Exactly. Find people who are on the verge of waking up, send it to them. This can be their push.
My boss had an adverse reaction and was told it wasn't related just a few weeks after he got the jab, as did his wife. I sent it his way. Now I'm preparing (praying) for the questions.
This is the Great Awakening.
He was featured and highlighted by President Trump directly for his work in exposing the media and government corruption. Yes, he's made a difference.
James O'Keefe is a patriot standing up for whistleblowers in ways the Fed can't even pretend or promise to.
They didn't treat people because they were pretending they didn't know the cause of their issues?
Then they didn't report to VAERS because it takes too long??
What the hell?
I had a philosophical debate on a similar topic a long time ago with a friend who (thankfully) just checked out his 20yr DD214. He'd been on several tours, been in a few different levels of the field command structure (from E2 to E7) at the time, and had some experiences that could make skin crawl (even among the awakened). He said something that stuck with me for situations like this, "A soldier follows orders. A good soldier knows when they're bullshit."
I checked the Georgia Code for these laws, and sure enough they're there in Title 16 Chapter 10. 16-10-1 Violation of oath by a public officer, punishable by 1-5 years. 16-10-24 Obstructing or hindering law enforcement officers: Any obstruction is a misdemeanor, while violence or threat of violence bumps that up to a 1-5 years felony.
Georgia defines Obstruction as preventing or hindering an officer from carrying out their official and legal duties. Giving an officer an unlawful order or mandate would easily fit into that definition with absolutely no stretch of the imagination.
I just realized something. The mission this track is from takes place on Sept 19. Hahahahaha
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dZBoiW460nU
Sure thing, broseph. It's one of my favorites. The video has a slight mashup, but this is the better of the two songs.
Corn Dig:
Harvest progress this year vs previous years, per state (note Iowa, Trust Grassley): https://www.agriculture.com/crops/progress-maps/corn-harvest-progress
Iowa Corn FAQ: https://www.iowacorn.org/education/faqs
WHEN IS CORN HARVESTED? In Iowa, some farmers begin harvesting corn by mid-September, though most of the harvest is takes place in October. In a cool year, when the corn matures more slowly, much of Iowa's crop isn't harvested until November. Harvest times can vary a great deal because different corn hybrids take different lengths of time to mature. Even when plants are physically mature, farmers might wait to harvest them until corn kernels have dried further so that the corn can be stored for longer periods of time.
HOW IS IOWA'S CORN CROP USED? Most of Iowa's corn goes into animal feed and ethanol production, but it’s also used to make starches, sweeteners and over 4,000 everyday products. When you think about it, corn is used to make just about everything!
Ethanol? Interesting. What department of the government regulates ethanol? The Department of Energy. https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/laws/ETH?state=US
Which department of the government did Q get their name from? The Department of Energy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_clearance
Great story and reporting, patriot brother. I'm glad you're safe and listened to that little voice that says "this is the way, walk in it."
Remember always that God calls those who are needed for His purposes at the proper times. A few patriots showing up was all that were needed, and it sounds like what needed to be accomplished was accomplished. Praise God!
There is a section of Esther that stuck out to me right before the last time I made a trip to DC. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Esther+4%3A10-16&version=NIV
We're called at the proper time. We shouldn't ignore that voice that calls us. There are reminders to obey conscience and the Spirit over and over throughout the Word.
Don't fret if someone else here or in your life didn't go with you. They may not have had that voice telling them to go. Though, as with Jonah, it'll be up to the Lord to settle them out. In the 1770s, only 3% of the colonial population actually took up arms.
Good work. Remember to pray. WWG1WGA
God wins.
Megalith - Agnus Dei. Brilliant choice of music. I still hear the jets and chatter from Ace Combat 4 every time.
I have a reply below with some added flavor for this, but you're getting great advice here. You did great to drop that truth bomb, and the best thing you can do now is to step away, hold steady to the truth, and wait for them to seek the truth directly. They know you're a source of it, so chances are they'll come to you.
That's exactly how the Bible says to deal with those who are misled by something like this. Give them space and let the Spirit stir their hearts. (2 Thessalonians quoted below, and in 1 Corinthians it says to not participate in any idol worship or their sacrifices).
