I don’t look at it like that. I look at it like you’re at a party, the host is an asshole, and kicks you out. So you go start your own party. A bunch of your friends come with you. If as soon as you get invited back to the first party, you go running over, it seems kind of weak. Right now everything Trump writes on Truth gets duplicated over to Twitter and repeated on the news so it’s not like the message isn’t getting out. But I suspect Trump might start tweeting again if he wins the Presidency. Then it looks a little different, like buying the property the first house was sitting on.
Hitler was either in on it, or he took the bait like an idiot and destroyed his country. They keep trying to bait Putin like they did Hitler and so far Putin hasn’t fallen for it. It’s possible to admit certain red pills about WW2 without jumping to “the Nazis were actually the good guys!” Another false binary.
It’s so presumptuous. I stopped doubting him before Super Tuesday 2016. The weekend before that was when he first mentioned implementing the Muslim ban “until we figure out what the hell is going on”. Sounded great to me but I thought he’d put his foot in his mouth and gone too extreme for the public right before Super Tuesday, then his poll numbers went UP, not down.
I’ve since watched many other people go through the same experience. Trump says or does something. Trump supporter freaks out, this was a mistake, unforced error, blah blah. A few days or weeks go by, new information comes out (that Trump would have known at the time) and all of a sudden what Trump said or did now looks like the perfect move.
That’s not Trump’s style. “I was tricked! I was duped!” It’s not a good look for a President. It’s similar to how he doesn’t let them film him eating. Nothing wrong with eating food, but for your President? Somehow it weakens him. It’s also I think why Trump never mentioned any of the assassination attempts on him. Sure it would be a good ploy for sympathy, temporarily, but then it leaves the President looking weak and vulnerable. Victim mentality.
Trump ordered troop removals and the generals violated his orders, did the opposite, and didn’t tell him. Not sure what a President is able to do if he issues an order as Commander in Chief, and the system is so corrupt the hierarchy under him doesn’t follow the order. Eventually he flew into the war zone himself and demanded to speak to people on the ground about what was happening and why his orders were being ignored. This is how he defeated ISIS actually. Mattis refused to finish them off and claimed it was impossible and would take years and years. Trump flew in himself and met the men on the ground who explained ISIS could be defeated in a few days but the generals wouldn’t allow it.
There were several times when Trump ordered things to be declassified and then the entire bureaucratic hierarchy refused to do so. It’s like demanding the President stop all crime. He could sign certain Executive Orders, he could speak out publicly, he could fire and replace certain people, but if the entire police force refuses to police crime, is the President supposed to walk the streets in all 50 states at once stopping crime? And if so, how?
I don’t hate him but stopped listening to him when the intro of his show started pushing Covid hysteria, then pushed it for two years or more. Does his show still open with a montage of Covid hysteria or has he flipped over to Ukraine hysteria now? Does he say the election was rigged? Did he tell everyone to wear a mask on their face for years and years?
Around this time Trump also said he should have said he absolutely did NOT want a wall so the Democrats would have forced him to build a wall. It was a joke, sure, but perhaps there was some strategic truth in it as well. One nice thing about Trump following the mainstream narrative on this is that anyone who rejected the injection couldn’t then be smeared/fired as a Trump supporter. It took Trump out of the equation.
I suspect that humans are being harvested by the cabal that aren’t part of the official record. No birth certificate, etc. That’s the “nice” explanation. There is one that is even darker but I don’t want to write it down because it would be so upsetting to people if it’s true.
Also with this rumor, I think they wouldn’t be putting THAT much human meat in each product, but only enough to make everyone cannibals on a technicality. If one body was blended to a liquid, it could be stretched pretty far if only some of it was being added to each vat during the production process.
And I don’t think keeping something like this classified wouldn’t only be about protecting the population from something they can’t handle. I would see it more as a way to HURT the cabal. If you expose it after arresting and executing the cabal, it would be like letting the cabal laugh and point at the world and get a final win after they’ve been destroyed. But to share it would be to let the cabal have a win even in defeat.
So OK, here’s an example. There is a rumor that the cabal has been mixing human meat into the food supply for decades as a way to unknowingly make us all cannibals like them. It’s like a joke to them. The rumor I heard is that any product that says “Natural Flavors” on it is code for human meat. Now look at how many products say “Natural Flavors” on it. Basically, outside of maybe the Amish, that would mean we’ve probably all eaten pounds and pounds of human flesh. We each might have eaten a thousand or more people each. It’s disgusting to even think about.
If you were President and you knew this for sure, would you go on TV and tell everyone? And if so, do you think people would thank you for it or hate you for it? I think they would hate you. Because they can’t undo what they’ve eaten. So now what? They have to live knowing they’ve been made cannibals against their will. The cabal gets the biggest laugh and everyone else gets to be disgusted. Is this really the best move? Or would it be better to have the military covertly destroy all these food factories, have the people who did this arrested and executed in military tribunals, and let the people live in ignorance of their unwitting cannibalism.
And forged a study in the Lancet to get it banned. And pulled it off shelves. And tried to take away medical licenses of doctors who prescribed it. And canceled prescriptions of people who were already taking it.
