What are you talking about
It was 15 days. Google who touted that scenario.
It was a ridiculous story. Rolling Stone exercised egregiously poor editorial standards (as they did with the UVA story), citing one doctor to make a story and using a photo of people in a line where clearly no one is shot when they could have used an IV drip stock image or something else generic. The idea of publishing this yellow journalism in the age of the internet is embarrassing. It's a good thing everyone here cites sources with the highest editorial standards, e.g. The Gateway Pundit.
FWIW, the doctor has had testing sites shut down before.
Pence did what he did so Trump could be Shadow President and not be constrained by the Constitution or the limits of reality itself
Does it matter that they see you how you see them? There's a lot of subjectivity involved here. Chances are they won't die from the vaccine and you won't die from COVID. Learn about confirmation bias and outrage factors.
My heart breaks for these abused dogs. And get this: our military leaders have directed the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of PEOPLE for decades just to control resources American companies have no right to. And it cost us billions.
aren't a lot of them Antifa/cabal plants? I don't understand
Where is the data showing you're more likely to be hospitalized and die with a "breakthrough infection"? What are they hiding?
Why are there no face matches except the first guy, and they don't show his name on the choir names list?
This guy must have been a liberal because he wanted voter suppression: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw
Then that means Apartheid South Africa probably invented it, and as a conservative back then I was against them as was Thatcher and Reagan
Yes they are a thing of the past for people worried about getting infected. I believe in survival of the fittest and I hope everyone who cared about not infecting others finally desists
It looks like my comment was already blocked. Interesting
I NEVER agreed with the lockdown, I just think that its irresponsible to misstate the purpose of masks. COVID would have disproportionately eliminated older voters which is good in my book. I freely admit to being a bad person and recognize my potential to hurt others.
Supposedly, and they've said this all along, the mask is to prevent other people from getting the virus FROM you, not to keep you from getting the virus. It's fine not to believe that, but it certainly is predictable which side of the political aisle has a hard time processing the idea of acting on behalf of society.
What he said was retail masks don't keep you from getting the virus, they are to prevent you from transmitting it to others. Some people really have a hard time wrapping their head around this concept since it involves other people.
The rest is interesting though.
Why are they asking courts to keep the count procedures secret ? Reminds me of the original count, except this time I think it could benefit my side.
The real "conspiracy" in my opinion is actually pretty simple: the world is composed of self-interested actors, some with more power and money than anyone should have. Problems just naturally manifest from the self interest of the elites because they're not our interests.
Use promo code ALARMCLOCK to wake up great savings on a brand new MyPillow
The importance of new information and prophesy, true or false, and all collective action on behalf of the pertaining nation, is as a cudgel against reality as it "exists."
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Can it be cleansed by the non-mRNA vaccine?
declass EVERYTHING incl all presidential records