Here's the Montgomery v Comey lawsuit, which is just one of many apparently.
https://casetext.com/case/montgomery-v-comey
From the court's opinion:
Plaintiffs, Dennis Montgomery ("Montgomery") and Larry Klayman ("Klayman") filed the instant action against three federal agencies—the Federal Bureau of Investigations ("FBI"), the Central Intelligence Agency ("CIA"), and the National Security Agency ("NSA")—as well as seven current and former government officials—former President Barack Obama ("Obama"), Director of National Intelligence ("DNI") Daniel Coats ("Coats"), former DNI James Clapper ("Clapper"), CIA Director Mike Pompeo ("Pompeo"), former CIA Director John Brennan ("Brennan"), NSA Director Michael Rogers ("Rogers"), and former FBI director James Comey ("Comey"). Compl. [Dkt. #1] ¶¶ 5-16. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have engaged in "ongoing illegal, unconstitutional surveillance of millions of Americans," including high-profile Americans, such as the Chief Justice of the United States, President Donald J. Trump, other judges and justices across the nation, and prominent businessmen. Id. at ¶ 18. Plaintiffs claim that they, too, were targeted by this surveillance based on the fact that their personal and business computers and cell phones were allegedly "hacked" by computers used by the CIA, the FBI, and the Department of Defense ("DOD"). Id. at ¶¶ 43-48, 56-62. According to plaintiffs, the FBI, under Comey's direction, sought to "cover-up" its wrongdoing by inducing Montgomery to turn over 47 computer hard drives containing evidence of the illegal surveillance. Id. at ¶¶ 28-37. They also claim that the FBI has refused to investigate plaintiffs' claims or return the incriminating hard drives. Id.
The general theme of this action is similar to the previous three, and is a veritable anthology of conspiracy theorists' complaints. According to plaintiffs, "each and every" defendant has engaged in "ongoing illegal, unconstitutional surveillance of millions of Americans, including prominent Americans such as the [C]hief [J]ustice of the U.S. Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen and others such as Donald J. Trump, as well as Plaintiffs themselves." Id. at ¶ 18. Plaintiffs claim that defendants have conducted—and continue to conduct—this surveillance "in numerous ways, including but not limited to, bulk telephony metadata collection similar to the now 'discontinued' Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT ACT as well as targeted 'PRISM' collection under Section 702 of the Foreign [Intelligence Surveillance] Act." Id. at ¶ 20. Plaintiffs further claim that "each and every" defendant in this case has covered up the ongoing surveillance "by coordinating 'leaks' of sensitive information pertaining to those who may dare to oppose them or reveal their illegal, unconstitutional activities." Id. at ¶ 28.
Plaintiff Montgomery is a former NSA, CIA, and DNI contractor who has allegedly engaged in whistleblowing regarding defendants' unconstitutional surveillance. Id. at ¶ 33. He claims that, on August 19, 2015, he was induced by the FBI, under the direction of Comey, to turn over 47 hard drives, valued in excess of $50,000, which allegedly contained evidence of defendants' unconstitutional mass surveillance. Id. at ¶¶ 37-38. Specifically, this evidence consisted of 600,000,000 pages of data on over 20 million Americans, much of which was collected on behalf of the U.S. Government on computers supplied by the FBI. See Amended Aff. of Dennis Montgomery in Supp. of Pls.' Mot. TRO & Prelim. Inj. ("Montgomery Aff.") [Dkt. #9] ¶ 4. Montgomery alleges that he only gave the hard drives to the FBI because the FBI expressly promised that it would conduct an investigation of the mass surveillance. Compl. ¶ 38. Former General Counsel of the FBI, James Baker ("Baker"), allegedly assured plaintiffs that Comey was taking "hands on" supervision of the Montgomery investigation, given its importance. Id. at p. 3. Comey and the FBI, however, never conducted the investigation, and Montgomery alleges that they are concealing the hard drives in order "to ensure that the evidence contained therein is not investigated or revealed to the public and prosecuted." Id. at ¶ 39.