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Thessalonians+2%3A7-12&version=NIV
He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Thessalonians+3%3A14-15&version=NIV
Take special note of anyone who does not obey our instruction in this letter. Do not associate with them, in order that they may feel ashamed. Yet do not regard them as an enemy, but warn them as you would a fellow believer.
Warn, step back, wait. They'll come to you for the truth when they're ready. Also encouraging all to read the context (and the Word).
I think you should throw a line out to Fight Back. https://fightback.law/contact/
I have a feeling they could at minimum offer some legal advice on how to proceed versus the court, they may offer next steps if the court fully ignores your filing/argument, and they may even have a lawyer in network willing to work to set/use a precedent to lay down some case law on your locality.
Patriots like yourself in situations like your own are how most of these case law protections came about, so certainly worth the convo with them, yeah? Worst case (pun!), they ask for donations and don't have a lot of help to offer. However, Lin Wood does surround himself with patriots (and some paytriots), so you may strike the hot iron and make some serious waves, as it seems you're amped to do.
I'm in full support. Reach out to me however things start to shape up. I'm on here and Gab under the same moniker.
3989's image returns a bunch of Amazon posts, some stock photos, and then a slew of articles about how to display the American flag properly.
4506 may be referring to one of the Flynn bros. Both have been referred to as The People's General.
"Ready to serve again" sounds ominous, when the other *** sound like war and China is parking ships near Alaska.
"The People's General"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_General
People's General focuses on modern conflict in Asia between 20 countries, principally the United States, China and Russia.
K.
China grows stronger militarily. After invading and annexing Taiwan it initiates a plan to dominate all of Asia from Sakhalin Islands and Vladivostok in the east to Volgograd and Kazakhstan in the west; from Siberia in the north to Southeast Asia and Singapore in the south. China justifies this as "reclaiming traditional Chinese territories".
Wtf...
New World Order (4 scenarios)
Who out this Future Proves the Past crap in my 1998 video games...
One year ago, tonight...
That wasn't one year ago. It's off by a week. What else was posted on Sept 24?
Midnight Riders, Ride! INFORMATION WARFARE. Q
https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1309229126692360195 These people are stupid! PAN[DEM]IC_DEM_PANIC Q
*** Not long now. Q
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1309235056934875136 Tracking events? Q
(Archive of Trump tweet http://web.archive.org/web/20201111210228/https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1309235056934875136)
https://qalerts.app/?n=4760 (read this one directly for quote and photo context)
Timing can be derived from picture. Anons have always known. Have faith in your research. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=4759 (referenced post)
Never forget those in the background. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=4758 (view image in post)
(image of Hunters become the Hunted, Red October)
https://qalerts.app/?n=4757 (read post for quoted context)
It is the only way. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=4756 (anon asked if Red October was imminent)
Make your depth 50ft. Zero bubble. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=4755 (read post for context image)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-assumed-parts-of-john-hubers-clinton-foundation-review-source Tracking events? Scope exceeds illegal spy campaign? Why? 7th floor [FBI] team removed/terminated [7th floor is no more]? Normal? What other investigations [same team] 'touch' [alter outcome]? How are other investigations 'bridged' to 'illegal spy' campaign? BIGGER THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE. There is a reason why this was leaked today. The 'Election Infection' cannot stop what is coming. Q
Bonus dig, "***":
*** Are you ready to serve once again? Q
The People's General. Soon. *** Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=3989 (read post for context image)
*** Q
100% correct. Those are Suunto 7s, or maybe the cheaper Suunto 9s.
Several ways to dodge the statute of limitations, if that's what you're referring to.
First, not all charges have the same length of limitation. Some have no limit at all.
Second, when one charge builds or is aggravated due to another, it's limits can be lengthened. For instance, let's say a particular charge (Charge A) carried a one year limitation on it. If you investigated someone else for Charge B for two years and then found out that Charge A coerced them to commit Charge B or that Charge A was a direct precursor to Charge B, Charge A can have an extended statute of limitations (or a different charge that carries a longer limit, like Conspiracy or Racketeering charges).
First, 100% agreement on getting the system straightened out, and if you're looking to do that via this endeavor, I'm completely in your corner. I honestly wish I were a better resource here. However, I know there are several knowledgeable and patriotic attorneys in the US who love these types of battles and can give good legal advice (likely some pro bono and maybe even representation). Lin Wood's groups come to mind, over at fightback.law, for one.
