They are besties still. What do you mean? Is it because they voted differently?
MTG chose to momentarily be more pragmatic about her serfdom, while Gaetz chose to momentarily cater to his voters more. They don't truly care either way (about Trump or McCarthy) - remember, they are both politicians - this is just what makes more sense to them in the short term. They are still besties.
By definition, politicians don't really care about the things and issues they talk about. They just defend or attack the causes that they think will get then re/elected with a target audience of voters. You can bet that when MTG and Gaetz are giggling after his vote, they're actually laughing at having to pretend to care for either McCarthy or Trump.
So when Trump and Musk publicly and explicitly spell it out for millions to see that they support McCarthy, what they truly mean is that they don't actually...
That's a fair bit of wishful thinking, to put it very lightly. To say that whoever thinks this is wholly disconnected from reality would be a more honest and upfront evaluation.
Yeah let's not "jump into conclusions"!
You haven’t mentioned any of the positives
What about this is it a positive or a negative to you?
"He's a mixed bag" lmao...
it’s too soon to fully know his true intention
Yeah way too soon /s
a bit early to draw this conclusion
Yeah way too early /s
Trump isn't gonna "drop the bomb" because he will simply ignore their call for a subpoena. He won't go, and if he goes he will obviously stay in silence (as is his right to do so) because fuck 'em.
And this is why the "How do you introduce evidence legally without MSM interference" narrative is bullcrap.
If deep-state-Google allowed Truth Social in their app store, then that's all you have to know to realize that Truth Social is now a tool for the deep state in their manipulation of the masses.
If Truth Social had any teeth or were able to put a thorn on the deep state's side at all to begin with, it would stay unavailable like before.
The idea that He had to manifest in flesh and had to pay for the sins of mankind means he is subject, and not God.
You're missing the bigger picture here: the main goal of these rules (and the Holy Trinity) is for christians to be able to guilt trip themselves into giving Jesus' death so much more weight than they would be able to, otherwise.
"Humans killed Jesus, who is God's son and also God Himself, and Jesus' death on the cross saved us all as long as you repent and believe in His sacrifice" ---> this tale only has any weight if you believe Jesus truly is God's son and also God Himself (so you believe the "Holy Trinity")... because if not, them this was just some random judaean prophet's crucifixion by the romans thousands of years ago.
But imagine you're a christian who's up there in Golgotha watching the crucifixion of Jesus as it unfolds: the son of God, who you know is imbued with the very spirit of the one God Almighty Himself, is bleeding right before your very eyes and crying "My God, why have you forsaken me?"... as the minutes pass, he's there and he's dying and you're waiting and nothing happens. And he dies.
How do you even begin to backpedal or backtrack from this?... You don't. You double down. Yes he died... he died for me. His death saved us all. He expired all our sins. Now we'll be going to heaven. If we just believe his sacrifice.
In other words "everything that just transpired that would break my belief, I will instead twist and use to re-enforce my belief". You hold on to your belief and you strenghten it in whatever way you can. Or else your whole world fails.
Christianity does not work without the Holy Trinity and these rules that God Almighty seemingly "has to follow" for reasons unexplained. But that is just how mythology goes: it's a buy-in, and you either buy-in on the idiosyncrasies or you don't, based on how much it speaks to you. Thing is, this tale spoke to a whole lot of people. It still does. Why? Do people like the guilt trip? Or rather they like the feeling that "someone loves them so much, that this someone sacrificed himself to save them". I think we can see how that's a very powerful feeling, it's inspiring really - enough to make any miserable person feel loved, and perhaps even make them want to be better. Yes it's objectively a guilt trip, but this is one they feel inspired by. No matter how awful you feel (you are?), there's this big someone who did this one big thing for you, and he saved you. You just feel loved.
Ok but is it true or not?... The answer varies, but bottomline is, that's just how humans are. It's not any different in other religions. Again, that's mythology for ya. A collection of tales that speak to you, that inspire, that you hold on to, for some reason. If the myth / tale speaks to you, then you just shrug off the things that (yes) are illogical.
So Bannon is indeed beating the drums of the fake elections, trying to hype people up for an event we all know is fake. Every other line of his in this video is about the upcoming fake elections and trying to get you to show up and cast a vote in an illegitimate event. Very awkward, kinda suspicious to be honest. Next thing you know he'll be shilling for 2024. I'm open for discussions on this but Bannon is as lukewarm as it gets.
Not that I care about downvotes - if I cared for a faggot-ass score I'd be on Reddit and not here - but you know.
people have the right to choose their Head of State, and not have one imposed upon them.
Completely missing the point. What does "head of state" mean? Well it literally doesn't matter in this specific context, because Elizabeth being a "head of state" has a vastly different meaning than say Trump or Biden being a "head of state". The british crown doesn't head the state in any way that can be compared to how a US president does. For the british monarchy it's currently just another title unrelated to their daily affairs - Elizabeth very rarely 'heads the state', as will Charles. The british Prime Minister is the one actual head of government... but I trust you do know this, you're just acting naive.
To circle back to your statement, "President Trump would (...) say people have the right to choose their Head of State, and not have one imposed upon them", yes, but even though the monarch has the (only ornamental) Head of State title, it's the PM who's Head of State in all things but name, and Trump would know this too.
Whatever the case may be, the matter of fact is that Trump's official statement is that he and his family are mourning Elizabeth's death... and random people on an internet forum (like you and me) can't backpedal on that no matter how hard we want to.
It's a standard twitter troll with a standard twitter prank
- Make a fake account and set it to private
- Run a bot that will tweet "The Queen will die on [date]" thousands of times, each with a different date counting several years ahead (doesn't need to be infinite, she won't live for hundreds of years so 10-15 years will do)
- When she eventually does die, have the bot delete all the other wrong dates and just leave the right one then put the profile on public.
- People won't find the deleted tweets because it was set to private before. Hence they will yhink it's legit.
- Sit back and have fun! People will be trying to decipher your other random made-up criptic bullshit tweets and you can secretly laugh at them.
It's a standard twitter troll with a standard twitter prank
- Make a fake account and set it to private
- Run a bot that will tweet "The Queen will die on [date]" thousands of times, each with a different date counting several years ahead (doesn't need to be infinite, she won't live for hundreds of years so 10-15 years will do)
- When she eventually does die, have the bot delete all the other wrong dates and just leave the right one then put the profile on public.
- People won't find the deleted tweets because it was set to private before. Hence they will yhink it's legit.
- Sit back and have fun! People will be trying to decipher your other random made-up criptic bullshit tweets and you can secretly laugh at them.
...You were saying?