Didn’t the Founding Fathers drew heavily upon English legal concepts and traditions in shaping the American legal system. They were familiar with the common law tradition, including works by English jurists like William Blackstone, and drew inspiration from documents like Magna Carta. If it works for others then why not?
Yep. Other countries have had national ids for its citizens for decades without anything nefarious happening. A standardised way of identifying legal residents and streamlining other transactions. I mean you’re pretty much there already with your passports, drivers licenses, student id, green card and whatnot. Advances in the technology would help minimise fraud. IDs wouldn’t be needed in an ideal society where immigration laws are respected, but here we are.
And, to my Christian frens, don’t worry about NWO or Mark of the Beast in this context. They’re Strawmens. Long long story short, the Mark is nothing physical/material. Never was. It is spiritual - from within not outward in appearances.
Nah. Missing the big picture here. Trump has always advocated America-first time and time again. Every one of his policies thus far reflects that. So he’s not just gonna turn around and decide to become a lesser or equal partner in “the commonwealth” - especially to a country that got its a$$ handed to it a couple of centuries ago. America is a hegemon. Any Trump’s “musing” should be taken with a grain of salt by now as trolls/triggers value for keeping the Left preoccupied. C’mon folks.
Having said that. Any ‘special relationship’ borne out of both World Wars, especially, was not out of love or kindred spirit for the Brits (see 1776) but at the behest of powerful Zionist interest on both sides of the Atlantic. See https://britainpalestineproject.org/against-our-better-judgment-the-hidden-history-of-how-the-us-was-used-to-create-israel/
Then who do you suggest we follow that’s not “controlled opposition”,”cracked”, “compromised”, “black-pilled”, “grifting”, “xtard”,….. ?
Hmmm? 🫤
Sowing seeds of distrust and confusion.
Discernment frens. Each to their own.
Yes. Maybe she, and others, may not all be spot on but at least she’s putting it out for for the normies to think about. Need to cut them some slack. Hat tip to them for putting their necks out there instead of anonymously typing away on the keyboards. 👍 🎩
Thank you for sharing your fascinating experience, fren. Like many African sad stories - over a century of colonialism, exploitation, infightings and corruption. Wealth of minerals and land mass but they cannot get it together.
According to Title 10, United States Code, Section 624. This statute allows the president to appoint individuals to certain military ranks, such as during wartime or under other specific circumstances, without the need for Senate confirmation.
Additionally, under the Constitution (Article II, Section 2), the president has the authority as commander-in-chief of the armed forces to make certain military appointments, subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, except in specific cases like those mentioned in 10 U.S.C. § 624.
Uncle Sam’s face is more accurate.