The secret service email referenced in this link:
...when associated with Q posts by timestamp (2504) and date (293) suggest a possible clue as to what was communicated through the Timberwolf funeral envelopes.
References:
Basic timestamp & date connections. I haven't seen it mentioned before but it probably has been.
There's a group of pro-vaccine professionals from various backgrounds on Twitter who I'm convinced are some form of AI.
https://twitter.com/IanCopeland5
Copeland (cope-land) in particular has stated that you'd never guess where he comes from, that he's "with the Army" and is a "PHD Level Geneticist".
If you visit their space you'll notice some strange and highly predictable patterns to their format. The rules are that the "anti-vaxx" crowd can come up to "debate" the issues, but they must only cite peer-reviewed sources from the "most-respected" scientific journals. They aren't allowed to use any logical fallacies (they are immediately muted and scolded if they do), smaller scale studies, their own reasoning, or evidence from a non-scientific context (e.g. monetary or power motivations).
Conversely--and infuriatingly--the pro-vaxx panel are able to use all of the logical fallacies--and proceed to do so judiciously. They're also permitted to cite smaller scale studies & non-RCT when it's convenient, etc.
In short, it's the most unfair debate format imaginable, and is essentially unwinnable for the anti-vaxx side because no anti-vaxx study would ever be published or funded.
But what I view it as is a white-hat created debate gauntlet. A training ground where white hats can search for new angles of attack based on the outcomes of the battles. What can humans do to give the AI a brain fart in these impossible scenarios?
They also occasionally throw in a bit of bait to make things interesting and give the combatants a bit of help (e.g. the Copeland character was given myocarditis in his 30s but vehemently denies that it's vaccine related).
You have to think there's no way so many full-time professionals would find the time to host what is essentially the same space every day to no productive end. I strongly suspect it's an AI creation.
Last thing:, the AI needs "a link" to begin, and is very insistent that participants in the debate give it a link before proceeding. Imagine an AI that is given the prompt:
"interact a grossly unfair debate for the pro-vaccine side in relation to <link> and issue a <mute> and <scolding> whenever your adversary uses a logical fallacy"
^ With that you have Dr. Ian Copeland 5.
Low key the most hilarious thing is Biden apparently had COVID despite being vaccinated however many times and decided to show up at the debate without a mask, then proceeded to admonish Trump for not taking COVID seriously.
I'm a bit surprised Trump didn't hint at it.
So what if the military already has this tech? What kind of project might have used it? Is an AGI what was used to create the plan for the Great Awakening? Is it why Q always talks like they have a checkmate situation?
Looks tremendously empowering. Much more pragmatic and satisfying than even many of the best regarded Western jobs.
There's something about walking through a neighborhood and seeing the product of your work all around you. Imagine how much programs like this increase the odds of post-incarceration success.
Which do y'all figure is more likely?
-
CNN & the media are white-hat controlled and were in on the whole narrative that Joe was fine and knew it would pivot to Joe was not fine overnight.
-
CNN & the media still have agency and white hats only control Biden, and stealth bombed them with this performance.
-
It's all a coincidence and Joe Biden is real and really screwed up in a coincidental way that had to make everyone shift gears.
Option 1 overwhelmingly feels like the most likely case for me. I can't create the logical wormholes necessary to even fathom cases 2 & 3.
The rhetoric from the judges is definitely in Coomer's favor in every instance that I saw, to the point that they sound as though they're arguing on his behalf rather than judging.
But if true, why isn't Coomer blinging it up and hitting the victory circuit like E. Jean? Instead he's doing kitchen work and keeping a very low profile.
We don't know the terms of any of these settlements.
It's possible the meeting happened. It's also possible it didn't. Where does that put matters in terms of a defamation suit? Plaintiff has to prove malice.
The DUI Coomer video doesn't indicate mad $$$ are coming in. Who is working all these cases for him? Most lawyers won't even have a conversation unless you have ten grand floating around.
It appears he is claiming to not have a copy! There are piles of Coomer cases but it seems like more what they actually had was based on his social media.
Interesting, this court document indicates Oltmann--who was the one that made the claim as to having infiltrated the alleged call--has not produced any video and it's just based on his recollection.
See pg. 13.
. Oltmann acknowledged that he did not have any recording of the Antifa conference call.
Looks like Oltmann might be about to be held in contempt?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61641805/coomer-v-make-your-life-epic-llc/
Sounds like there is an order to compel him to provide the source for the Facebook posts?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61641805/143/coomer-v-make-your-life-epic-llc/
There are piles of Coomer cases active now. Like, too many to even try to count.
This lady and her family set off every gut instinct warning alarm I have.
Would be highly curious to hear from anyone who has Missouri expertise. There are eight candidates on the ballot--which indicates either a competitive race or intentional dilution.
https://s1.sos.mo.gov/candidatesonweb/DisplayCandidatesPlacement.aspx
What is the deal with running as Gomez over Noriega and her brother, Maicoll and Jonathan Noriega? How did he manage to get all the Columbia, Forbes, President of Romania connections at such a young age? What legitimate candidate would have that background? Trace them out all the way to the mayor of Jersey City.
https://twitter.com/maicollgomez
https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Goomez
Jonathan Gomez is aide to @StevenFulop, the Democratic mayor of Jersey City who is running for Governor.
Why does this group of siblings already have a Colombian foundation (Flor de Mayo Foundation / Fundacion Flor de Mayo) and is involved across multiple parties across multiple states? Who does this as a twenty-something as anything other than infiltration?
Is this the Colombian conservative version of the Omar family?
I'd be looking very carefully at some of the other candidates on the ballot because there are probably a couple of good ones they are trying to bury through dilution and distraction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Missouri_Secretary_of_State_election