4
p8riot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also incorrectly summarizes the SCOTUS ruling on deportation. I get why the WH / Karoline does it, spin is part of the game they have to play. But media (even conservative media) owes it to their readers to get it right, not just pass along the official narrative or sugarcoat things.

11
p8riot 11 points ago +11 / -0

Very obviously AI. Nobody talks that way, and it's missing Elon's little stuttering that he does.

3
p8riot 3 points ago +4 / -1

Losing your man card is loss of integrity- physical integrity in your example. But also spiritually "selling" your soul

So it also extends to those who knew what was going on at these parties but didn't speak up about it.

4
p8riot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesn't Trump use dictation, having his assistant send out all his posts after he says them to her out loud? Fun fact: this type of person is referred to as an amanuensis

1
p8riot 1 point ago +3 / -2

I think it's a fair topic to explore. When there is no COST for energy, it also means there is no barrier to entry for all sorts of insane ideas which usually would be naturally curtailed by lack of resources. What would be the implications?

1
p8riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

"hey, enemy! I can still see the tanks / mines you think you hid!" -- would this make sense on a battlefield, is it worth the taunt to let the enemy know their tactics aren't working?

1
p8riot 1 point ago +3 / -2

I hate to be that guy, but is society actually ready for unlimited free energy? Picture your average American, and realize half are dumber than that. What would they do with unlimited energy, would we be safer as a society?

1
p8riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Foolish of Elon to be throwing away that advantage just to brag about it. Now they'll incinerate the hard drives and bury them in vats of acid instead of deleting.

1
p8riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I understand. Upvotes are usually meant for rewarding true points or encouraging visibility. But so far nothing is corroborated so there is no "truth" or visibility to encourage.

Thus, the mods in retrospect have rightfully tagged this as a "shitpost"

10
p8riot 10 points ago +10 / -0

WTF.. I thought this was a research board. Has nobody actually checked??

The files have not been released. Milei has ordered them declassified the same way Trump ordered the Epstein files released. Neither has happened yet.

The video is clickbait / FAKE NEWS. Notthing has been released yet.

22
p8riot 22 points ago +22 / -0

What I'm most surprised about most is not ONE question, from a SINGLE media outlet regarding the Epstein files at any of the press conferences. The one earlier today would have been a great time to bring it up to Pam with Trump right there.

3
p8riot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn, I will have to look at this thoroughly later. Right away I'm interested in the margins where it says CIA declassified all except bracketed terms. And the only bracketed terms have to do with Israel.

2
p8riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think you understand the numbers breakdown.

10-15% of Jews are Orthodox. Most study Talmudic teachings.

20-25% of Jews are Conservative. Some study Talmudic teachings.

35% of Jews are Reform. Very few if any study Talmudic teachings.

30% of Jews are Secular. Virtually none study the Torah, let alone the Talmud.

6
p8riot 6 points ago +8 / -2

But the very first point is not factual. I'll eat my hat if anyone can provide a link to the PDF and page number that validates the tweet's first point:

The JFK Files define the exact date this group infiltrated the United States with a coup d'etat by killing a sitting President

Here's an excerpt from Grok's response.

If a Zionist conspiracy existed, one might expect at least tangential references to Israel, Jewish organizations, or related figures in these intelligence documents—yet none appear here.

3
p8riot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I got to her first big point about JFK pushing for AZC to be listed as a foreign entity under FARA, which is true. I discovered that they reformed as AIPAC after JFK's death and avoided direct funding thru Israel to avoid FARA. However, she isn't sourcing anything from the JFK files and she hasn't mentioned a single source yet (9 minutes in)

https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_de28bd40-dac3-486a-8370-dbc2ca8ac971

2
p8riot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Candace Owens is an idiot. But if you have a link to that I'll check it out, although I question what you mean by "Jewish sources" and how that is relevant to veracity.

Also, you need to differentiate between Israel and Judaism. There is no Jewish lobby- AIPAC supports loyal incumbents over Jewish challengers.

2
p8riot 2 points ago +3 / -1

I replied about that already to my original comment. Israel continued nuclear research under LBJ, nothing changed so assassinating Kennedy would have been a costly risk to take for absolutely no payoff.

2
p8riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Without America's military and financial support Israel would not be around today. That was my point, not who paved the way. Your friends are saying that America needs to continue to support Israel because again, it would cease to exist. The walls would close in.

America has funded Israel in total since the 50s, accounting for inflation, LESS than we've funded Ukraine over the last few years. There are many reasons why they are considered a strong ally in a region that is a hotbed for Islamic terrorism. Think of it as a military base that we can launch attacks from if we needed, including by proxy. Even just the threat can be a deterrent.

view more: Next ›