In ‘89 I was a kid, scared out of my mind watching people shit in the streets of TJ. I also felt bad for the donkey spray painted to look like a zebra haha.
About an hour ago, I talked to 2 guys driving from Michigan to Philadelphia just to get the vaccine. They were both in the late 20’s - early 30’s age range. At that age, you’re probably the healthiest you’re ever gonna be. When I was their age, I was only worried about driving to Tijuana and whether or not I’d end up in a Mexican prison.
We’ve always got to be skeptical but this guy struck me as genuine. Citizen journalist type. Maybe he jumped the gun here but he’s been at this for awhile. He stuck his neck out during the Seth Rich thing and was involved in bringing out the truth on that.
It can be both. Planes (originals, decoys, remote controlled or otherwise) can still crash into the buildings on 9/11 AND news outlets can fudge/fabricate footage (so that it’s dramatic enough for their narrative). I never understood why the planes had to be all real, or all fake, when it would make perfect sense to mix CGI in with real footage.
“EUA’s are effective until the emergency declaration ends.”
So you’re saying the Pharma companies will ensure this “emergency” never ends so they can keep raking in billions?
Don’t forget Dennis Hastert (SOH and Podesta buddy) and Jerry Sandusky (penn state).
I think he’s limited hangout material. Repeats the obvious stuff that’s been around for years (and no longer controversial) but then fails when it comes to Q.
Here’s a good takedown video from IPOT: video link
Touché ?
Nice catch. I watched it maybe a year ago on Amazon prime and it kept hitting way too close to home with all the spirit cooking and walnut sauce talk online. Take out the special effects and it’s the same power dynamic that you see with elite inner circle politics. I missed that detail though. I don’t know if I have to go back and watch it again now, haha.
I agree. There’s a YouTube channel called Black Pilled that did an analysis of Pleasantville saying exactly that.
I mean, how many movies have we seen that make the 1950’s look stupid? He places it in the context of all these movies that try to get people to forget that there was a time (not that long ago) when 1 working parent could afford a house in the suburbs, a car, 3+ kids, and have money left over to put into savings. It would make sense for Hollywood leftists to memory hole that era (and try to make it look horribly backwards).
I’d post a link to the video but I can’t find the video on his channel. He’s anti-Q but to give credit where credit is due, he’s really good at analyzing films.
Or what if it was a white hat operation (like we saw under trump) where they took a CIA-, or state dept - backed militia? I mean, there’s strong evidence to suggest sleepy joe is not in control of the military.
Like the person above said, it’s hard to know who’s who at this point.
Here’s an illuminating clip in my opinion:
He says trafficking is real, but then throws shade at Q people/Trump for getting worked up about it. Then the guy he is interviewing talks about cabal communications using unsent draft emails...just like Q drew attention to 2 years ago during the all the spygate/fisagate drops.
So, Q people are crazy because they believe wild conspiracy theories about human trafficking,...but let’s talk about how trafficking is real. Clown world.
Check out the book The Curse of Canaan by Eustice Mullins. There were parts that blew my mind for how eerily they paralleled the things we see happening in modern times. Also, the Mystery Babylon series by William Cooper adds weight to what you’re saying.
There was a lot there I didn’t know so thanks. Great post.
Haha, I regretted that comment immediately.
If you went through the whole pizza/pedogate thing, that movie is on the nose. Most people will dismiss it as just another nonsense, C level horror movie but when you know what symbolism to look for, it’s a hiding in plain sight thing.
Seriously, for anyone here who hasn’t already ruined their mind with terrible movies (like me), skip it.
For those who can stomach it, Society (1989?).
Knowing what you know now, it definitely feels like they’re just telling you what goes on behind the scenes while hiding behind the plausible deniability of bad cinema and absurdity.
It’s an awful movie on multiple levels. Actually, don’t watch it. It’s sick and the other movies mentioned prove the point haha.
I’m on IOS. I just checked it and it looks like they may have fixed it - as long as I don’t have an official app installed for the linked webpage, it looks like it stays in the “app.” My mistake.
Not complaining because it’s a miracle that this site exists at all, but one minor quibble with the method described above. I still use the regular browser method because even if you use the “app,” it still redirects you to the browser every time you click on a link. If there is a way to keep that webpage in the “app” it would be perfect.
