The idiot kagan also said this. Lol. Preach sister
First, Members of Congress often don’t know enough— and know they don’t know enough—to regulate sensibly on an issue.
And kagans dissent is a good summary too. Lol
Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to “the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.”
This passage is the good part.
the only interpretive question before us, and the only one we answer, is more narrow: whether the “best system of emission reduction” identified by EPA in the Clean Power Plan was within the authority granted to the Agency in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. For the reasons given, the answer is no.5
Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible “solution to the crisis of the day.” New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 187 (1992). But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d). A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
Little fockers
looks like a picture used to obtain ivermectin
agree. in fact it is probable that the vaxxed are more likely to underplay symptoms to prove they were smart to get the shot. (they weren't)
Calling a spade a spade needs to happen more
And the pfizer data
You obciously cannot move past this. Too bad. You have failed to progress your argument as it appears it is somehow now contingent on irrelevent personal information. I had an interesting thought regarding your inability to form a coherent position but it has since slipped my mind.
Retarded bot. As i said. I have and they do. Last chance to break your programming and answer my question
I will try again. one last time. yes they agree. 100 percent they agree, as i have said six times now. are you stuck in a loop or something. I am starting to think you are a bot. i have never had a conversation with a bot before. its very tedious. if you are not a bot. answer this one question. why should their agreement matter to me, or to you. if you are going to continue saying stupid shit, and ignoring my questions then you will get no more responses from me
ive said at least 5 times that they agree with me. you have not moved past it. lots of people agree with me. you fail to see abortion as murder for the same reason you fail at making your points in a discussion like this. you put too much value in what other people think and need to learn to think for yourself. practice critical thinking skills and develop arguments that you can defend intelligently.
time to face reality. your argument is retarded. i said i had that discussion and that they agree with me. ihave now said this multiple times. accept it and move past it. i also said, who cares whether they agree with me or not. it makes no difference. what are you not getting here?
i have had that discussion, as ive said already. but i repeat, even if they didnt agree with me. why would i care? it wouldnt make me wrong. can you not move past this stupid angle you are pursuing? it is a dead end
who cares what they think? can you not handle people disagreeing with you? that is probably why you so firmly embrace all the prerequisite acceptable opinions. critical thinking is not a skill you appear to have.
we have had that conversation already. and just to make a point. if they did disagree with me why would that matter? it would not change my views. what are you not getting here?
you are the one drawing conclusions while ignoring additional data provided by other people. read over what you have written and use your brain.
of course they agree with me. you think this scenario is some gotcha and no decent person could ever disagree with you. but all decent people agree with me. that is what pro life means. How are you this retarded?
of course they agree with me. do you honestly think that there are no women in the world that share my belief? are you that close minded? use your brain man!!! lots. LOTS of people disagree with you. Men and Women.
The women in my life are all pro life and would prefer adoption to murder. A 10 year old is too young to understand the ramifications and she wiill likely feel betrayed when she is old enough to realize what was done to her and the other innocent child
Not all women are retard pro abortionists like you.
Are you too stupid to understand that at least.
Geeze man now you have successfully dragged me down to your level.
Please reflect on the fact that some people are prolife and simply dont agree with about making excuses for killing babies
you know nothing about me. you are pro abortion and i am pro life. continue to spit venom and insult me if you want, it wont make you right and just shows you are unstable and your weak arguments are based on emotion not logic.
okay. keep advocating for murder then. you are beyond reason.
look at the efforts to stop pebble mine in alaska. half a trillion dollars worth of gold and copper and strategic minerals. china and EPA are doing everything to stop it. MINE PEBBLE!!!!!