Pompeo posts a perfectly centered Q.
(i.ibb.co)
Comments (65)
sorted by:
How many coincidences until it's mathematically impossible?
Like...three.
I'm kinda losing faith in these "obscure messages"... I'll believe on popcorn day or the day after but right now my hopium is entirely depleted.
Meh some of these are stretches, but just because we sometimes jump at shadows doesn't mean messages aren't there.
Did you miss this? It's stickied on the front page. Massive hopium infusion.
https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0X53oYM/ladies-and-gentlemen-our-fearles/c/
Is it really a Q or you just want it to be? For me the last one does not fit..
I saw it.
In my opinion it's just as obscure... If pompeo tweets "My fellow Americans, the storm is upon us......" or something similar... that'd be hard enough of a proof for me.
I just kinda thought something "biblical" would've happened at this point... then again it's not popcorn day.
It wouldn't be Biblical if it happened by now. We're watching a movie. Movies have a grand finale, not a grand middle. Also, isn't it interesting that Q tells us it's a movie and the 19th happens to be popcorn day?
I admit it wasn't as clear as this one, but it was a breath of fresh air.
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1337270838878490628
I totally get it... I remember when I finally believed was a video that Trump posted to communist Twitter that had all these letter appear and disappear and for a brief second, the very last letter was a Q and it was directly in the middle of the screen. I watched it multiple times and slowed it down and grabbed it. Why a Q? Why in the middle? I know why!!!!
We're in the ten days of darkness. These "obscure messages" are for you, the doubters. I'm entirely sure this is happening even with no further comms.
Disagree entirely. This probably isn't comms at all; at least not in the way it's being presented as (Don't miss the forest for the trees, after all - there may be a lot more significance more explicitly in the tweet, but everyone's busy cutting up an image that almost looks like it has a Q in it if you squint hard enough).
What's more, ten days of darkness is a repeatedly debunked myth. Nowhere does Q say "Ten days of darkness". It is really "[sic] Ten days. [new line] Darnkess. [new line] War. [sic]" (Misspelling intentional; and misspellings matter, remember?)
Real comms are like the picture that was posted on the 5th by one of Trump's kids (can't remember which) with a Q on it plain for all to see. Even stuff like the misspelling a bit ago that lead to "I and A" is far more sound than this.
the post with 7/10 that we just had a delta anniversary for lines up perfectly with Trump's Twitter going dark. Just because there was a period doesn't mean it won't happen. Try to keep your mind open.
There is no reason to believe it implies 10 days of darkness.
To be clear, I do believe in the plan.
How do you explain the misspelling even, it didn't even say "Darkness", it said "Darnkess"
How do you know it isn't Darnkess War, by that same removal-of-period logic?
How do you know it isn't 10 days of darnkess, war, and good v. evil? If so, there is no apparent weapons hot war in progress to anyone's knowledge right now.
My mind is open; I don't latch onto singular (relatively baseless) explanations or interpretations of the posts. I recognize there is more to see, and that most interpretations likely miss the mark, maybe even by a lot.
There are things in the posts which are absolute, there are others that are not. The whole "10 days of darkness" thing is completely NOT absolute.
You're just being disingenuous and wordy. You come at me with: "10 days of darkness is debunked." Thats an absolute.
Then you finish with "10 days of darkness is not absolute." Make up your mind.
You're a sophist. Lots of fancy talk, little substance. No need to reply, I won't read it.
the thing is, what are the chances of so many 'messages, appearing so consistently?
how many would it take to convince you, or are you a kipper-slap-around-the-face kind of proof person?
We don't know the chances because we don't have a sample/control to compare to. If we spent as much time digging through random non coded messages and found way less connections, maybe we'd be on to something.
Honestly, the entire Q movement is based around finding hidden messages. Why are you here and not TDW? Not being an ass, but this forum is literally for Q.
If you’re dooming or your hopium meter is empty, don’t put it out there for everyone else. People here are looking for Hope and answers, and I feel that should be the only contributions made.
Disagree 100%. Q is about the Q posts; explicitly containing more cryptic and encoded messages.
If the entirety of Q were as substance-less as these messages, we'd have 1/100th the people.
It's stuff like official people posting the imagery with Q explicitly written out in it in big bold, or generals confirming it is real, or the prediction of no name's death down to the minute an exact month before hand that locks people in on Q.
