No, that's the all-seeing peacock
But the video that contains evidence of laundering is from 2018. Given the tweet's explicit mention of money laundering, I am assuming that's the video the tweet is referring to.
What other animals besides goats would you have in a cashmere ad??
Yes it can??? Have you never... What???
You can absolutely love someone with a chronic condition and have a rapid deterioration be sudden and unexpected. You had so many days or even weeks of upswings, that you really thought full recovery was possible. And you also had so many scares... And then the final dive is so fast, so much quicker and deeper than any previous event, and you realize in retrospect how shallow those earlier scares were to the sudden finality of dying. And then they're dead.
It can be both.
Including ones where he is visibly flaunting money he specifically says is from his Dad? Because that's the big deal in the video the tweet was about, which is from the first Trump presidency. If so, tweet should have been referencing those videos instead.
Lmao if anyone adds a fee to Twitter, everyone leaves. No one enjoys Twitter, it's just a national addiction.
So, no one died?
Well, logically speaking, either the white hats are in control, or your theories are generally wrong and no one is in control and we're all just seeing patterns in swirling chaos.
A tweet about a video.
Fail to see how emergency preparedness (which you'll note I said was the LEAST you should be doing, while nodding towards preparing for and building longer-lasting sustainability) is worse than not preparing for any emergencies and assuming unseen actors will save the day for us.
Short-term survival is necessary for long-term survival.
Helpful info!
I did mean like, you have to be more specific when you say "Clinton". It was more a joke at the expense of a crime family than anything else.
Because the wording, to me, very clearly implied that this is happening while Biden was Vice President. That is, laundering cash for his Vice President dad. Which I believe is a reference to the money paid for "rehab".
Yeah, that's exactly my point. If the military intervenes without over half the country being convinced, America falls. Specifically, in on itself. And whoever wins will win being king of the wreckage.
Pedantry you can be proud of
Did AI help in the making of this?
Lmao at only making a derogatory pun name for Snapchat of all things. It's like dissing Friendster.
Note: Celestial Soon is not the same as Mortal Soon
If all your hopes rely upon military intervention absent of votes or court appearances, you might want to start packing now.
Ooh, deja vu AND preja vu at the same time! Tingly
Uh, maybe the best thing to do is to have a plan for the no-plan contingency, instead of only planning on there being a plan? If you think you could be fucked, do something about it. Look into making purchases that would still be useful in a non-broke bad scenario, while they are still relatively inexpensive, such as freedom seeds. At the very least - and there is never a bad reason to do this - make sure you/your family has your emergency kit on lock. Not just first aid, but dry rations, light source, heat source, basic water filtration and test strips. If you have all that, what about your neighbors? Church members? Do the elderly in your community have supplies? Moreover, do the youngins living in flats thinking they'll live forever have emergency supplies?
"Either Politician Daddy wins for us or I give up" is not a plan.
"If he was panicking he wouldn't bother to reassure his loyal base" is a fucking take
Excellent take from 2012 that in no way needs updating to reflect what words are actually being used in such circles these days
It's a lot less "I identify as" and a lot more "I am". There are countless Tumblr posts from like 2014 and before about this exact point, and the language usage has shifted since then.
It is certainly win or bust
So, are you pretending to not be aware of the context or point, are you truly unaware, or are you intentionally removing the context to make things less complicated for you?
Not saying you have to agree with her, but misrepresenting publicly made arguments helps no one find the truth.
Why not?