Montgomery also claims that, on or around December 21, 2015, he was interviewed under oath at the FBI field office in Washington, D.C. Id. at ¶ 40. During that three-hour interview, which was recorded on videotape, Montgomery set forth the NSA, CIA, and DNI's pattern and practice of unconstitutional mass surveillance. Id. Although plaintiffs have contacted Baker numerous times regarding the status of the Montgomery investigation, they have been ignored. Id. at ¶ 41. Plaintiffs have, however, advised Baker not to destroy the evidence on Montgomery's hard drives or the evidence contained in Montgomery's oral testimony. Id. at ¶ 42. On March 27, 2017, Montgomery sent a Privacy Act of 1974 disclosure request to the FBI, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(d)(1), in order to obtain a copy of "any and all documents that refer or relate in any way to any and all 302 reports of the interview" conducted by the FBI. Id. at ¶ 48. On May 1, 2017, the FBI confirmed its receipt of Montgomery's request, but it has failed to produce any documents to him thus far. Id. at ¶ 51.
Montgomery also alleges that, on an unspecified date, the FBI "raid[ed his] house, [tied him] to a tree, threaten[ed] him and his family, and search[ed] and seiz[ed his] property without a valid warrant or probable cause." Id. at ¶ 34. Montgomery claims that he suffers from a brain aneurysm of which the FBI was aware at the time of the raid, and he believes that the FBI conducted this search and seizure of his home and property in order "to cause him severe emotional distress and potentially cause a fatal brain aneurysm." Id. at ¶¶ 33, 35.
Since these events, Montgomery claims he has been the victim of multiple hacking attempts against his home and business computers, as well as his Apple account, by each of the defendants in this case. Id. at ¶¶ 43, 47. Specifically, he alleges that he has traced the IP addresses of the hacking attempts to the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Systems office in Clarksburg, West Virginia; the DOD's Network Information Center in Columbus, Ohio; the CIA in Washington, D.C.; and the CIA in Langley, Virginia. Id. at ¶¶ 44-47. He also claims that Comey, the FBI, and other defendants have "continued to harass" him, and have "fed misleading and false information about him to journalists . . . to smear [his] name and destroy [his] reputation in order to render him an ineffective whistleblower." Id. at ¶ 36.
Plaintiff Klayman is a self-described "prominent public interest attorney who was the founder of Judicial Watch, Inc. and now Freedom Watch Inc." Compl. ¶ 53.
Klayman alleges that, "almost immediately after" he contacted the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee regarding the FBI's cover-up of Montgomery's evidence, he "received a purported 'software update' on his Samsung Galaxy" cell phone. Id. at ¶ 56. After installing the update, however, his phone "began acting abnormally," and "the battery [began] draining at an exponential rate." Id. at ¶ 57. Klayman allegedly took his phone to two different Verizon Wireless stores, and the technicians confirmed to him that the abnormalities were "not normal and highly suspect." Id. at ¶ 58. He further claims that both Samsung and his wireless carrier confirmed that neither of them had initiated the "software update." Id. at ¶ 59. According to Montgomery, "battery drainage is a tell-tale sign that Defendants have successfully hacked into a cellular phone," so Klayman was forced to purchase a new cell phone to avoid being monitored by defendants. Id. at ¶¶ 60-61.
In May 2017, however, Klayman's new phone began acting abnormally as well. In addition to the battery drainage problem, his phone began "erasing and downloading files on its own and without [his] consent." Id. at ¶ 62. Klayman claims that, according to WikiLeaks, defendants have developed malware that hacks into smart phones remotely in order to turn them "into recording and transmitting stations to spy on their targets." Id. at ¶¶ 63-64. Klayman believes that defendants are using this malware to hack into his phone because they are afraid that "Montgomery will reveal their ongoing conspiracy to the public and that [Klayman] will continue to push for an investigation." Id. at ¶ 66.
