34
stop_the_tyranny 34 points ago +34 / -0

I know some may take offense to the notion of this theory being bunk, but I also think you've approached it in a mature manner. Good theories need to withstand basic scrutiny. I too have found the information on this lacking, but perhaps there's some legal thing I've missed as well?

If there's anyone on the pro side of this theory, I'd like to see a good break down of how exactly it's supposed to be true, with the legalese spelled out a little better for those of us who didn't work IN the jag office.

4
stop_the_tyranny 4 points ago +4 / -0

I want to tap your brain on certain topics. I want to dig down some rabbit holes and learn some new things and think you may have answers to certain things that have been bugging me.

What's the best way to accomplish that?

3
stop_the_tyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. There's a devilishness to this whole process isn't there? Tricking people to undermine themselves for their oppressors benefit. Can't get much more evil than that.

2
stop_the_tyranny 2 points ago +2 / -0

My curiosity about hiding comms is more in context of current times where information technology only simplifies hiding conversations. To my mind this suggests they're not coherent or the only show in town, as it were. Who's watching them?

Now that I read some of what you share, I randomly remembered a movie called The Golden Compass. The titular object communicated through vague symbols and could allegedly answer any question or something. If you're savvy on that movie, what are your thoughts about that element? The whole movie seem kinda odd to begin with. Are you a proponent of cultural comms like movies? I would have to imagine that movie is telling us something.

4
stop_the_tyranny 4 points ago +4 / -0

Excellent post. I did, in fact, miss that. Glad I'm not the only one seeing these things then.

I would be curious how many "layers" they actually employ this tactic, but it's hard to confirm such things with hard evidence. My main thought is why they need to hide comms in the first place. Seems an odd thing to do when you have unquestionable power. That's a thread I'd like pulled.

2
stop_the_tyranny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Money is the root of all evil.

Instead of looking to "protect their brand" (aka protect their wealth), they should be asking how to build on what made them wealth in the first place. That will generate the most wealth without selling your soul.

If there's one type of person I hate, it's people who sell out others once they "make it." Don't exploit good people to get ahead. Period.

1
stop_the_tyranny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like it was a status quo thing. They saw an outlier candidate and sought to "hedge" against his run. They just underestimated him and had to up the pressure a few notches later.

The fact they did this without second thought should scare everyone here. It likely means they were doing it pre-Trump. How many decades? Who can say at this point. They sure don't care to tell us.

13
stop_the_tyranny 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sounds like the guy got away with it. Why don't they raid his house for classified documents? Sounds like he was basically a Democrat spy at this point and committed acts of espionage against the FBI. The fact he hasn't been arrested tells us how much this really upset the FBI.

Remember, if you lie to the FBI, you go to jail. If you hijack the FBI for your own DNC election interference schemes and get caught lying, just a slap on the wrist!

6
stop_the_tyranny 6 points ago +6 / -0

Rumble is apparently doing pretty well these days. I suspect it will compete more with sites like YouTube pretty soon. Don't apologize for being ahead of the curve!

7
stop_the_tyranny 7 points ago +7 / -0

You are not wrong, but we are also wired for the negative. Allow me to share some equally valid points:

  • Trump is still a free man despite EVERYTHING they've thrown at him for over FIVE YEARS.
  • Media approval/faith is at an all-time low still (so who cares what they call us?)
  • We have been taking back countless positions across the country from school boards to Governorships. This is real power that we now wield in our favor.
  • The FBI's reputation is now in tatters and the IRS is already coming into the crosshairs as well. There's even talks of scattering them to other orgs.

I can't really pretty up the innocent people being tortured in DC though. That's just a shit show and I pray we find an agreeable resolution to that ASAP.

Point is: Your reality check is useful in keeping our heads on straight and not getting drunk with minor victories, but we really should keep in mind that we are winning more than losing in a lot of ways. The more authoritarian they become, the harder it is for these chuckleheads to keep control.

2
stop_the_tyranny 2 points ago +2 / -0

At first, I too failed to have faith in the mods here as well as the community. I saw this divisive tactic clearly and thought "How can you guys fall for this? It's clearly a distraction/division tactic to split us over this crap." I even pondered foolishly calling it out in a post.

Less than a day later I now see that I was wrong and while I know I'm not a mod or anything, I offer my sincerest apologies. You guys may entertain things I think are off sometimes, but it's moments like these that keep me around.

Y'all rock. Now let's get back to what we're best at!

2
stop_the_tyranny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly just thought they were lazy and were passing their lack of creative talent on the cheap as some "progressive chic." Can't draw or get people to pose for photos? Just use our crummy flash animations!

The dehumanizing element is a new one though. I guess it does have a modern, almost surrealist element to it. Interesting..

5
stop_the_tyranny 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just to clarify, my post was meant to emphasize the fact that any accountability in the form of court martials would likely require the same bureaucrats and leadership that are currently causing our problems in the first place. I was basically mocking the notion.

I know this will put me at odds with some here. I don't mean to be rude with it, but it is increasingly seeming like a weak possibility going forward. If there is anything substantial and persuasive though, I invite someone to share it with me. It would bring me great relief. It's hard to go through EVERYTHING that gets shared here for the years it's been around.

3
stop_the_tyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

I notice this animation and art "style" a lot these days. Any known source of it or is it just a prog trend/fad? It's very common in tech.

5
stop_the_tyranny 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wanted to comment exactly on this.

They are talking down to non-whites like they're low iq, fat children. This should clearly be insulting, but at this point, why am I not surprised by the lack of outrage?