This should show people that Trump simply stating the truth about ANYTHING does not mean an automatic win. In some ways it might even make the situation worse.
Trump knows way more than he lets on but obviously can’t reveal things that are classified, or anything that will be declassified at a certain date. With that stuff, he basically has to play along with the official narratives. It’s like Q said, if they came out and told the people the full truth about everything, nobody would believe them. It would sound so improbable, people would reject it. All credibility would be lost within the Information War.
What if Epstein wasn’t even murdered but was extracted and put into hiding? Then Tucker’s question about whether or not he did or didn’t kill himself is a binary where both positions are wrong. And imagine Trump is sitting there knowing the truth and also knowing that the public is only able to wrap their minds around two positions, both wrong. Does he introduce the third position that basically NOBODY believes and look crazy, does he repeat Tucker’s position which is also wrong and makes him look crazy-ish, or does he repeat the default position which is wrong but makes it difficult for them to attack him on it?
There is reverse psychology too. If the cabal thinks they will be able to get people to take more injections with this new narrative, if President Trump swoops in and not only agrees, but demands credit too, it forces the corporate media to step back from this narrative, and less people get injected. I would say watch from here: does the corporate media keep pushing this narrative, and more people get injected, or do they back off, and less people get injected?
Even red-pilled people freak out if they get a red pill they aren’t ready for or open to. Remember how many people on our side were furious that the Covid injection was being questioned early on, because they didn’t want to be associated with “anti-vaxxers”. They responded exactly like leftists responding to the wall. Many such examples like this. Back in 2015 many red-pilled conservatives would get furious if you questioned climate change, because it was anti-science and made them feel like their movement was full of uneducated people.
Q said that only 40% of the truth could be revealed. That makes me think whatever the other 60% is, for the people who were told it, they are all unanimous that they regret being told and would prefer to have not been told. That it keeps them up at night and, on some level, has ruined the world for them.
Trump talks about central casting and Schiff is like central casting for odious corrupt politician. If you wanted to rally Americans against corruption, it’s much easier to rally them against someone as overtly unlikeable as Schiff than someone more handsome and charming. It’s like how Brian Stelter and Jon Stewart are pushing the same agenda, but Stelter is a turn off and Stewart will suck people in.
Q stated that basically the corruption was so bad, and had gone on so long, that to try to expose and prosecute it all would basically destroy the country. People rankle at this, and it makes sense, but I think the idea was that, for example, EVERY single person in jail would be able to appeal their prosecution. EVERY politician in the past however many decades was illegitimate, meaning all laws going back decades would be null and void. Potentially almost EVERY actor and musician going back decades was forced at gunpoint to do something terrible to a child on camera, which would wipe a century of American culture away. Potentially EVERY sporting event has been rigged for decades too. Then there even other darker subjects that we aren’t supposed to talk about on the win network because it’s so upsetting to people, as well as rumors about the medical establishment, vaccines, the food supply, etc. Q talked about a world stalemate: every country has the dirt on every other country and it prevents any of them from overturning the whole system.
I know many people say destroy it all anyway but man, if you are Trump sitting in the war room hearing all of this, part of you has to be wondering, If I destroy it all, what would even be left? You’d almost be paving the path for the NWO and One World Government by first wiping out all of American history and culture.
There was a whole code to it that was being floated around. It was never confirmed but it has seemed strange. The overall idea was that all these celebrities who had done something terrible on camera (rape and/or murder of children) in exchange for fame and fortune had been rolled up and were now being flipped one by one on the masterminds behind the whole blackmail power structure. And in exchange for flipping, the celebrity would be executed but their legacy would be preserved. The celebrities who refused to flip would also be executed, but first their reputations would be ruined. So if this is true, it would mean many of these recent celebrity deaths were flippers, whereas maybe an Alec Baldwin refused, so now his name and legacy are being destroyed. This is all speculation.
It seems to me that if China and Russia, at a minimum, are sucking up every text and email people write around the world, and recording every phone call, and snapping an infra-red picture on everyone’s phone every thirty seconds, then America is pretty much forced to do the same. It would be a bad move strategically to allow China and Russia access to view and store all of that information while we sit around twiddling our thumbs because of privacy issues.
I’m not saying it’s a good thing. It’s twisted. But how do you allow your enemy such an advantage in an Information war?
I believe this is why they maintain the spying (both parties) while dancing around it. They don’t want to come out and tell the truth: yes we are spying on you, and yes, we have to, because so is China, so instead it’s either “we’re not doing it” or “we gotta stop this (but not really)”.
There was a theory that the military might have done that. Also some number crunching theories that the amount of “Covid vaccines” they claim to have produced worldwide couldn’t have actually been manufactured in the time given, so saline would have been necessary either way. I do think the people who were injected and had no side effects probably received saline.
Trump dropped another 17 reference in his speech in New Hampshire the other night. Talked about the guys behind the computer shooting down missiles. Said they were as cool as cucumbers and it takes them “about 17 seconds” to shoot them down. Then said they were geniuses.
I’ve noticed the likes on liberal posts by friends on Facebook have dropped enormously.