I agree with everything you're saying except the idea of Russia having superior weaponry. We spend way more on military and we have things like flying saucers and probably soon portable particle accelerator weapons and other futuristic things. But some of those things are probably part of DS endgame plans so might not be used in war until the last minute. It is starting to sound like the Ukrainians may genuinely have destroyed the flagship of Russia's navy, which doesn't look great for Russia if the world goes full force. I've heard that NATO's role in defending Ukraine has been somewhat minimal (I could have it wrong) and they are holding a lot of their forces back in the surrounding NATO states, moving troops around, etc. Possibly waiting for a series of false flags to get people fired up for WW3
Awkward situation, obviously nobody wants DS to win, but if there is a threat to the USA (even if we created it) then I only want the USA to win.
I really hope these midterms go well and we get Trump back soon. We all need to register as poll workers and get out to vote. Even after what happened in 2020 I think that may still be the only way out of this, with a lot of the voting reforms that are going on, exposure of the 2020 cheating, and ever-increasing anti-Dem/RINO sentiment.
The article links to the video they mention, so anyone can debunk it. I guess we'll see in the coming days what kind of narratives continue to come out of Russia. It sure would be convenient for China if WW3 popped off, since winning that is the only way they stay in power with the Evergrande thing.
Most people around here don't care because they think Russia and China are the good guys.
I'm having trouble deciphering what you're saying. Pfizer made the jab without a virus, so the jab is a hoax (obviously). Wuhan says they never isolated the virus (why would they "isolate" a virus that they already created themselves?). For that matter, why would anyone else (in terms of official agencies) bother trying to isolate it if it was (a) irrelevant since all they wanted to do was push poisonous vaccines anyway and (b) doing so would expose both the Moderna patent connection and possibly other connections to the Wuhan lab and parties involved. I don't know about that last one, must have missed that one post that one time on that one day, sorry.
I'm not new here, and I can DEFINITELY tell that you are not new here.
- North Korea's approach to international affairs is basically insularism, while China is trying to be part of a world economy (in fact, they plan to be the leading world power)
- North Korean citizens have zero awareness of, or contact with, the outside world, for them to be influenced
- Democratic leaders have supported the narrative of a madman with nukes for a long time because they use North Korea as a place to do their dirty work, similar to Ukraine. Everyone talks about this big threat of North Korea, but look how small that threat became when Trump came in and simply treated it as not a threat. Various world leaders seem to find North Korea more useful as a political tool than as a territory to be controlled.
- Many people in North Korea believe Kim Jong-un is actually a God
How about a link bro, if you're asking me to watch some random thing and explain it with respect to the well-established fact that China produced the virus.
I don't read Q drops like the Bible so I can't comment on that. But the virus did ruin the entire US economy, just as China had been bribing our politicians to do for like a decade or more. Trump and countless others specifically linked it to China. They even found the actual lab where it was supposedly created and showed both a paper and money trail.
If Trump was cooperating with Xi then why did he basically wage war on Xi during his entire presidency? Which country is it that kidnaps and tortures its own citizens, then harvests their organs? At the olympics Chinese judges rigged the olympics. They kidnapped other nations' people and put them in quarantine. Their own gymnasts are used as sex slaves when not performing. What part of that screams "white hat" to you?
If Q is military and Q is "pro-Xi", then why was Trump "anti-Xi"?
Like I said, I'm not all into this Q stuff, but I figure it is like any large volume of text that is deemed to have some predictive value. There's "enough" in there that you can literally always find something to support whatever theory you want to push. Even more awkward with Q because it is deliberately vague and ambiguous in many cases, as though it were literally designed to support any number of interpretations.
I find it odd that in the last year or so everything we knew was suddenly deemed to be totally false, and the opposite true. I'm not the one who is "forgetting" things. I think people are too quick to point to 1 little thing out of 100 and say "see, this supports it, so it must be true". I guarantee there's some Q drop elsewhere that literally supports the opposite view. But people look at that and say "that must not be true because of this other Q drop". It does really seem lately like there is a coordinated effort to make us all pro-Russia and pro-China, but anti-USA, to the point where we are happy when our own nation is failing because we think it is cleaning up the world.