As it stands right now, when I go to clean up at the end of the week, I find that I have 20+ instances of great awakening open, haha, and 20+ webpages open too.
Old joke:
Do you know how they separate the men from the boys in Greece?
I don’t know, how?
With crowbars.
It’s a good possibility. I remember a ways back someone traced this design to Turkish bath houses. Greeks, Romans, Turks, etc. all had these bath houses with the same stripes/arches.
Here’s one from Syria:
Who can say for sure but for as long as I’ve followed those two, I see it in the reverse.
Glenn Beck was actually good back in the day. He was the one who brought the Saul Alinsky stuff to my attention, and the cloward piven strategy. Then he sold out, went semi mainstream and got all kinds of lucrative gigs. It wasn’t until halfway through Trump’s term that he started breaking stuff related to Ukraine.
I don’t follow either of that that closely but Beck kinda redeemed himself with the Biden-Ukraine phone calls he released. That and all the other materials he released were legit Journalism in my opinion.
They’re probably both controlled opposition to some degree but Glenn Beck seemed to get better once Q happened, whereas Alex Jones got worse.
AJ is also the first point of attack when you try to share non-MSM approved info with normies.
“Ha ha, I bet you listen to Alex Jones too!”
(Rolls eyes) “ooookay, Alex Jones much?”
He gets rolled right in with gay frogs, aliens, flat earth, and chemtrails. Not saying those aren’t areas that are fun to research (and that AJ hasn’t done a lot of good over the years), but he is one of the first things that gets thrown back in your face when normies want to shut you down.
And I don’t even listen to him more than maybe once a year. Just because he was good doesn’t mean he still is good. He could’ve sold out at some point and the fact that he tried to hijack Q was a pretty big red flag. So I have doubts whether he’s a net positive or net negative for people seeking truth.
Snowden? Snowden constantly gets invited to do webex calls at Silicon Valley tech events. In the last 5 years, anyone who’s managed to really land a punch with the establishment has been censored, lost their jobs, lost their house, been visited by the FBI, ended up in jail, or ended up dead in a car crash. If you’re really sticking it to the man, you don’t get the celebrity in exile treatment.
How many movies have been made about Snowden at this point? Hollywood and/or documentary style? And how many movies have they made about Q? Q is probably the most interesting thing I’ve ever come across. Why has Hollywood (aside from smearing it) ignored Q or consistently misrepresented it?
I think they ignore it because there is something about Q that threatens the establishment far more than any Snowden or Alex Jones ever did.
Haha, I don’t even care anymore.
After all these years, I couldn’t care less if ET visited us. I just want people to fix the voting systems...
and put an end to human trafficking while they’re at it.
Not sure if I’m remembering it right but is that when he was sitting in Winston Churchill’s chair?
I’m starting to think that most of the presidents they skipped over in school were either straight shooters or totally based haha.
Not necessarily. Q did some say some disinformation is necessary. So the info Q shared in the drops is a blend, and not everyone is willing to do the work to determine what is/isn’t true. Most would rather let someone else (MSM, HBO, WaPo, etc.) tell them what to think about it.
For those willing to do that work, they saw the things they could nail down as fact - think the Strozk/Page texts and their implications - that elements within our own government were actively conspiring against a sitting president. And Q showed us the texts/transcripts to support it. If Q helped provide nothing more than evidence of FISA abuses, that would still be a huge bombshell.
I’d say it isn’t a matter of people “falling for something,” just a failure to nail down what parts were fact and what parts were disinfo. The Q drops are what they are, with tons of verifiable revelations, but speculation by anons didn’t nail the ultimate purpose of it, or predict the endgame.
People want Q to be an oracle of sorts, tell them the future, but that’s incorrect. I think Q was more influential in getting people to ask the right questions themselves. Q pointed people to things like overlooked articles, inconvenient facts, govt documents, that inspired those questions (and the MSM wouldn’t touch).
The MSM likes to shit on Q for being like 80% true and 20% false while they themselves are like 5% true and 95% fake. They do offer neat and tidy storylines where Q is part of the information wilderness. Any normie hatred for Q I think comes from disliking narratives that aren’t neat and tidy and wrapped up in 30 mins or less.