NPCs man, sometimes they're hilarious, but mostly they're just irritating.

4
stop_the_tyranny 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nah, you're not alone. As someone savvy to the mindsets of bureaucrats through first-hand work experience, I can attest that they would do something exactly like that and think themselves clever.

They can lie and cover for each other all they want. The People are catching on and growing more everyday. Tick tock, little paper pushers. Nothing is forever.

3
stop_the_tyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

If that's their timeline, lines up with an agenda culminating in 2025-2030.

Also explains why in some places they want to put vaccines in food or water supplies. They're clearly behind on their quota and every lost day is another day of the control group proving them wrong.

It could also be a "next phase" kind of thing, but they REEEAALLY pushed the shots on everyone. I think that was supposed to get a much higher percentage for plausible deniability and it failed spectacularly. Wouldn't be surprised if numbers are inflated to generate peer pressure to take it. Not like they're above bogus statistics at this point, right?

3
stop_the_tyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Weird take: if this was supposed to be intentional and COVID was likely the cover story, why aren't more people blatantly dead and the "pandemic" is largely over in the minds of most?

Normally I would have assumed it was meant to kill over 1-2% or something and that would keep it from being a major redpill to most (and cull the herd more as immigrants flood in), but what if they failed to make it as deadly as intended? They couldn't scare us enough on an accelerated timeline and now it's starting to fade as more and more comes out. I haven't seen a lot of "WH in control" takes on this one.

This might actually be a big L on their scoreboard. The fact it's coming out in the open more suggests not that they were successful but that they've been outed even more.

1
stop_the_tyranny 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would think they'd have backups, but after Afghanistan, I guess their coffers are drying up? Still seems odd.

This is probably what the "economic support" for Ukraine from us was. Why do US politicians care if Ukraine's GDP goes down...unless they're on the take. Numbers they sent suggested a few billion a month. This war may actually be bankrupting the DS in a way. If so, way to go Ruskies.

1
stop_the_tyranny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even crooks gotta pay the bills. Theirs just include a category for blackmail and bribery.

1
stop_the_tyranny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, that would be a good reason to withhold the list.

The list probably has people lefties KNOW are on the list, people who MIGHT be on the list, and people they DON'T know are on the list. By hiding the list, it changes the game theory where they have to cast a wider net to protect their assets, but in doing so, such assets are tracked and considered for purposes of the conspiracy. This could be a checkmate move based solely upon that when they seize the assets of every major player in the world simultaneously.

The downside would be the triggering of serious economic downturn, but if the economy is already in a downturn...can't burn down a house twice, right? This actually fits really well with a lot of things here and would further my theory about Ukrainian laundering to bypass this issue to "clean" organizations until it all blows over for them.

1
stop_the_tyranny 1 point ago +1 / -0

On the point of Biden. While it's true there are weird videos suggesting he has someone posing on him, that only suggests that: the Biden we see is not the real Biden. It's hard to 100% be sure if Biden has been legitimately replaced or he is employing a body double himself for various reasons. It's also hard to believe that NOBODY in the whole administration has blown the whistle on such a nefarious body snatchers-esque development. Proof of this would definitely prove some "plan" is underway with that level of control by snatching a POTUS.

For example: how often do the left love to conflate our research with bizarre nonsense in an effort to discredit us before normies? It would be trivial for them to set up a body double in a fake WH studio, fan the flames on forums like these and then BAM we look like crazies when they prove it's been Biden the whole time, or a body double due to "threats of terrorism." Classic left-style psyop. Obama did similar with his birth certificate by holding off to make his critics look bad. Whether or not you believe what was shown is legitimate is another matter entirely.

This is hardly conclusive, but it's also not fully debunked either, so you see why it's so hard for me to be certain on many things like this, yes?

3
stop_the_tyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

If we're taking this from a Q perspective, my understanding is that there should be white hats undermining black hats in some fashion. As this happens, I would expect there would be more public thrashing and gnawing of teeth beyond what we saw post election 2016. We would clearly have a ways to go.

What I find curious is that both Afghanistan and Ukraine have one thing in common: billions in equipment magically disappearing. Coupled with recent reports of our military allegedly disarming to "help Ukraine" I can't help but notice a pattern.

So again, if we're going Q-style speculating, this would suggest the DS is arming itself to the teeth which is odd. They prefer exploiting government power, yet they are covertly acquiring weapons? Are they planning a non-governmental fighting force or something else? This itself warrants its own discussion.

To think of it another way: Russia invades Ukraine and we start gutting our military? Shortly after we abandoned roughly 80b in equiment in Afghanistan? Something is bizarre here. If the DS were worried about Russia, why aren't they arming the military which has purged conservatives? If mil is on our side, that just makes it more bizarre. Again, this whole angle is odd by itself. There must be extra context I'm failing to factor in here, but there seems to be clear plays and counter-plays afoot here. It's just deciphering them properly so it all "fits."

If military were the only way, who is left holding the guns? Not the West, but Russia and China sure are! Hell, even India is in the area so don't rule them out since they have domestic issues as well.

If I go off my intuition, there is a group working to disarm the West. It may sound odd, but with the way everything is playing out, Q may very well have close ties to Russia. This would also explain the Russophobia for years. While public lefties are stupid, their higher ups are actually pretty savvy (they just have to manage idiots, sadly). The country is also acting in ways that are congruent with Q-ism. They could be co-opting it, but it's impossible to be sure at this point.

Any thoughts in this direction?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›