I will say that the 98% win rate is somewhat inflated for a few reasons. Yes, there are fairness and partisan issues at hand (judges wanting to preserve relationships, attorneys swearing to uphold the court, citizens not understanding the complex legal system and laws), but also keep in mind that the prosecution can choose to drop any case they want to. When they do, that number is no longer part of their ratio. Which cases are they dropping? Certainly not cases they think they'll win. (This is one extremely good reason to keep some liability insurance like USCCA, because you can intimidate tf out of a DA)
The phrase about having a fool for a client does not mean that you can't successfully defend yourself, but rather that the average person who did not attend law school will have a lesser understanding about the law than someone who did their time in law school and in the legal system. Even my limited experience in that world yielded insights that were mindblowing, and that was only from the ground level.
Also, one last bit here, just in case you get this absolute gift. If the officer who wrote your charge doesn't show for court, plead Not Guilty. The court will have no witness to call on their defense, and therefore the only statement entered is yours. You'll walk, no fine. 100% guaranteed. It's an awful practice, but it's useless to pretend it doesn't happen: Officers will write tickets simply to hit their numbers (not called quotas anymore) so they'll seem proactive, then let people who pay the tickets without challenge settle their ultimate scorecards for promotions.
I'm not sure that Reynolds vs US is the precedent you mean, but there are some cases outside of martial law where civilians can be tried in military courts. They're rare, and you've got to be pretty much freebasing Traitor coke to get there (unless you work for the military as a civilian contractor, then it's a little easier, but they sign some pretty hefty paperwork just like a serviceman does).
One precedent does come to mind, though. POWs. Q kept hinting (or outright mentioning) the Law of War and 11.3 throughout the posts. Frankly, if the military was viewing the Cabal's actions as a hostile takeover of the US, then their capture could escalate them to a Prisoner of War status in some cases, no martial law required.
Or, you know, 10 days of darkness. Keep some Emergency Mac n Cheese around.
So, we already covered that I'm not a lawyer, but if you weren't served that ticket in person, toss it. Don't acknowledge it. Never speak a word of it. Don't show up anywhere it told you to. For all intents in purposes, you never received notice of it. Note: none of this advice applies if any person physically spoke to you. Specifically, treat any mail tickets like you would those stupid telemarketers calling about your car's extended warranty. Click.
You, as a citizen, have the right to be served any papers in person. This right is fundamental for several reasons, but the most obvious are so that the court has proof that the correct person was served and so that you are aware that you were served. This is also why you'd have been held for 24 hours if you were under any intoxicating substances, to ensure that you had the wherewithal to understand that you had contact with law enforcement and were served notice of court.
I'm not familiar with Richard Cornforth by name, but the concept of Personal Jurisdiction sounds like what I'm mentioning above.
The subject of Subject Matter is one I'm familiar with for the same reasons I'm familiar with courts and cases. Officer Training in recent years has started to train police on how to use their wording effectively to defeat most challenges against SM Jurisdiction. Wording like "I was able to determine so because of my years of experience and expertise on the matter" or "I was able to determine that a serious injury/incident/accident was likely to occur from their behavior if it was allowed to continue, because I have seen numerous such incidents during my tenure as an officer." While this honestly deserves an eye roll in the real world, in the legal one it yields a serious quagmire for the defendant to dig out of.
From personal experience, if you want to beat a ticket, the best defense (if you were served in person) is to show up in traffic court and simply say "I don't think I was speeding." or "I don't understand how the officer could have gotten my speed in that situation. I don't think they got my speed accurately." This puts the onus on the officer to testify and prove that all things were true, tested, and accurate. While many judges will have a relationship with their local LEO to give some slack here, some will take Innocent Until Proven Guilty very seriously and require much more than a story in a report to throw the fine at you.
I got out of a ticket where I (maybe) got clocked on a highway going quite a bit over because there was another truck the same color as mine passing at roughly the same time. From a simple statement and the video, it wasn't possible to determine if they or I were actually captured on the radar (and honestly, I didn't know if I was speeding). When footage was reviewed (this took a while a decade ago, but everything is digital and cloud based now), neither I, the officer, nor the judge could definitively say whether my truck or the other was the one who blasted by at double digits over.