Here's my theory on Q. Trump, in cooperation with military intelligence, produced a series of confusing Nostradamus-style documents/posts containing enough actual knowledge of current events and events to come that they would be recognized as having been written by the military, and could be used as a way to communicate things they couldn't say openly. Because they could not divine the future, some of it was bound to be wrong, so it was worded in vague ways that could never be conclusively shown to be right or wrong. And then they peppered in some random but meaningful-sounding stuff containing a lot of common proper names and such of countries, world leaders, major players, etc., so they could use those strategically however it was needed. Then they planted people on these forums to guide the narrative/interpretation and make sure we were all on point to help 45 get his job done. And for 4 years this worked like a charm, but now Trump is not in power and there is no longer a guiding hand in the narrative, and people are getting lost in the ambiguous aspects of a handful of contradictory Q posts. It seems highly unlikely that the propaganda arms of the two most famous propaganda-producing nations (Russia and China, who also now are the tightest of allies) would not have taken notice of this, and stepped in to promote the interpretations that were useful to them. Certainly, the idea that the most evil country in the world, who has done tremendous damage to the world and especially the USA, that Trump specifically called out for its actions against us, was some kind of "white hat" and/or a friend to us, seems totally beyond the pale. I don't think it is true and I say that any such interpretation of any Q drop needs some closer scrutiny, and that possibly other Q drops should be examined to see if that interpretation is also compatible with those.
Even with 15% he couldn't get the rest of the board members to agree to ruin their own company.
EDIT: I was wrong about this, catsfive showed that Twitter board owns very little actual stock
Make sure to get yourself banned before you sue
Oppressive governments are constantly in fear of their own people. The Communists promised people prosperity and if they can't keep the economy going (aka "food in people's mouths") then people will revolt. It's not as simple as "order the military (which is also the people)" to kill all of the people. China is totally dependent on their relationship with the rest of the world and if they openly slaughter half of Shanghai then this will inevitably be condemned by the rest of the world. They will face sanctions, meaning no foreign resources. All their foreign support will dry up because foreign powers will know the Chinese government does not have support of the people. China's enemies will stir up revolts everywhere to burn shit down in blitzkrieg-type attacks until there is no infrastructure left.
And how are those Chinese soldiers going to feel when they find out all of their and their families' life investments no longer exist? How can Beijing be sure that the soldiers stationed at all of the posts along Chinese borders will not (in their poverty and discontent) start abandoning their posts or accepting bribes to let foreign soldiers in, etc.
Ultimately, as an organization, China cannot exist without the cooperation of its people.
More accurately, the Shanghai government is known to be a hub of corruption. Xi gave us the virus. The black hats are in the Chinese government. They are not some annoying "rebels" that China just can't quite manage to get a handle on.
China, Zelensky, Biden... these are not white hats in disguise. Believe it or not, we do have actual enemies.
Did Elon say he was trying to buy more Twitter?
It's way bigger than the Biden family
If they were injecting us with venom to break down our tissues wouldn't that kill us?
So now we like Twitter and not DWAC?
fair enough buddy, thanks for enlightening me
You get the briefest clip of a lady in the red jacked on the right side of the screen. It looks like she is pouring blood. Then it pans away from her but she gets back on the screen and goes back inside the train and starts peering around.
The other thing that stands out to me is that nobody is scared.
damn, maybe you're right
I don't want to argue with you or be a doomer. Hopefully Elon is at least neutral. I changed my post. Thanks for all that you do around here.
Actually, that statement literally says nothing about his motives, which I do not speculate on. Whatever his motives actually are, he's not an outsider.
The only "assumption" is that this is another business opportunity for Elon, literally exactly what you actually just said. Glass half full or empty has nothing to do with whether I assume Elon to be some kind of hero. Everyone's trying to win over Trump supporters and Q types, and for me it takes more than just "planting the notion" with an article here and there.
He might do that, if he hated money.
Literally what I said, this is another business opportunity. I never made any assumptions about Elon. Literally the opposite, I am simply pointing out that everyone else is making the opposite assumption.
Are you saying Musk invested a fortune that he intended to lose in order to promote DWAC?
I think he's trying to identify his regime with Jews, but his regime is Nazi from top to bottom. His old comedy routines before he was president were all about the glories of being a Nazi in Nazi Ukraine (I lost the link unfortunately, maybe someone else has it). This seems like some kind of deception to gain support of naive Jews elsewhere so they will pressure their governments to support NATO presence in Ukraine.