I kind of feel a bit that way lol. That's basically what I'm imagining. What I can't reconcile with this theory are the 'predictions' or statements of things that would happen, or were reported to have happened, that didn't happen or haven't happened yet. Then we appear to get these 'deltas' in relation to things years later. I think perhaps there were many 'contingencies' that were posted about, some of which are called in to action, some of which aren't. It could also be that a certain level of disinformation was used, on purpose.
it's not nothing, its everything. Read my comment here if you want to know what I think is the truth. https://greatawakening.win/p/16bivsNAnd/x/c/4TvAmfUrPa3
Alright, I've been grappling with this. I'm not even sure that I want to post it because I can already feel the reaction... This is something I used to assume automatically, then wasn't so sure, and am now pretty sure of again. This is only my opinion, please don't hate me but I'll understand if you are upset, and we can have a discussion about it.
Using Santa as the example. He and his team of magic elves, 'Santa's little helpers', make presents for every boy and girl in the world and then deliver them on Christmas night. You've always got that one smart-ass kid that figures it out and has to go around telling all the other kids and spoiling it. I remember how I felt the day I learned the truth...
There is no Santa Clause. But there is the spirit of Christmas and 'Santa's little helpers' are all the parents of the world that engage in the tradition.
And so I've come to believe it is with Q. There is no all seeing, all knowing masked super hero that is Q. There ARE 'white hats' and 'patriots' working together in an organised way, but they're not who some people might imagine they are, and they don't have the power you might wish they had. I've come up with a list of some of the people I'm sure are involved
Steve Bannon (likely the mastermind), General Flynn, Rudy Giuliani, Kash Patel, Dan Scavino jr. and of course Trump.
There are also likely others I am missing, but these are the ones I'm pretty sure about. This is the 'inner circle' of Trump, and there are others more on the periphery. These include : Tim Ballard, the actors in the Sound of Freedom, Mel Gibson and Dana white.
It's very clear to me they are involved and its becoming more transparent.
I feel that Bannon is likely the strategist behind the idea, if not the actual posts themselves. You look at his backstory, and what he believes in, his political ideals. Every subject he covers on his show is 'Q-adjacent' to borrow a phrase. If he's not part of Q then his values and style aligns with it perfectly like a fingerprint.
He is a master strategist and manipulator, he's the brains behind so much of the MAGA movement. His show features all the MAGA stars and topics before they're even mainstream MAGA news. Even his sayings are similar. He always talks of the awakening, fighting the globalists and his famous, '"There are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences".
The 'Q' phenomenon is a kind of ARG designed to redpill people and bring about the 'great awakening'. I feel that if it were revealed that he were the brains behind the idea of part of it, it would ruin the mystery and the fun that made it so compelling. Like if someone caught batman and pulled the mask off and found it was just ordinary old Steve Bannon with his haggard face and greasy look.
So I do believe there are 'patriots' working as a team, that is very clear, and I do believe there is a 'plan' to bring about the great awakening. But I don't believe they have 100% control, and that it is actually up to us. It isn't something that is guaranteed that requires no participation. It may fail and the Cabal may win. The most powerful part is the awakening itself and I believe in my heart it is happening. Q did more for it than anything else and now it is accelerating.
I think it's awesome and I fully support it.
I'm sorry if I just spoiled Christmas for anyone, but hopefully you can see, what I've said is not in contradiction with any of the actual Q posts or the goals of the movement. You may think I'm completely wrong. In any case, let's have the discussion.
I think it's best understood as a team of imperfect humans that occasionally got things wrong, than some omniscient, omnipotent force
I personally think a lot of things went wrong with the 'plan', but there are multiple contingency plans. Disclosure being one of them. I believe that has been activated since Trump's indictment.
This is how I think of it; The 'great awakening' is the goal, the exact details of the plan and course of action are not set in stone. They have plan B, C, D etc with some nuclear options.
This is just how I see it. I'm intimately familiar with Brannon's thinking. His Machiavellianism and propaganda techniques. I'm positive that he is part of this. If I'm wrong it sure echo's his own positions and beliefs as well as methods.
Unfortunately, if you want the biggest reach, that means clickbait titles, using tiktok or similar platforms. If you want to keep your integrity, I do not know. If I knew I would have done it myself.
It could also be that your content sucks and you're not as smart or interesting as you think you are :P
it's only just begun. When it moves to online stream, it's easily 100 million + that it's going to reach
this is fake news. Guys, you need to be better than this. It's off topic and it's literally a stand-up comedian doing a skit. His name is John Crist.
So what if these craft are part of the programs 'outside of public domain'?
ah yes, well sadly that was predictable. If you'd like to ask questions I'd be happy to have a conversation and justify my opinion. Accusing me of being a fed doesn't help us have that conversation brother.
You can handle it. Put your armour and and do it. It's not as graphic as you imagine, but you will cry. You will be outraged. But you will be filled with hope at the end and realise this is the moment we've all been waiting for. Do it if for no other reason to than to see the faces on the normies as they walk out after experiencing the most emotionally powerful redpill our movement has ever produced
Looks like I'm going to be in the minority, but I don't don't believe this latest disclosure push is part of blue beam. Look at who David Grusch actually is. Former airforce Intel, part of what eventually became Space Force. His whistleblowing interview came out at the same time as Trumps indictment and the Biden bribery story. Have an open mind on this one folks.