But if you have the $300 and the time, just avoid perjury. No definite statements under oath. Comey style, "I don't know." Make a day out of it. The officer will be there all day for court either way.
If you have the $300 and don't have the time, let the county have their blackmail money.
If you want to file anything with the court, speak to an actual lawyer. There's good reason for the saying "the man who represents himself in court has a fool for a client."
The Hunt For Red October?
The Hunt For Red (commies) In October.
I won't pretend to be a scholar on the issue, but I've done more than a fair amount of study both formal and informal on the law and Constitution, and I do love reading through cases, precedents, and jurisprudence. So, that in mind, I am not a lawyer, and even if I were, I am certainly not the definitive source here.
However, here's my take. When the courts are open, civilian courts always get the first swing at a case where they have jurisdiction. You're always tried in the lowest court possible for your case, and you appeal your way up through the system, thus giving the defendant the maximum chance to provide reasonable doubt or disprove the state's case. To the point further, civilians are never tried in the military courts, where such a robust set of appeals and extra chances don't exist, except in very specific circumstances which are extremely dire to the United States (in the case of Parte Ex Milligan, he fought against the Union and did not meet the requirements, to give you an idea of the height of these reqs).
The Military must have a fast, efficient, and locked down methodology to their courts that focuses on factual guilt and whether the court/command/admirals feel the defendant should be punished in respect for what occurred. This is nothing like the civilian courts, where the primary focus is on the preservation of the defendant's rights and justice as viewed by your peers being served (jury of your peers, objections in courts, Constitutional protections, etc.). When one joins the Military, they temporarily resign these rights for their service term. Civilians have signed over no such rights.
In regards to the plans of the Cabal, my best guess is that they intended to revoke the protections of the lower courts by using the "threat" of Covid and War to close the country, the courts, and the civil administration of the States. This would have satisfied all Constitutional precedent and allowed them to declare full martial law with little or no pushback, and worse while yielding the Military and SCOTUS no openings to object (if they weren't packed out with corrupt justices by then).
To the tune of using federal and military courts today versus the Cabal, there have long been precedents backed by the States themselves for cases which exceed their power and jurisdiction. Cases like Treason, which you mentioned. But also cases like interstate issues, backed by the Interstate clauses, and cases of exigent circumstances and immediate and large-scale threats to the United States (terrorism, sedition, conspiracy, mass destruction). In these cases, not only is the precedent set for civilians to be tried directly by the federal courts, because no single state can claim jurisdiction, but the States have freely given the government the ability to do so either in the original ratification of the Constitution or in subsequent years voted via their legislators.
To sum it up, we were saved when she lost in 2016. Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.
Also, great timing today with the Durham Sussman indictment. Sept 16. 916 | 619. https://qalerts.app/?n=619
Check my comment history for a full deep dive a post or two back.
Mandatory postnumberfag. Sorry, not sorry.
Sept 16, 9-16.
Saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.
https://qalerts.app/?n=619 (mirror)
YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW. Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries? How do you defuse a bomb? Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?
https://qalerts.app/?n=1816 18 = 9, 16
FISA. FISA. FISA. [20] There is a reason why we needed to go mainstream prior to the EVIDENCE being dropped. You have more than you know. D5. WWG1WGA. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=2716 27 = 9, 16
Who targeted NSA re: SURV expose/prevent pre U1 / IRAN? Why are we attacked daily by the largest news co’s on the world? Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct ‘deep in narrative’ mob as method to remove. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=3616 36 = 9, 16
THE GREAT AWAKENING. You are the news now. Handle w/ care. Q
https://qalerts.app/?n=4516 45 = 9, 16
Interesting this was prioritized [routed]. GOOG threat analysis group _entry catalog. Deep dreaming, young dragonfly. Q
Very relevant to current events. HRC, FusionGPS, U1, FISA abuse, high follow Twitter causing DS panic, public taking notice.
Now go take a look at [20] with a quick search. It only returns in 6 posts. https://qalerts.app/?q=%5B20%5D
This is checkmate day. Durham finally moved.
https://tv.gab.com/channel/white__rabbit/view/project-veritas-breaking-part-1-federal-6149223846309a6abb436f8f
It's on Gab TV now.