Bongino went off about it too. Wow he was pissed:
https://rumble.com/v79u6ts-what-is-going-on-here-ep.-2515-05142026.html
Bongino and The Gateway Pundit have both debunked it. It is false.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/just-dni-gabbard-spox-denies-that-cia-raided/
I can tell you first hand this maneuver works. It may have to be done 2 to 3 times before you see results. It's very disorienting at first so do not worry.
We find you do it 1 or 2 times the 1st day. Then one or two times the second day, and that should be all you need.
Depending on activity, you may have to do it once every 6 to 18 months as the crystals move around.
Did you know: years ago MLA standard, and most the rest of everyone, demanded 2 spaces after every sentence typed out. With the advent of typerwriters in the late 1800s, the practice became the gold standard for legebility of the printed form. Readability was king and life was good.
Then came the Internet. As early as 1996, MLA and APA started waffling, switching recommendations between 1 and 2 spaces between sentences. By ,~2000, MLA had pretty well stabilized on 1 space. By 2017, APA followed suit. Why did this happen? Some people will say it has flip-flopped for decades (true), newspapers over the years wanted to save space, some will say woke-ism is to blame (also probably true), and some will say TDS finally hit the last nail in the coffin. But if you are in IT, you know the real truth:
HyperText Markup Language (HTML).
HTML allows you to format your source documents by laying out your documents however you want. Add tabs, spaces, hard returns, whatever it takes to make it legible and understandable. The only tradeoff is, by design HTML ignores anything more than 1 space. If it encounters more than one space, it truncates it down to just one. Every time.
At first scholars tried to work around this by adding code, " ", which would add an extra space. After every single sentence. This was recognized as such a pain in the butt and they finally gave up and instead changed the standard, which is why it is now proper form to space only 1x after a sentence. 😒
That is possible. Jesus was a little younger when he came into existence as human. 😄
Remember though, Adam and Eve they were created already grown up, to some aspect. No reason other humans would have been different.
Just a minor point, we dont know the full amount of time after they were created to when they left the garden, and in the mean time he named everything, which would take time, and seems to indicate the names he used were authoritative, otherwise why would it be mentioned or God have given him the task?
Thusly, it is reasonablle to believe they at least could have been the first, and God would create others after the fact.
I'm really curious to find out for sure how all that played out. Perhaps at some point there will be a seminar or something. :)
Very good chance they were the first (though yes, technically it is possible there were others first). Also, It does not mean they were the last God created, there is that potential.
Likewise, it doesnt say cain and able were the only children.
If the equipment is run right, with integrity, it is very secure.
The only mail in ballots we do is military, medical, etc, you have to request it. If you do you have to submit the early vote by a deadline date before election day. Any after are not counted. And, you cannot vote on election day. All the early votes are processed first thing election day, and you are marked as voted.
No mail in voting, only absentee as it should be.
Irrelevant. Why would they have to repeat our path?
"Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."
Then later we are reminded of this MANY times, one of which is:
"Psalms 115:15-16 15 May you be blessed by the lord, who made heaven and earth. 16 The heavens belong to the lord, but he has given the earth to all humanity."
Just because God made both doesn't mean a shared or similar development path is required. If you want to say God is revealed to aliens, it could be in any form you could imagine.
If you say he is not revealed, what form would that take, a species devoid of religious concept? Maybe they're receptive to discussion or witnessing because they never considered their origins?
No. They are not fact (unless you can provide some concrete evidence). Obama himself, IIRC, did mention that weather manipulation/cloud seeding is happening, but that is not the same thing. Other officials or government types have made similar statements, but not offered any additional, cooberative or explanative evidence.
https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/Contrails#chemtrails
More specifically, as illustrated on this President Trump approved epa website created during the first year of his second (third) term, there is a lot of bad information going around about contrails and chemtrails. At the very least, bad understanding of science. For now this site provides some actually good basic info everyone should know.
Is there something nefarious going on? Possibly, but even if there was, IMO, now is not the time, there are other more important things to attend to (like saving the nation). Once these are done, we can piddle away time and research on other issues, like this one. But for now at least, please not here. C5 has already asked nicely, not here without presenting real evidence, and frankly i agree.
This is more the tale that needs told.
Pharma needs to be removed.. that is where all the incentive and push comes from.
I actually see this backfiring horribly. At least in the short term.
People will be under prescribed for stuff that actually helps. There isnt a lot, but it will go away and that will be just as bad in some cases.
Sure, a lot of cases it will be better, but this is not the way long term.