Montgomery v. Comey, Civil Action No. 17-1074 (RJL), (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2018)
Thanks for this post. I am interested in Dennis Montgomery from wayback but could never figure out if he was a shill or not. Jury is still out for me. I was especially intrigued by the "Hammer and Scorecard" when Trump had that weird Christmas decoration at Trump Tower Chicago with Santa holding a giant hammer.
Montgomery did sue the federal government a long long time before any of this stuff happened, and there is a separate really old 2004? intellectual property lawsuit where he was under a gag order not to publicly talk about the capabilities of the programs he worked on as a contractor for the government. The feds filed the motion for the gag order. Years later, Lindell intervened in the intellectual property lawsuit to have the court allow Montgomery to discuss the program, as Lindell was claiming that the information would provide a defense to the defamation action against him filed by Dominion.
I also noticed that the Dominion defamation suit against Lindell pending in think in DC was consolidated with similar actions against Giuliani and Powell for purposes of discovery. This is the case he was trying to defend with "the truth" from Montgomery. The judge has discovery scheduled to proceed into 2025.
I am thinking that it might be something that will ultimately be proven untrue, so they can then say "See these people are making the whole thing up!" or "Yes there's trafficking and abuse but it is mostly exaggerated."
Trump alluded to this numerous times, talking about how in the late 1800's there was more money in the coffers than they knew what to do with. There really was no need for the fed. It was a scam.
I trust Nunez 1000%.
That was so ew. I can't even think about that interview without cringing. These "celebrities" are like perverted immature teenagers.
I never got used to going there when Voat got shut down, for some reason.
Funny you should ask...
We have money in more than one place but will be transferring to the credit union my husband has an account with.
Good. Hopefully others did the same.
I love this community. Capital L.
LOL curious minds want to know!
The fact that they spelled Sovereignty wrong in their "Guide to Severeingty" isn't too reassuring either.
https://apnews.com/article/drones-labor-day-eric-adams-nypd-jouvert-c2787e87bcad8fa87aa8d34b454ee6cf
A quick search shows this is being widely reported in all MSM outlets. This is good news I think. Maybe signaling some patriot control. The narrative in the MSM does seem to be shifting to me.
For this guy's sake I hope so. The January 6 prisoners give me a bad feeling about whether Patriots are really in control. I wish they would send really blatant comms to give us some reassurance on this. The 17 helps obviously in this guy's case. The other one that bothers me is Assange.
This is awesome.
Thanks for that hilarious! But also clear that this "what is it for" is a thing internationally. More brainwashing to accept our subservient slave status.
Same here. Just a really strong intuition.
Back before Trump became POTUS I was with my mom having coffee and we were talking about Trump. I think he had just won the primary. At the time I wasn't a total Trumpster by any means, I was still in the matrix, and in the primary had been a "Scot Walker girl" and then leaned toward Ben Carson.
But when he won the primary I thought Trump was kind of amusing and was planning on voting for him in the general. Anyway, while sitting there talking with my mom, I had a super strong intuition out of nowhere and said, "he's going to win and it's going to shock people. And it is going to be roller coaster crazy for awhile but it will be really good in the end." Still waiting for that to pan out completely but hopeful LOL.
LOL I doubt he cares what I think.
Page 3 of the Trudeau Foundation Annual Report with the caption "Learn, Share Change" can be seen here:
https://www.trudeaufoundation.ca/sites/default/files/2020-08/annual_report_2015-16_english.pdf
For those who have access, the clip from True Detective that splices the Trudeau Foundation Annual Report alongside the FBI page for pedo symbols is at 58 seconds of the below Tweet:
Another good one! I need you guys to follow me around and help me out. And I am the proud wearer of a "I speak fluent sarcasm" t-shirt gifted to me by a loved one.
That's for sure.
I WISH I HAD!!!!! The perfect retort.
Just like Patel Patriot says, knowing who Trump is do you really see him shrugging his shoulders and saying, "Well I guess they are going to steal the election and there's nothing I can do about it." No way. The funniest thing about people's perception of Trump is that he is has no self control and is impulsive. He is the most plodding person on planet earth. He truly is a fascinating man.