These people are so disingenuous. They start from the position that Q is obviously stupid and go from there. I don't get people who think this way. To me I didn't know anything about it and so I didn't have an opinion about it. Then I learned about it and found evidence to suggest it was a legitimate operation that Donald Trump was aware of. These people assume they know things and then build opinions off of faulty assumptions.
I didn't see the whole episode. But Rush Limbaugh voiced himself on family guy when the family met him. And the dog has this exchange with Rush at one of his book signings. (I'm going from memory here)
Dog: You're an evil man, a liar, greedy, a charlatan and wicked.
Rush: Can I ask you just one question?
Dog: Okay.
Rush: Have you ever read one word of what I wrote, or anything I ever said on the radio?
Dog: Uh, no. Everything I know about you I heard from someone else.
Rush: So why not just read the book and decide for yourself?
(I think the Dog then become conservative for the rest of the episode.)
The truth doesn’t care what they feel about it. It just is. But even if they do feel it’s stupid, they might learn something while they’re here. We need to show compassion for the lost sheep, even when they’re hateful.
I had seen things about QAnon but somehow I really missed it, probably because I hung out at Conservative TreeHouse on the FISA FOIA doc hunt and it was never talked about, at least explicitly. It was Savannah Guthrie going after Trump at the Town Hall that had my ears prick up, but I didn't know how to figure out what it was since by then they weren't allowed on FB, Reddit, or any sites I knew about. I was busy at work and didn't push to find out.
The Friday after the election I stumbled on an article on a Libertarian news site, written by a retired military intel officer, where he said he was convinced that Q was a real military intelligence operation. Since I was an officer, he instantly got my attention, and the Q Proofs video linked in that article clinched it for me.
I am so mad I missed all the fun for the 4 years as I love research and puzzles. But just these 4 months have been hard on me so it's probably a good thing I was oblivious all those years...
Yes it is a strawman. But to me it's a pattern of thinking I notice in SEVERAL areas. This sort of intellectual arrogance in America where people think they know things without knowing anything about it. We're all probably guilty of that from time to time, allowing our assumptions to poison the well of particular topics. I know I was guilty of it when I was younger. A lot of it comes from the propaganda of our country. I thought minimum wage was a "No Duh" policy. When I first heard the counterarguments against it, it blew my mind. It legit like hurt my feelings to accept that it was true. So I'm not saying I'm special, but some people never grow out of it.
I'm reading Adam Grant's Think Again book. He is an organizational psychologist and professor at Wharton. He has identified an "Armchair Quarterback Syndrome". My favorite line in the book so far: "If we're certain that we know something, we have no reason to look for gaps and flaws in our knowledge - let alone fill or correct them." Found in the section called "Stranded at the Summit of Mount Stupid." I am feeding parts of the book to the obstinate liberals on Facebook. Plus, I'm trying to learn how to reach these people that are so set in their ways. I know that I'm now never certain that I know something.
I love that quote, and definitely try to apply that to myself too. That line of thinking is what led me towards libertarianism, questioning everything. Which I think I got from George Carlin. Ha. But even now I don't even think I'm a libertarian anymore, this last year has made me question it. I'm not sure exactly where I fall anymore. I don't think every solution is about the government or type of government you have. I think the morality of the people and their values is even more important.
Firstly, you're in for a treat. The Q "project", or whatever you want to call it, is one of the most compelling literary events in world history.
It's a mixture of questions, news, puzzles, whistle-blowing, trolling, misinformation, hope, and humor. If it's true, it's the most important project of our lifetimes and will unite our country against a group of people committing crimes against humanity through our government.
Agreed that the absolute best place to investigate Q for yourself is the original Q posts. Visit Anon sites to help fill in your understanding and as always, never disengage your skepticism or critical thinking.
Feel free to post your analysis of Q posts in relation to current events, and thank you for taking the time to research Q for yourself.
If it's true, it's the most important project of our lifetimes
That is a very profound statement. Either the "Q Project" is true or it is false.
If it is false, then a lot of people fell for something that was false. That is no great crime, considering how compelling and full of seemingly proven information was presented. Not a big deal, in the overall scheme of things.
