I think you would want to diversify. Silver is silver, and paying 162.5% more for the same amount of silver isn't ideal, but U.S. coins would be harder to (or at least are generally perceived to be harder to) counterfeit, so may be trusted for more transactions, plus might be less likely to be confiscated. Get both in a ratio that reflects your personal risk calculation. You might also consider getting junk silver to enable smaller transactions; no sense trading a full ounce of silver for that loaf of bread or basket of eggs if you could trade less.
The problem is worse than your headline suggests. It's not just Yale students, this was a national survey.
"First you let all of the animals out, then you close that barn door up real tight."
Why don't you mix it up a little? Your doom post du jour feels a little stale.
You say that we should read our Bible, but apparently you think we should also just disregard its statements about meeting together as a community of believers.
Not all churches have turned people away for being unjabbed or not wearing masks, so I don't know why you want to just lump them all together.
False dichotomy.
Can you transfer or take a leave of absence?
It's misleading. The platform indicates support for lockdowns, mandates, and passports, but Trump is explicitly against them.
Night vision goggles; darkness incoming?
Memes, when done well, can be good to convey a simple argument, poke a hole in an argument, or simply provoke thought, but I think you're right that actual information is better at changing minds. Memes and infographics are effective as a way of getting a foot in the door, and knowledge makes the sale.
Another function of memes is to boost morale among people who share beliefs, though these same memes can sometimes backfire by embattling those who don't share those beliefs, causing them to "double down" or become further entrenched in their positions.
Is that actually Ezra? His Twitter account indicates that it is his "one and only account."
Must be a Prince fan, sporting that raspberry beret.
New drinking game: take a drink every time he says "QAnon".
More like missed eight turns, and stepped on the gas to boot, if posts I saw here earlier are correct. Supposedly video exists from multiple sources that, when combined, shows that the vehicle traveled through eight intersections first, and eyewitness accounts have the vehicle moving slowly at first, and then accelerating.
Elite athlete in peak condition has cardiac event after getting jabbed. "Yeah, must be online hate."
I don't think we really even have the Drudge Report.
If she doesn't understand the consequences of saying all that she said in social media, then perhaps she wasn't a good fit for the role of Social Media Director.
To access a website/webpage later from one of the online archival services, generally you would go back to the archival service website and enter the URL of the website/webpage that you initially archived. In addition, these services often give you a static URL to the archived page, which might come in handy particularly if you wanted to point to the version of the website at a specific point in time.
I'll preface this response with the disclaimer that I'm not a lawyer and that this isn't legal advice. Depending on your jurisdiction, the amount you'd be seeking in damages would likely determine the type of case (e.g., small claims vs. civil case) and whether it'd make sense to retain an attorney or whether to prepare/argue your own claims, filings, proceedings, etc., and how robust this type of evidence needs to be to be useful. Before it gets too far, it'd probably make sense to contact an attorney (maybe one who offers a free initial consultation) to get qualified legal advice, particularly as it relates to the specifics of your circumstances.
That said, I would think that using publicly available site archival services, including the Wayback Machine available at archive.org, in addition to the sites others are linking here, would be a good idea, as well as possibly taking a video of yourself accessing the relevant page(s). Basically, having proof that the company advertised a particular aspect to their service that it wouldn't be able to hide simply by later removing it from their website later might prove helpful. I believe I've heard that companies can request for archived pages to be removed, so having archives across multiple sites (and a video that is completely within your control) would make it more difficult for the company to pretend that they never advertised those processes, assuming they're not already written down in any other agreements between you and the company in the first place.
Do you need to archive just one page, or an entire site? What kind of content are you wanting to save? Do you want to be able to save just text, text and images, or multimedia also? Do you want to archive locally (i.e., on your own machine/storage devices), or to preserve a copy at an online archive?
His favorite band must be Led Zeppelin, since that idea would go over like a lead balloon.
Sounds like what those in the law enforcement biz call an M.O.
It wouldn't be okay to lie in such a review (e.g., one shouldn't make up a story about getting poor results/service from the business), but I think it'd be doing potential clients a favor to let them see the values, mindset, and reputation of a potential business partner.
Getting slapped in the face usually doesn't prove to be fatal. There is a difference between how to respond to insults/attempts to humiliate and acts of grievous violence.
There is a lot to say about the matter, and I would suggest doing some reading on the topic. One place to start is with this link someone posted recently: https://www.christianpost.com/news/do-you-have-a-god-given-right-to-defend-yourself.html
Oh you.