"THE TALK: Conversations that never took place between people who never met. Created using existing interviews."
This is the pinned comment written by the poster of the video. So, this interview is fake. Should have a Shitpost flair so people know going in, that this is a falsified video.
My theory is that we've had this stuff much, much, much longer than that. Possibly thousands of years, and that civilization gets "reset" every couple hundred years.
Think about it for a bit. Every major invention seemed to have happened in the past couple hundred years. Yet nothing modern could possibly make the pyramids, as the most obvious example. Where is that tech?
Most of our conversations right now are on digital media. This thread right here, and my post responding to it, are on digital media. If the internet goes down permanently, this section of history will be mostly as well. Gone, except in books and memories.
If there is a major fallout that kills 95% of humanity, and the rest are busy trying to survive and repopulate, then within just a few generations it'll be a whole new batch of people to give tech to and let them think they invented it themselves. A new cycle.
How would we ever know? How would future generations know? Even if we printed this entire thread out, what are the chances it gets into the hands of someone 500 years later after civilization has collapsed and the cycle renewed yet again? Future generations will think they invented the internet, just like we currently believe we invented the internet less than 50 years ago. But none of this internet will make it into theirs 500 years from now.
EDIT: Look up OOParts on your favorite search engine. Leads credibility to this theory.
I mean, this looks like an easy one for Facebook. By calling her a prostitute, you certainly disrespected her.
Fight fire with fire, report an orange man bad post and see if that gets removed. Are they enforcing rules equally, or picking and choosing?
Elon mentioned he and Trump had a long conversation before the public interview, and then during the interview at one point Trump said he wants to beat China at AI. Could be that Trump and Elon made a deal in their pre-interview that could have Grok be important coming up soon.
In this particular instance, it seems its filtering to allow pro-trump stances. Since Elon is a Trump supporter now, it makes total sense. It could be that Elon is exposing their censoring by censoring them in such a dramatic way.
While it may be correct in this instance, what people need to realize is, these current iterations of AI are just chatbots. Think Clippy, from early Microsoft products. The only difference is, these have domain knowledge of all of the internet, where Clippy's domain was very narrow.
But, with having all that knowledge, now it'll "hallucinate". That's the technical term for it. Basically, it doesn't actually know anything, it just tells you what it thinks sounds correct in that scenario, which can lead it to telling you that 9.11 is bigger than 9.9 because 11 is bigger than 9, and that the calculators that tell you otherwise are malfunctioning.
Different AI have different filters for how it can answer, but at its core, it's still just a chatbot with the knowledge of a bunch of forums and just answering how a random forum member would. Only it doesn't understand our reality and often substitutes its own.
Answers from AI should never be considered proof of anything. I mean, look at how it draws hands. We certainly wouldn't use that as proof that that's how hands look, now would we?
D5 may represent the square in chess, in Column 4 (D) Row 5. Early game chess often have multiple pieces that can attack that square simultaneously. You want to have more pieces able to attack that than the opponent in order to control that square. I'm not going to pretend like i know chess strategy in depth, but that should give you enough info to be able to research more yourself if you want.
That, and dead people tend to vote democrat.