2
Paramount 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL....maybe something like this

hat garnisht getun

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

they are using AI to give an example of how its done/could be done.

.

Stuff LIKE THIS happens all through history...characters are created to serve purposes and they are also killed off, either real or staged at some time in the future.....

If you have appreciated their work in the past then perhaps open your mind to what they are trying to explain regarding Kirk from a 40k ft view.....but at least your clicked so that is a start....GL

4
Paramount 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL at He welcomed opposition of decisions....cmon man

1min 4 sec mark

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

I already explained some whys.

You dont believe it then fair enough I understand and I have NOT claimed as a FACT that is the case...

, but please dont be so ignorant as to why WhiteHats MIGHT do it especially on a Q board .

This is 5g warfare and BOTH side are using it to achieve desired goals.

Perhaps this video might help you understand some of the whys, it is long so suggest starting at around 1hr 12 min in and watch at 1.5 speed....

At 1hr 40 min they talk about a faked/staged assassination of a character they created..

https://rumble.com/v6ywhlc-declas-w-rambo-and-dave-60000-ghosts-in-the-machine-913-8pm-edt.html?e9s=src_v1_cmd%2Csrc_v1_upp_a

9
Paramount 9 points ago +9 / -0

I didnt know he was still doing the denial tour

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Miles is pretty much against ALL establishment.....left OR right

I have read dozens of his articles and he has disdain for BOTH sides as he believes BOTH sides are complicit in their own way.

Are you familiar with his work or just this piece?

His research and paper on the Manson psyop is tippy top...check it out if that kind of thing interests you.

Also and I dont know if this is clear to everyone, the author of the substack is Sean Brooks who I dont know anything about.....it is NOT Miles Mathis, whose work is the primary content being quoted by Sean in the substack.

5
Paramount 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you look at this from the 45-47 lens, ie that it was always a military op

Then it really is funny leaving an autopen around so that people could just incriminate themselves by using it........how could they resist

Its like the boss going out of town but leaving a bunch of signed checks for the rogue employees to use for "emergenices"

LOL

3
Paramount 3 points ago +3 / -0

Replying to a mod in disagreement is greifing a mod? I didnt know that....Forgive me, I will refrain replying to you when I disagree in the future.

I prefer to hear all sides of cases, even if one side is written by "the enemy" so if you think the article is bunk yet still leave it up then good.

I dont consider Miles Mathis to be left leaning or a patriot per se, he just researches and writes stuff ....some of it makes sense to me and other pieces dont.....

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok Chomsky, hate speech is a made up word either way..

Same with hate crime.

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pam used poor wording by starting the sentence of with the tem "hate speech". which is a made up word so OF COURSE people will be triggered by it.

Threats of violence are a different matter.

Pretty interesting community note based on this ruling as well https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/

https://i.postimg.cc/2Smq6V4b/Screenshot-2025-09-18-at-09-40-43-Attorney-General-Pamela-Bondi-on-X-Hate-speech-that-crosses-the-li.png

1
Paramount 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, but we also know that large groups of people CAN keep secrets...911 anyone?

IF if were staged then the addition of Frank certainly sells it better since he is a KNOWN person who many wouldnt even suspect since he is a "devout Christian and father figure to Kirk"....from my point of view IF he is truly all those things then he would WANT to be in on it to not only insure it was done correctly but to help sell it properly.

just like ALL the other known entities that would have to be in on it as well ( Trump, Vance and whoever else was necessary)

2
Paramount 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chrisitans dont lie?...If a friend of Kirk's thought that Kirk's life was in danger and it was necessary for friend to convince others that Kirk really died in order to protect him then that is what he would do...especially in the context of helping humanity reach the GreatAwakening.....

Trump is a known trustworthy Chrisitan man but he is required to lie/obfuscate truth to us all the time under the premise of national security and "saving the world"

So no mental gymnastics required, just working out logic and human nature.

4
Paramount 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did anyone ask him about the hand signals?

What were they signaling and were they doing it during the entire event or just around the time Kirk's moment of impact?

40
Paramount 40 points ago +40 / -0

Time to dismantle the Soros side of the Pyramid

2
Paramount 2 points ago +2 / -0

Were they even there are or they doing a reenactment bit of what it might have been like if they WERE there?

After all they use actors to reenact product testimonial ALL the time.

2
Paramount 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not if they never find out

But imagine this alternate scenario...down the road Kirk comes out and explains that his life was on the line and the White Hats faked his death to protect his family.

He also explains that it also led to revolution around the world and woke people up....People would be happy he is alive , the cabal is defeated and Trump and Kirk are heroes......

The would BOTH be forgiven.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›