But if it is true, then it is the single most important historical event in our lifetimes. Think of the millions of people who are completely unaware of this important event. Think of the millions more who are vaguely aware, but who actively refuse to look into it -- the most important historical even of THEIR life -- not because they are knowledgable and reject it, but because they are IGNORANT and someone ELSE told them to STAY IGNORANT about it.
Not necessarily. Q did some say some disinformation is necessary. So the info Q shared in the drops is a blend, and not everyone is willing to do the work to determine what is/isn’t true. Most would rather let someone else (MSM, HBO, WaPo, etc.) tell them what to think about it.
For those willing to do that work, they saw the things they could nail down as fact - think the Strozk/Page texts and their implications - that elements within our own government were actively conspiring against a sitting president. And Q showed us the texts/transcripts to support it. If Q helped provide nothing more than evidence of FISA abuses, that would still be a huge bombshell.
I’d say it isn’t a matter of people “falling for something,” just a failure to nail down what parts were fact and what parts were disinfo. The Q drops are what they are, with tons of verifiable revelations, but speculation by anons didn’t nail the ultimate purpose of it, or predict the endgame.
People want Q to be an oracle of sorts, tell them the future, but that’s incorrect. I think Q was more influential in getting people to ask the right questions themselves. Q pointed people to things like overlooked articles, inconvenient facts, govt documents, that inspired those questions (and the MSM wouldn’t touch).
The MSM likes to shit on Q for being like 80% true and 20% false while they themselves are like 5% true and 95% fake. They do offer neat and tidy storylines where Q is part of the information wilderness. Any normie hatred for Q I think comes from disliking narratives that aren’t neat and tidy and wrapped up in 30 mins or less.
The Q posts were questions that people didn't consider previously coupled with the declarative statements which are where the necessary disinfo was seeded imo. It was the research that followed that lead to the truth. Q would occasionally confirm that anons were on the mark, or suggest they keep digging or put more time into working something out. For the first timer or person that is going through the posts, they can be a little confusing as a lot of the posts are not based on a chronological order, hell they were confusing to everyone following them at the time they were coming out. People worked together, brought what they found and it was refined over time, sort of a forge of truth. If someone is new, I suggest the route of looking at what others have put together for a crash course. The updated book of Q, there are a couple of really good vids, especially the one by the British guy(I'll add his channel name later). Use them as a primer then jump in and start your own research.
The greatawakening operation has been happening in phases. My personal feeling is that this was in the planning phase since the early 70's. The actual initialization phase was probably started late 80's early 90's. I think Trump has known about this for a LONG time, I doubt he was recruited in the run up to the 2016 election. I think we're in the last phase now, our job is to prepare everyone we can for the upcoming reveal. This last phase might take a while frankly, there is only so much horror, revulsion, anger, rage that a person can take. This last phase is going to be done in parts as well, it's just the logical way to handle things.
Ive been browsing this site for months. If this was a "cult" it's the worst cult I've ever seen. Remember: they like to project. Alot. Painfully alot. Im surprised the progressive communists haven't gone full Jim Jones yet.
and make sure you read over the actual Q posts. That doc seems better than most, but they were still conflating some things, muddying the waters, etc. No, the storm wasn't the fake storming of the capitol. And those memes of people hanging were NOT posted by Q. I thought that adding those memes in episode 1 was very disingenuous.
Oh and also, Q hasn't posted on 8chan in years. The segment talking about that had to be from 2019 or prior.
Hulubisboffering a 30 day free trial.
You can add a 7 day free trial of HBO.
Then you cn immediatwly cancel both plans amd have 7 days to watch HBo stuff, 30 to watch Hulu
Q and the Anons are NOT a cult. "We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES."
These people are so disingenuous. They start from the position that Q is obviously stupid and go from there. I don't get people who think this way. To me I didn't know anything about it and so I didn't have an opinion about it. Then I learned about it and found evidence to suggest it was a legitimate operation that Donald Trump was aware of. These people assume they know things and then build opinions off of faulty assumptions.
You've just described a great many people.
I didn't see the whole episode. But Rush Limbaugh voiced himself on family guy when the family met him. And the dog has this exchange with Rush at one of his book signings. (I'm going from memory here)
Dog: You're an evil man, a liar, greedy, a charlatan and wicked.
