Just because you don't find them to be personally compelling doesn't mean there aren't other conclusions.
I find that a variety of factors make the possibility that this was white-hat orchestrated the highest.
Another poster theorized it was a trap.
Swearing and name calling make your conclusions less compelling to many anons as they are emotive fallacies.
Fun to see the different interpretations but I'm finding the red carpet/emmy ones much more compelling, with the setup tweets from @USACEHQ. Strong links between that and Trump's "performance".
IMO the biggest reason for this not being some sort of trap is you don't let someone take a clean shot at Trump and hope it works out... Doesn't make a lick of sense.
Event staged by white hats for a variety of reasons, but mainly:
The START (public justification to proceed (clean)).
The clear slop of the SS and FBI here allows them to be investigated and purged for this and prior assassinations they were involved in.
I observed a total narrative vacuum yesterday. The event happened and the legacy media had to write their own headline and had no idea what to go with.
It was like they were expecting something completely different.
Was that why Sisson was complaining about a lack of "water" (information) all day?
CNN1 : JUST IN: Donald Trump is rushed off stage by Secret Service during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania.
CNN2: Secret Service rushes Trump off stage after he falls at rally
Washington Post: Trump escorted away after loud noises at Pa. rally
Focus: Trump escorted off stage during Pennsylvania Rally after loud noises rang out in crowd
MSNBC: Trump rushed offstage at Pennsylvania rally by Secret Service after loud popping noises heard
NYT: Trump Rushed Off Stage at Rally
This post expands nicely on your comment though with the link to the prior day's red castle post & 1304. Great digging.
When things are moving fast it's easy to miss a useful comment. Critical to have info reposted a few times so it gets to people who are on different schedules or missed info or need it presented differently (visually vs verbally e.g.).
I think we're very well off. People awakening at a very rapid pace. In the last two weeks we saw liberals completely drop the legacy media and openly question the FBI narrative on an attempted assassination.
It's possible two men died yesterday. It's possible Ashley Babbit died. It's also possible they were staged events.
IMO the events being staged are a better explanation for the facts and motivations at hand, and also the Q proof we're commenting under, but I can respect if you come to a different conclusion--especially in emotional circumstances where frosty reasoning is hindered.
After a day's review I suspect pretty strongly that it was a staged white hat op...
Massive security failure was necessary.
Shot fired across the field of view to an area where people wouldn't be filming in a position,
Position of shot was perfect for Trump to use a blood packet.
Tiny female Secret Service agent positioned perfectly for cameraman to take a heroic picture of Trump after the shooting.
Witness seeded to do the BBC interview to set the narrative that it was a security failure (this will be used to awaken people that SS/FBI can be corrupt, treasonous and that prior shooting may not have been lone gunmen).
Press had no narrative to run with for hours (seems they are going with attempted assassination finally). No programming was prepared so media was likely not in on it. You must recall how ridiculous the initial headlines were.
Victims coincidentally seem to be tied to Ronny Jackson (yes, the Ronny Jackson that was Trump's doctor). Just the type of people you would want involved who could keep a secret w/respect to the deaths & injuries during the event.
When it first happened someone suggested this to me and I was too emotionally hot to consider it, but after careful review I think any frosty anon would come to the conclusion that this was white-hat orchestrated, esp. w/a Q proof this solid...
Possible. I think it'll become more clear as we see how the various players react to & benefit from the news.
Hopefully provides a relief valve for the Americans who have succumbed to hate programming after nearly ten years...
The "medical emergency" and "no water" comms that were being dropped throughout the day were interesting.. Not sure if they were typical political rhetoric or indications of needing info (no water/no information).
https://twitter.com/harryjsisson/status/1812234403835191803
https://twitter.com/SassiestMinx/status/1812244092346130940
https://twitter.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/1812207859918381478
It's a good metric to check for and these seem like positive indications.
I don't think the journals fixing themselves would be the endgame the white hats are looking for though. Their mechanisms are clearly antithetical to science, and way too many "scientists" exhibit a casting couch level of desperation when it comes to getting published.
There needs to be a public exposure and fallout of the journal and grant systems, with AGs working across state lines to bring those involved to trial.
Can't vouch for it one way or the other but some ideas to consider from Ellie Phillips.
This is a really great connection but my Sidley Austin links aren't yielding much...
^ Hmm, hostile takeover in 1972?
9/11 connection?
^ Savings & loan crisis connection