Image height: 854
8 + 5 + 4 = 17, hint?
The vertical center is at: 427
https://qanon.pub/#427
Why is the ‘i' missing? Q
And the ‘I' is missing in the Pompeo's tweet: https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status/1349721009830719490
First I went...
I toured the..
First; 854 sounds like a pretty standard image height.
Second; tons of people tweet shorter/leaving out the full of the sentence. That isn't unique; would be different of one of the words were missing the letter I.
Third; these number games are just that - games. I can do it too, watch:
First - the image is 1240 x 775. That can be unscrambled to read 17, 45, 70, 2
1240 + 775 = 2015 - the year Trump really started running seriously, also, Q post 2015 - [Quote of other post saying: "CORONA 4 NOW OFFLINE Q"] "CORONA 8 RE_ROUTE T_83 CORONA 8 NEW CONTROL. CORONA 8 NOW OFFLINE Q"
That Q post was from 2018, and the image was also from 2018 ("Hippo day 2018") - They must be linked!
What's more - the eye of the hippo has a brighter skin tone around it. That makes the shape of a Q! [person] just tweeted a Q!!!
I could continue. It is not hard to find things when you look hard enough for them. Your numbers game is a reach and I think you know it.
That isn't to say all of Q is a reach - There are MANY other MUCH more solid proofs. This just isn't one of them; this is a giant reach.
Finally, this image wasn't just created for Pompeo to post here. This is a historical image. Are you about to tell me that they took time during the war to pose a (?) sherman (?) in the light in just the right way so that the machine gun barrel casts a shadow that aligns with the rim of the gun panel that is almost a circle in just the right way so that it almost looks like a Q, just so people ~50 years later could get a post from Mike Pompeo confirming Q?
Of all times ICE is taking a smoke break it has to be now...
Post 393
https://qposts.online/?q=393&s=postnum
.... AND it breaks the 30 Minute timing .... not that I claim to know what/if that means, but it might to some?
Explicit Q: https://i.ibb.co/YR4L400/6uu989gass.jpg
Link: https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status/1349721009830719490
A bit of a stretch
It's an Israeli tank.
I don't see the Q.
The gun with the barrel shadow
You need some rest, man, seriously. The photographer was probably aiming at the soldier's head, that's all.
The image itself was probably an accident, by why did Pompeo choose that particular image for his post?
When I saw it I knew there was going to be something, it's a very obscure photo - the kind that takes a while to search out.
Again, not something you find on shutterstock (although I haven't checked)
Now THAT I believe. The Q is just pareidolia, is people seing what they want to see.
Please give me a link to an old war photo with a perfectly centered subliminal Q. You have 10 minutes.
Have you ever heard of the concept of pareidolia?
Yes, I understand that concept. Do you understand the concept of subliminal Q perfectly centered and posted by Pompeo? It is surely another coincidence.
who told you the original photograph was centered like this?
Do you have the original one to prove me wrong?
my intent is not to "prove you wrong" dude — just saying that nothing tells us the original photo was cropped the exact same way
You should try harder man, because you are partially right. The original photo was not centered on the gun as you can see here: https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/israels-egyptian-super-spy/
I still think AP Images cropped it and not Pompeo did it because of the placing of the credits text on the bottom left.
I dont get it.... where is the Q in this image?
can you point out where the missing 'i' would be?
ignore that, it should be the first 'word'
The 'I' is missing two times.
First I went...
I toured the...
oho, check out his personal tweet that came out just afterwards
I think the missing I's are important because it's pointing you to his personal account..
https://mobile.twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1349729866086682627
Same sentence structure, but this time the I's are there.. "I may not be able to fit in my battle dress uniform anymore, but leading @CIA & @StateDept , I constantly focused on protecting our great military and all Americans."
And this time there is a warning..
"If nothing else, our enemies knew: attack our soldiers & you will pay."
Has he just told the CIA and State Dept. not to attack them?
MIND = BLOWN
come on dude
what the fuuuuckkkkkkkk
doesnt look like a Q to me
Perfectly
Tremendously awesome!
?
Inside the circle is a gun barrel. Look at the shadow of the barrel. See it now? Pompeo is solid.
Oh I know he’s solid. He was my rep when we lived in Kansas.
"Trust Kansas." I love the guy!
Gosh damn! I completely missed that one! Great catch!
https://qposts.online/?q=393&s=postnum