What's even faster than neuralink?

The "Great Awakening" (Ascension).

Great one!

AI-Generated image.

Military contracts, right?

I'd be open to his argument. The patience of keeping your mouth shut about the really crazy truths is difficult- too difficult for some freshly-unbanned people to handle. Too much truth too fast and you blow the operation.

Sort of like Elon announced a censorship board, then rolled back on that decision, this denial policy might only be temporary.

NOT for sure, just one possibility.

Just seems like Elon is exposing too much be a black hat. And on a scale they'd never want.

Being called a fascist. Just because I want to stop the great reset. I'm trying to STOP a fascist takeover.

Q even posted this verse and said "the world will soon understand."

Eh that's not verbatim. Probably they will threaten to move to Ukraine LOL.

I've also seen:

If Trump gets reinstated on Twitter I am moving to (Russia/China/Iran)

Not sure how twitter makes you feel the need to move, but OK.

Bots.

I've asked kindly already to stop with the name calling, et cetera. My goal is not to fight you or to get you angry.

I've already clarified that my original comment was more general in nature, to be the voice of reason on a fired up thread. People keep referencing this case specifically as some sort of evidence that this should become the norm. But I'm trying to make people aware that it'd still have its drawbacks. I know you are angry, but don't pin defending pedophilia on me. I don't like it just as much as you don't.

I think you are just fired up, and with good reason. I am too. But you haven't advocated any actual procedure(s) that should be followed in response to the concerns I've raised so I don't know what you're even championing for. If you still maintain that you are in fact representing a position for a change in the way these crimes are handled, please clarify the following:

• What would the metric of criteria be for allowing one to take the law into their own hands, bar a trial? Would the person have to witness the incident occurring directly? Would word-of-mouth evidence suffice, and how much?

• How would such a system of governance handle incidents in which things went wrong an innocents were falsely accused and/or killed? Please describe responses to 2 types of incidents, ones in which the rules you listed in my first question were followed properly, and ones in which they weren't.

• Would this system apply to all crimes? Would there be different criteria and answers to the above for different crimes?

• Should the US drop the system of courts and law enforcement, and just go full anarchy a-la wild west? It'd be an interesting concept.

Please, don't overly-reference this specific case or bring up Grabowski anymore in your answers. I'll re-iterate that this is not what my chain of comments was ever about. I'm not trying to be a smartass or give you a hard time. I'll listen to your ideas if you actually advocate something and aren't just fired up at me for attempting to be the voice of reason. I wasn't trying to be a party pooper. I was originally and still am just trying to get people here to realize that just because they liked what happened to this guy doesn't mean that adopting this as the standard won't have its drawbacks and kinks in the system.

KYLE FOR CONGRESS!

Someone mentioned potentially 'Ascension Island' but I also think double meanings could exist.

And I am with you in standing against all the new-agers, etc. I don't think Jesus Christ was just a wise or even ascended master, but rather I believe that he was the son of God / (God in the flesh) and that he died for our sins.

The new agers seem to have a common theme: they want you to denounce Christ. NEVER.

I am open to the idea that maybe this could be describing the rapture, but not the new-age meaning(s) of the word.

LOL You were the first user on here I thought of when I read this drop

Paging u/10LbsBass

I am just as fervorous as you, but I'd be pissed if some idiot killed someone I loved who was innocent.

By this logic, should someone be able to come into your house and shoot you, and get away with it on account of, "I thought they were a pedophile"?

"Oh well, no. There'd have to be some evidence first. A bunch of people would have to come forward and present that evidence."

You mean like a TRIAL?

Which is all I'm advocating. For anything. We need fair trials this country. It's in the bill of rights.

I sure hope people holding ideals like you are killed off in the future. We have no more need for weak willed and ignorant men that continue to allow evil.

How many people have you shot and killed, exactly? LOL

"Letting the court system play out" is how we got ruled by pedos.

Pedophilia is not legal. A few powerful people got away with it- you woudn't be able to shoot them anyway.

None of you upvoting / talking like this would actually go out and do what you're espousing. I'm saying, stop exalting it before you convince a cringe fellow to. Remember the guy who shot up the pizza parlor and made us look like jackasses?

This is not an anarchy. We follow the law.

Sorry about that LOL

I don't want to fight you. Please go easy on the idioms, escalating tensions, or making cracks. We need to be united. Thank you.

Again, I am not so much commenting on this particular case rather than the fact that I don't want people to see OP's post and conjure up dreams of automatic heroism. I want to make people aware that there could be serious unintended consequences if they get all gun-ho about this.

I understand the point about the court system but at the same time prudence and restraint must be practiced. What are you guys advocating, that we just go out and shoot people? You realize we'll just go to jail too, right?

This story aside, you can't just go around killing people on suspicions, is my point. These big-ten-gallon wearers with the "SHOOT YOUR LOCAL PEDOPHILE" business "ain't" right. You could end up killing someone who is innocent.

As I said in another comment, there are instances where immature teens trying to make their friends laugh will just shout "pedophile!" at passerby. When Mr.-Texas-Ten-Gallon hears that, grabs his gun and tries to be a hero before any type of trial or even further investigation takes place, he ends up killing a completely innocent person who was just minding their own business.

I don't like it any more than you.

I understand the point about the court system but at the same time prudence and restraint must be practiced. What are you guys advocating, that we just go out and shoot people? You realize we'll just go to jail too, right?

This story aside, you can't just go around killing people on suspicions, is my point. These big-ten-gallon wearers with the "SHOOT YOUR LOCAL PEDOPHILE" business "ain't" right. You could end up killing someone who is innocent.

As I said in another comment, there are instances where immature teens trying to make their friends laugh will just shout "pedophile!" at passerby. When Mr.-Texas-Ten-Gallon hears that, grabs his gun and tries to be a hero before any type of trial or even further investigation takes place, he ends up killing a completely innocent person who was just minding their own business.

I don't like it any more than you.

I'm speaking more about the general mindset and the bumper stickers that say "SHOOT YOUR LOCAL PEDOPHILE" etc.

I've heard of instances where kids just being silly will yell that term at random passerby, trying to make their friends laugh.

I know patriots are all "HUP HUP YEAH DO IT" but I don't support this kind of mentality.

You should let the court system play out. What if you end up shooting an innocent man?

2nd Amendment

You're allowed to legally speak at a board meeting.