1
propertyofUniverse [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok I've given that one a sticky for a while.

1
propertyofUniverse [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I see, it's a comment thread.

I don't think I could sticky it if I wanted to.

we mods can only sticky our own comments.

1
propertyofUniverse [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't normally sticky gematria. It doesn't normally come to much.

1
propertyofUniverse [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

No worries fren, thanks for your quick reaction to the news.

2
propertyofUniverse [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

No worries fren, thanks for your quick reaction to the news.

4
propertyofUniverse [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

This simplified thinking is exactly the problem.

If planes are covertly producing chemtrails, Will they switch them off over TN for legislation?

2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure Russia is cataloging everything. They already submitted a detailed report on the biolabs to the UNSC .

2
propertyofUniverse [M] 2 points ago +4 / -2

It isn't streetwise for us to talk about chemtrails. This subject area is layed with mines so we refer chemtrails to conspiracies.win where they can de-mine it for us.

Our various sites have different roles in the information war.

2
propertyofUniverse [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks fren.

It's a real wrench to tell people not to discuss certain topics for strategic reasons. We'll get to it in time I'm sure.

3
propertyofUniverse [M] 3 points ago +5 / -2

Fren, we have to be strategic, the area remains a trap for us.

Our policy is for that reason.

There are other sites to talk about chemtrails.

3
propertyofUniverse [M] 3 points ago +5 / -2

We have an issue with chemtrails as a subject area.

It's a very complex topic and within it are pitfalls where we as anons can be manipulated into believing and arguing positions which can be used against us as a movement. In other words, we think it is a trap that has been laid for us just like all the snake venom over simplifications of the vaxx were a trap. Once we make pronouncements in this area, our credibility can be wrecked.

We set ourselves up for a clean takedown of our reputation as anons by the MSM by generalising on this subject.

Think of it as a more sophisticated version of the flat earth psyop.

For this reason, we usually take the strategic position of not allowing discussion on it.

We tried to make the Tucker / Danica post an exception, but we learned our lesson once again.

This is 5G information warfare.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›