under the Constitution. But most states that have abortion restrictions have exceptions for situations similar to this one stated.

4
cronoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've been telling people that the moment they went in to steal the 2020 election, they went all in.

This isn't politics anymore. This is war. They don't see the other side as fellow countrymen that they have a disagreement with. They see the other side as an immoral, evil obstacle that they are unwilling to take a gun and blow them in the head themselves.

So they will use the political system as a means to set it up as best as possible so that they can have the military or other powers to do it for them.

Stealing 2022 became assured after I came to that conclusion.

But nah, don't worry, we can just continue to win if we vote REALLY FUCKING HARD THIS TIME

1
cronoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need to realize that once we began to tolerate evil in the office, it became a matter of "what kind of evil is okay" (but only for those that are actually aligned with evil, mind you).

Sex may sell, but it sells far too well here - because the son of a president that has a sex issue becomes a "well, that doesnt really mean Joe Biden did anything illegal as president" - and therefore, excusable.

Burisma isn't excusable. It is right over the target as to why Biden is such a horrible president. The Chinese loans spoken of earlier speaks to the oil issue you spoke about just now.

IE - the sex angle is part of the Psy Op, and we fell for it in 2020, and are falling for it here. Not that it is matters, though, because I honestly think the DS are done with Biden, which is why the oil thing is being reported as it is right now.

4
cronoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am actually still more interested in burisma, 10% to the big guy, the Chinese contracts that indicate they got million dollar loans with zero collateral, etc. way more than I am the sex timeline.

3
cronoes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does it bear any legal weight

About as much legal weight as the EU condemning the SCOTUS Roe v Wade decision.

Is the anticipation that it will bring on a domino effect of some kind, perhaps sway public opinions?

The people that want to avoid a civil war absolutely hope so. Reality is probably more along the lines of this being a drawing of a line in the sand at best, a mere gesture at absolute worst.

9
cronoes 9 points ago +9 / -0

the data parses out in a way that really shows equal effectiveness between not having the vaccine, and being fully boosted.

And, mind us all, that this is only limited to COVID 19 deaths and hospitalizations.

We don't "know" what the impact is with actual adverse side effects attributed to the vaccine.

But we are all pretty sure the numbers look much, much worse for the vaccine if we could add that into the picture.

1
cronoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, we can choose to blow up our civilization and load up our karmic debt in a more culturally sensitive manner fitting for our own neck of the woods.

1
cronoes 1 point ago +2 / -1

Watched the video. Do not think it can be considered a solution, considering the nation is currently undergoing a massive demographic implosion, with abortion likely contributing to that crisis in a significant manner.

An offering to pacify the wrathful spirit of a deceased child and assuage a mother's guilt will not stop the fact that karma was delayed - there is payment to be made in some way or fashion.

Surprisingly short sighted from BPS.

1
cronoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we see q post with da baby?

5
cronoes 5 points ago +5 / -0

It is way more about tempering expectations. The concept of "two weeks" comes from a litany of promised timelines that were never kept.

But it has been bad all across the aisle - no one has been able to keep a proper timeline, left or right. Cabal or otherwise.

It has people like OP and myself saying "Thanks, but this message is not for me, and I will believe it when I see it"

4
cronoes 4 points ago +5 / -1

JUST TWO MORE WEE...er, I mean DAYS BROS

4
cronoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bros could it really, truly be fucking OVER?

view more: Next ›