Rush: Can I ask you just one question?
Dog: Okay.
Rush: Have you ever read one word of what I wrote, or anything I ever said on the radio?
Dog: Uh, no. Everything I know about you I heard from someone else.
Rush: So why not just read the book and decide for yourself?
(I think the Dog then become conservative for the rest of the episode.)
I think that was an actual conversation McFarlane had with Rush and they just reenacted it on the show.
Is it? That's even better.
This right here. The MSM is trying so hard to discredit Q, all one has to do is read the actual posts to know the MSM is lying.
The truth doesn’t care what they feel about it. It just is. But even if they do feel it’s stupid, they might learn something while they’re here. We need to show compassion for the lost sheep, even when they’re hateful.
I had seen things about QAnon but somehow I really missed it, probably because I hung out at Conservative TreeHouse on the FISA FOIA doc hunt and it was never talked about, at least explicitly. It was Savannah Guthrie going after Trump at the Town Hall that had my ears prick up, but I didn't know how to figure out what it was since by then they weren't allowed on FB, Reddit, or any sites I knew about. I was busy at work and didn't push to find out.
The Friday after the election I stumbled on an article on a Libertarian news site, written by a retired military intel officer, where he said he was convinced that Q was a real military intelligence operation. Since I was an officer, he instantly got my attention, and the Q Proofs video linked in that article clinched it for me.
I am so mad I missed all the fun for the 4 years as I love research and puzzles. But just these 4 months have been hard on me so it's probably a good thing I was oblivious all those years...
Yes it is a strawman. But to me it's a pattern of thinking I notice in SEVERAL areas. This sort of intellectual arrogance in America where people think they know things without knowing anything about it. We're all probably guilty of that from time to time, allowing our assumptions to poison the well of particular topics. I know I was guilty of it when I was younger. A lot of it comes from the propaganda of our country. I thought minimum wage was a "No Duh" policy. When I first heard the counterarguments against it, it blew my mind. It legit like hurt my feelings to accept that it was true. So I'm not saying I'm special, but some people never grow out of it.
I'm reading Adam Grant's Think Again book. He is an organizational psychologist and professor at Wharton. He has identified an "Armchair Quarterback Syndrome". My favorite line in the book so far: "If we're certain that we know something, we have no reason to look for gaps and flaws in our knowledge - let alone fill or correct them." Found in the section called "Stranded at the Summit of Mount Stupid." I am feeding parts of the book to the obstinate liberals on Facebook. Plus, I'm trying to learn how to reach these people that are so set in their ways. I know that I'm now never certain that I know something.
I love that quote, and definitely try to apply that to myself too. That line of thinking is what led me towards libertarianism, questioning everything. Which I think I got from George Carlin. Ha. But even now I don't even think I'm a libertarian anymore, this last year has made me question it. I'm not sure exactly where I fall anymore. I don't think every solution is about the government or type of government you have. I think the morality of the people and their values is even more important.
Beware the advanced strawman argument of the motte and bailey as well.
Firstly, you're in for a treat. The Q "project", or whatever you want to call it, is one of the most compelling literary events in world history.
It's a mixture of questions, news, puzzles, whistle-blowing, trolling, misinformation, hope, and humor. If it's true, it's the most important project of our lifetimes and will unite our country against a group of people committing crimes against humanity through our government.
Agreed that the absolute best place to investigate Q for yourself is the original Q posts. Visit Anon sites to help fill in your understanding and as always, never disengage your skepticism or critical thinking.
Feel free to post your analysis of Q posts in relation to current events, and thank you for taking the time to research Q for yourself.
That is a very profound statement. Either the "Q Project" is true or it is false.
If it is false, then a lot of people fell for something that was false. That is no great crime, considering how compelling and full of seemingly proven information was presented. Not a big deal, in the overall scheme of things.
But if it is true, then it is the single most important historical event in our lifetimes. Think of the millions of people who are completely unaware of this important event. Think of the millions more who are vaguely aware, but who actively refuse to look into it -- the most important historical even of THEIR life -- not because they are knowledgable and reject it, but because they are IGNORANT and someone ELSE told them to STAY IGNORANT about it.