A lot of you here are going to jump to calling anything to do with UFO's and ayylmaos demonic or fake, but there is a genuine phenomenon and technology that we likely have knowledge of, under active suppression.
as for it being demonic in nature, I think you should consider that if this phenomenon is transdimensional, what you label as a 'demon' in a religious context is effectively the same as labelling a lifeform/being from some other dimension as an 'alien'.
that's what I thought when I saw it lol. Powerful memetics
Would my potential, and yours too, maybe have been even higher and better without it? Possibly.
Would anyone's protentional have been higher had they born into the more privileged circumstance, no doubt. My potential would have been better and life a lot easier if my father hadn't have died when I was 8. My potential would have been higher if had been able to milk the system more in favour during school years and wasn't left to make my own journey of self realisation and initial self diagnosis years after dropping out of university. So many variables. You can come up with an endless list of things that would have improved your life's potential. It's depressing and unhelpful to ask about, I believe.
And besides, who cares? It takes all sorts. Not everyone can be a normie, not everyone can be mega successful. We cannot all be the same, high potential uber humans.
I do see your point though. Most of the 'obviously' autistic people I have met, a small hand full, are in a state that seems utterly tragic and crippling to me, certainly not romantic.
In all honesty, I feel differently about Aspergers as apposed to 'other' forms of autism. Psychologist may disagree, with the changes to the DSM, but I feel pretty distinct from our more 'autistic' brethren. I WISH they had never removed the distinction. For the sake of argument, imagine that a distinction exists. That is the issue here when we're talking about perception of autism, and that is what people are mostly referring to when they think of autism and the other points made about the subject and it's modern prevalence. The more classically 'autistic' autism.
I just wish we could separate the 2 things rather then lump them together, but similarly to what I said before I suppose, If wishes were horses, beggars would ride
I'd say it was a team, and that team is still active. Some are being publicly revealed. Look at who was behind the Sound of Freedom, what positions were they previous appointed to under Trump?
Unfortunately not... I won't disclose personal details, but it would effect our finances negatively to the point we wouldn't be able to afford food or rent.
clarity is in important in regard to optics fren
w-wait, y-you mean... Some people don't live in their moms' basement?
Interesting idea. I'm not an expert on this. I know people have attempted to decode these things in different ways, nothing seems to fit perfectly. I have thought perhaps it's either not for 'us' to understand, but inside comms, or something like that. Or perhaps it's just stylistic, in the sense that it has a visual impact and has the 'super secret insider classified spy information' aesthetic.
my partner and I have been together 10 years, we can't afford to get married. I'd say we have a great relationship, for the most part. I can be very selfish but she is very understanding and we raise each other up in ways we couldn't do alone. We've had no major issues that I can think of in terms of happiness in the relationship. I wish she would look after her health better, but she's never made one demand of me to do much of anything differently. Sometimes I wish she would in order to motivate me, but it is what it is, since you asked...
So the problem with this disorder is, ego. His ego would not " lower" himself to " my insignificant level"
I actually agree, at least I understand the point you are making, and I'm sorry you had that experience. I would like to assume that is not my partners experience nor everyone's experience. I do feel superior at times and it is a problem, but I also have the ability to self reflect, apologise and modify my actions. I can be very humble. It's never been a problem for us, as far as I can tell.
I see allot of the "I" message in your post.
I'm sorry, but I don't know how else I'm supposed to communicate really, I'm giving my personal experience and opinion only, so yes its a lot about "me' and 'I'.
I'm a bit hurt, actually come to think of it, in the way you have addressed me. I don't know your situation or how bad things might have been or what eventually caused you to separate. I'm not going to ask and It's not my business, frankly. neither was it yours to enquire about my spouse. I'm sorry things didn't work out for you. Since we're sticking noses in each others business, might I suggest it may also have been a 'you' problem.
I mean what are you really suggesting? That my partner deserves better than what I can give her? That I don't deserve love or can't be in a mutually committed relationship because of my 'ego disorder'? How do you think that makes a person feel? Don't you think I have thoughts like this all the time and feel like an unworthy piece of garbage? She always reassures me that everything is fine and it's not like that at all. Maybe she's not as high maintenance as you were, maybe her needs are less? Does that make her less than you? Maybe it's just a miracle and we love each other somehow? Maybe I'm not actually a monster? You assumed so much about someone else's relationship based on your own personal experience, likely without considering any of these possibilities. Who has the lack of empathy again?
yes, of her mansion. The cliff was eroding away and she didn't want photos of it getting out.
he's not just some old podcaster guy, though. He is former navy, and worked as an assistant for the head of the navy at the Pentagon. Then he had a stint in banking, then movie making. He's done a bit of everything. He has connections and friendships to people within the military and intel communities. He may not be the mastermind or the top guy but he's definitely connected, I don't think that can be disputed
I have seen the proofs and I have done years of digging both in and outside of this community. You are correct though, there are statements that are hard to reconcile with my theory. I will think about this further.
Bannon is prone to hyperbole and has made statements in certainty of things that haven't come to pass. I followed him 24/7 leading up to, during and after the 2020 steal. He was very sure we were going to overturn it. It's his style, it's what he does. So I mean, if he were Q posting, that's something he would say, without it necessarily being true.
His guests often refer to him as 'admiral' as well. Dual meaning? Naval reference? Q in star trek appears in admiral uniform.
I don't actually want to ruin to ruin Christmas, I actually think this is really cool, if I'm correct. It means it's all 'real' and it's an actual thing, just in a different way than some people want. Real people with real connections to Trump and the official blessing. Surely that is preferable to it having been some random anon LARPing?