It looks like an arm is blocking the face.
No way, man. Those robots don't move that way. It's obvious that it has no face.
Second in guy in black. I see a stash and he is a bit in the background.
It's just a shadow, man. They have the rough shape of a face, like with an area for the nose, but no detail. Where are their lips?!? It's obviously a robot.
Do your own research.
Here's why he's wrong. He's a former mechanic, not an engineer.
These planes have a higher clearance than commercial planes. These engines are eight feet above the ground. The same engines on a 757 are 29 inches off the ground.
If they were prancing around a 757 with engines on, yes, very likely someone would have been sucked in. But this is a C-17. The engines would have to overcome the full force of gravity to lift a fully-grown man completely off of the ground. This doesn't happen in reality.
The reason is because the range of danger is 20 feet LATERALLY. The range of danger increases ABOVE the engine, and decreases BELOW it.
So, with a 757, a human body's mass is largely at the same level as the engine. For the C-17 it is ALL several feel below the engine. So the ability of the engine to pull in a whole person is diminished by the force of gravity. Yes, the engine CAN do it, but only from probably within a foot or so.
As for the heat, again the ground clearance matters. Also, hot air is less dense than cold air so it expands rapidly and rises into the atmosphere. It works the same way as a hair dryer. Put it on full blast and stick your hand one inch away. It will burn your hand. Move it one foot away, nice and cozy.
The noise level argument is nonsense also. It makes the assumption that all four engines are under throttle at all times. That's not how planes taxi. They give it a little thrust to get the plane rolling then back off to conserve fuel. Once the plane is rolling, the amount of thrust needed to keep it moving is less.
The noise level would only be an issue when the plane needed to ACCELERATE, not maintain speed.
Also, this is military. If they were given orders to take off, they are going to take off. Especially in a hostile environment.
This guy is trying to throw out his mechanic and employment credentials like he's some authority, but he's not. His premises fail to consider basic things like the force of gravity.
It becomes complete vindication.
It will be hard evidence that there is systemic election fraud committed by the Democrat party and/or it's operatives (I bet it is CIA). Biden will be seen as illegitimate to many people even without other states decertifying. The Democrats will be "the party of liars and cheaters" which completely destroys their credibility with independents and moderate Democrats. Their base will never believe it, so they will die on the sword of still supporting them.
MSM will still try to push the "falsely claimed" and "claimed without evidence" narratives, but a lot of people are going to scratch their heads and think "Who's gaslighting me right now?" They will go down along with the Democrat party.
It will pave the way and essentially quash any resistance to forensic audits of other states. No one will be able to say that forensic audits aren't justified because there's no evidence of widespread fraud; just no one is going to buy it. That argument will effectively be neutered (but they will still try). I think this will ultimately shed light on the sheer scale of Democrat election fraud all over the country, in places no one would ever think it exists, that will drain all political clout out of the Democrat party.
... At least, that's what I hope happens.
Okay, son. But you need to frame those questions within the realm of reality.
This video is not of a full-scale C-17A Globemaster III inflatable replica, perfectly proportionate and detailed, that just so happens to have fully functioning panels, landing gear, and a visible turbine. This enormous inflatable replica that rolls along rock solid with nary a wobble or a bounce, all while supporting the weight of numerous full-grown adult men without deforming or shifting in any way.
The premise is absurd. The video is shit quality, making details and contrast difficult to discern. But that doesn't mean it's a fake plane. Everything that you people are stating should be happening actually wouldn't happen in reality. So you're supporting your argument with incorrect premises.
Let me break it down for you, son:
Shouldn't they be blown over?
It depends on numerous variables. In this case, those variables add up to "No."
Shouldn't they be sucked in?
It depends on numerous variables. In this case, those variables add up to "No."
It looks like they're pushing it.
They're not even though it might look that way to some. Like leaning against the back of an idling car that's in drive.
You should be able to see into the cockpit.
Those windows are polarized so you can't see through them from certain angles. Even so, for a few seconds in this video, you can see all the way to the other side of the plane through the cockpit windows.
There are no turbines in the engines.
There are. But because this is a shit-quality phone video with no HDR and very shitty exposure settings, the details in dark shadows gets washed out. You can see the turbines for a brief moment before they go off screen because most of the brighter areas in the frame have gone and the phone camera is able to adjust the exposure up a little.
Stop posting this retarded bullshit.
This stupid fucking fake plane shit... Making everyone here look like morons.
Shouldn't some of these people be blown over by the massive jet engine above their heads?
No.
The exhaust nozzle is around 13 inches in diameter and 12 feet off the ground. So the stream is far above their heads.
Also, the plane is taxiing, not accelerating. So the engines are not under sustained thrust. Just short bursts of 10% thrust or so to keep the plane moving.
Stop posting this stupid shit.
Wouldn't the engines be much louder than that?
Not while taxiing and you're losing a ton of fidelity on that shitbox microphone on that phone with matching shitbox video quality.
Also looking inside the engine looks empty, can't see any rotors like in these photos.
"Looks" empty. But it's not. Again, shitbox phone cameras favor bright light. The shadows are sharp enough here to cause the camera to completely wash out most of the detail in the dark shadows in favor of being able to see the areas lit by the sun.
Here is a version of the video that is slightly (only) better quality that better shows the turbines as the plane passes.
Turbines are there, but you're watching potato-quality video at a low framerate. The turbines are moving too fast to see them on this shit-tier video. You can faintly see the intake cone at the 0:17 mark.
Windows look normal. Take a look at this video starting at 5:14 and you can see, from a similar angle, that the window tinting/coating makes them appear opaque.
So my understanding on this is that the jab has been FDA approved, but because they are marketing it as a different name (COMIRNATY), they are revising this EUA to include COMIRNATY as well.