Not necessarily. Q did some say some disinformation is necessary. So the info Q shared in the drops is a blend, and not everyone is willing to do the work to determine what is/isn’t true. Most would rather let someone else (MSM, HBO, WaPo, etc.) tell them what to think about it.
For those willing to do that work, they saw the things they could nail down as fact - think the Strozk/Page texts and their implications - that elements within our own government were actively conspiring against a sitting president. And Q showed us the texts/transcripts to support it. If Q helped provide nothing more than evidence of FISA abuses, that would still be a huge bombshell.
I’d say it isn’t a matter of people “falling for something,” just a failure to nail down what parts were fact and what parts were disinfo. The Q drops are what they are, with tons of verifiable revelations, but speculation by anons didn’t nail the ultimate purpose of it, or predict the endgame.
People want Q to be an oracle of sorts, tell them the future, but that’s incorrect. I think Q was more influential in getting people to ask the right questions themselves. Q pointed people to things like overlooked articles, inconvenient facts, govt documents, that inspired those questions (and the MSM wouldn’t touch).
The MSM likes to shit on Q for being like 80% true and 20% false while they themselves are like 5% true and 95% fake. They do offer neat and tidy storylines where Q is part of the information wilderness. Any normie hatred for Q I think comes from disliking narratives that aren’t neat and tidy and wrapped up in 30 mins or less.
The Q posts were questions that people didn't consider previously coupled with the declarative statements which are where the necessary disinfo was seeded imo. It was the research that followed that lead to the truth. Q would occasionally confirm that anons were on the mark, or suggest they keep digging or put more time into working something out. For the first timer or person that is going through the posts, they can be a little confusing as a lot of the posts are not based on a chronological order, hell they were confusing to everyone following them at the time they were coming out. People worked together, brought what they found and it was refined over time, sort of a forge of truth. If someone is new, I suggest the route of looking at what others have put together for a crash course. The updated book of Q, there are a couple of really good vids, especially the one by the British guy(I'll add his channel name later). Use them as a primer then jump in and start your own research.
The greatawakening operation has been happening in phases. My personal feeling is that this was in the planning phase since the early 70's. The actual initialization phase was probably started late 80's early 90's. I think Trump has known about this for a LONG time, I doubt he was recruited in the run up to the 2016 election. I think we're in the last phase now, our job is to prepare everyone we can for the upcoming reveal. This last phase might take a while frankly, there is only so much horror, revulsion, anger, rage that a person can take. This last phase is going to be done in parts as well, it's just the logical way to handle things.
Well said my fren.
Hey mods, can we get a sticky in this or other post like this were we welcome new frens or curious soon-to-be frens ?
Also, it the pattern holds, be on the lookout for shills spouting racist garbage.
Ive been browsing this site for months. If this was a "cult" it's the worst cult I've ever seen. Remember: they like to project. Alot. Painfully alot. Im surprised the progressive communists haven't gone full Jim Jones yet.
I wouldn't be shocked if they did just that once the veil is ripped away from the public's eyes.
and make sure you read over the actual Q posts. That doc seems better than most, but they were still conflating some things, muddying the waters, etc. No, the storm wasn't the fake storming of the capitol. And those memes of people hanging were NOT posted by Q. I thought that adding those memes in episode 1 was very disingenuous.
Oh and also, Q hasn't posted on 8chan in years. The segment talking about that had to be from 2019 or prior.
Any one have a replay available? I don't get HBO.
Hulubisboffering a 30 day free trial. You can add a 7 day free trial of HBO. Then you cn immediatwly cancel both plans amd have 7 days to watch HBo stuff, 30 to watch Hulu
via Rumble
THANQ!
So, I take it by this post, that the HBO documentsry was more of a sham hit piece than any actual honest reporting?
Did the show mention anything about GAW by any chance?
None
Good. We will be lucky to handle the ones who find us on their own.
Good. ?
Just as a show of hands... how many in here now are new to Q after the HBO presentation last night?
For newbies and the oldies like me that still don’t fully grasp the “codes” read this and study:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/
I love the Daily Beast reporter, blatantly lying.
Sticky plz
Q and the Anons are NOT a cult. "We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES."
That's just stupid.
Not really. You can leave a cult when you know you're in one. Otherwise it's your reality and you only go in deeper.