I wanna preface this by saying, I’m feeling very confident right now. I feel a resolve, a sense that we are about to witness justice. But to answer your question, here’s some options:

1. a way for Trump to get information out there that’s in classified documents, etc. that he can’t release because of the swamp.
2. There really was a plan, but for reasons unknown to us it couldn’t be carried through.
3. those who are critical of Trump might believe that Trump and others devised Q to undermine MSM and establishment and to develop a cult of personality around Trump. There’s no denying that Q touches on some very real stuff MSM doesn’t cover Here are some scenarios I find UNLIKELY
4. Q IS A DEEP STATE PSYOP Basically I guess you could say the DS is leading us down rabbit holes, having us run around in circles. But I think this is unlikely because, why would the DS want to bring so much attention to themselves? Long before Q, there have been many who have exposed some of the horrors of the DS and Cabal. Why would the DS want to plant info with even a kernel of Truth? That goes against what’s been their MO for years. The DS is highly entangled with MSM (operation mockingbird) and they generally don’t even like acknowledging any of their fucked up operations even when they are very well known “open secrets” (e.g Poppy Bush’s anger at the revelations of CIA misconduct in the late 70s)
5. the second theory I find highly unlikely is the view that the Q movement was just started by some deadbeat Alt Right conspiracy theorist and has no connection to the WH. Reason highly unlikely: the Q proofs simply show that this view is highly improbable. Second, there does seem to be a very real struggle in the IC. You could notice it without even knowing about Q. I certainly did (I’m a real newcomer to Q)
6. And most unlikely of all: there is no DS and we’re a bunch of weirdos. Reason: uhhh, the entire history of the second half of the 20th century and the first 20 years of the 21st. ————- If Q’s plan fails, the struggle is not over fellas.

I was thinking that.

Could someone try to decode it?

The locks being short (.) and flags long (—)?

Or vice versa ?

Worth a try I guess

New to all this Q stuff. I’ve been told the JFK Jr. coming back shouldn’t be taken literally by some Q folk. I know MSM really harps on the JFK Jr. stuff cuz it sounds so wild.

Anyone know what Q drops I should like for JFK Jr. stuff?

Can’t find her telegram

Yeah agreed. The others are puzzling, but Merkel’s leave has been long planned

Merkel has been planning to step down for about it a year now after over 20 years in office. That one I don’t find too striking.

The others are a little but more puzzling

Thanks for that explanation. I can understand a little more clearly now

Don’t want to bog down this site by creating a whole new thread but I was wondering if some of you guys could just help me come to grips with something (my questions following the All Caps below)

I’ve known the CIA is corrupt for years, and that they are massive control freaks (to say the least). And the FBI — don’t even get me started.

Since 2017, I’ve come to the conclusion Trump was at war with these agencies much like JFK was. The deep state.

For a long time I’ve believed Neocons and warmongers are dragging this world down. BUT WHAT IVE BEEN HAVING SO MUCH TROUBLE GETTING MY HEAD AROUND WITH Q:

The pedophilia, the cannibalism, the satanism.

I’m really starting to believe that this Q stuff is the real deal but:

When I first heard people talking about pedophiles and the Cabal. I thought maybe Q people just meant like casting couch type stuff, or like dirty politician not checking a teenage girls ID at a bar that he goes to bed with. Those things are still messed up, but I learned these past few years this movement means the full on abuse, rape and torture of children, often very young. Eating children. Locking women in cages for years. I can’t even believe what I’m reading sometimes.

Sorry to ramble. Main point: why do so many in Politics have these predilections? Is it all some sort of initiation? Why would they put themselves in these compromising situations? I’m sorry if this sounds trite. I’ve never been able to get my head around this whole element of it. Beyond me.

What is the current count (159/4) based on

Huh? Not sure how you got that message at the bottom. Interesting tho

That looks really impressive but I have no idea how to read that. I’m too late to the party to understand half of what I’m seeing on here lol

Could anyone explain what the different colors under different letters in Pompeo’s tweets mean?

If Q turns out to be false, your explanations are among the only ones conceivable.

It’s just too improbably that Q and DJT’s behavior are not coordinated in some way.

Considering it’s found in an article which is very critical of POTUS, I think we can safely assume it’s real.

Now, if people think it’s a photo shop, that must mean it really does send a message

I think most would agree that Trump can be far from perfect and still play a pivotal role for this country

So with any post, there is a significance on the yearly delta ? Like a post can come into play on its anniversary?

Sorry, new to all this. It’s beginning to click but wow it’s a lot

Oh my. Damn. Have been worried whether these people have been able to get in contact with POTUS

What is the meaning behind -7?

That’s Nancy? Huh, she was pretty once upon a time. I guess drinking really does do a number on you. Lol

I voted for Trump twice, but never really knew much about Q until a week ago. When I heard descriptions of it in MSM I always would just think to myself, “huh sounds kinda like Eyes Wide Shut.” That’s a Kubrick film. I’m sure some of you guys have seen it. If not, worth checking out. I did always find it strange Kubrick died the night after it was released, and I’ve always thought JFK’s assassination was not because of “one deluded gunman.” But Q just sounded too far fetched.

But now after learning about some of the Q proofs; and just reflecting on the sheer bonkers way the MSM covers Trump; how deranged the Dems have been for the past 4 years— I thought to myself, “holy shit, there must be something to it”

I’ve found the best approach is to start with the public statements of the prominent Democrats who were critical of Dominion voting systems. It helps solidify the belief that there has been longstanding skepticism of Dominion and Smartmatic

Hey thanks for the detailed response. That was helpful. I appreciate it

Does Sidney Powell have a telegram account?

I tend to agree. If nothing happens and Biden is inaugurated on Jan 20th, formally sworn in, then I’m pretty much going to carry on with my life at that point.

Maybe I’ll keep an eye out for the whole day, maybe even for a couple days after. But if 45 loses the Presidency, that means to me that there was some serious setback in the Plan. It doesn’t necessarily mean Q is false. The struggle could continue in some other form. But without 45 as commander in chief, without the powers of the Presidency, it’s just so an uphill battle from there.

That’s great to hear. I guess there’s a number of us that are newcomers. you have any articles you’d recommend ?

Sorry if I’m a bit slow but, what’s the significance of Nancy not being Speaker in terms of the plan?