I seen it in their faces to. That was not a happy celebration at all. It was boring and sad and fearful. I bet they would of all had a heart attack if the fireworks happened during the speech. Thank you for the breakdown.

This isn't even a "fringe" hopium post.

It's just the law and what is coming.

I guess take it or leave it , but nothing will stop what's coming. Believe or be ambushed.

YES!!! It’s actually becoming clearer as each hour passes.

Please excuse my language but MOTHERFUCKERS FUCK YES I CAN'T WAIT! But I will. Because it will be BIBLICAL. When humans realize these truths and the frequencies align the human and spiritual the great awakening will change the universe. I'm new to all this so if that seems strange to say I promise I'm not being sarcastic, and I'm not sure if that's what the "great awakening" means but to me it does. Hope I'm right.

THIS IS SO FREAKING AWESOME! I'VE ONLY BEEN HERE A FEW DAYS AND I LOVE YOU WISE HUMANS!!!!

can you give a quick explanation of 11.3 End of Occupation and Duration of GC Obligations...

Thank you for compiling this!

Anyone got a link to this prayer when eyes were darting around?

I saw the eyes of the people are that ceremony today, and they were darting around like they thought the hammer was about to drop right there during the prayer. Go back and watch if you missed that part.

I worked from home yesterday too and had the entire thing on with CSPAN. What a fucking disaster for our country to have this child sniffer pedo and his crackhead son in the WH. But: Can confirm. The eyes are the window to the soul. Everyone there was eyes darting around not seemingly happy at all. Very curious.

They all looked paranoid as fuck, STILL I have this odd feeling that it isn't over, we're literally under a illegitimate government, whatever Biden tries to do will be null and void. Remember the Military is the ONLY way and HAS IT ALL. I personally don't think this shit is over, George Washington lost more battles than he won but he eventually won the big one.

Is it true that Trump still has the nuclear codes? I'm hearing conflicting things. I'm not as disappointed in Biden being inaugurated as I am in so called "patriots" instantly giving up. You NEVER give up, I was raised to keep going.

Can someone please explain 11.3 like I'm 5?

Crown Corporation is the occupying power of D.C. or what?

ELI5 please :)

Edit: Found this as the most related to this 11.3

4524

Jun 25, 2020 10:21:59 PM EDT

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2e1312 No. 9749096

https://twitter.com/Tdawg0925/status/1276334965492416513

Good catch.

Coincidence?

Important people understand for future events.

Assumption or intel based?

All assets [F][D] deployed.

[D] + China = 11.3

Q

It looked like Nancy had one of her "security" order her to a spot. She looked confused and obeyed. I didn't see people convinced theybwerenin power. Is the military forcing this act???

For reference, the post he is reading in the podcast is located here: https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJjlBUT0/at-first-i-was-disappointed-in-t/

DISCLAIMER: Yes, I am the original author of this and No, I am not Dave from X22 Report.

The only confirmation I need, other than nearly a hundred irrefutable proofs, was DJTs last words. "We'll be back, very soon." Trust POTUS.

Everyone is focused on military. Listen, they had and have role to play. But your jumping a step, how does the military get involved?? Durham, his special council is still alive and active and cannot be touched or stopped by biden

As Important as this marker is, I'm still praying for US.

We should never go asleep again and have to rely on our military to bail US out. I thank God Almighty that our military had not been completely corrupted, but that there are still PATRIOTS in it that understand the foundation of our Constitution and where true power is and belongs.

We must read and understand our own responsibilities and pledge to meet them.

Read the 1776 Report. It is an important accompaniment to the rest of this stuff going on.

The threats of infiltration are still very real. For example, I found this yesterday.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/foreign-language-training-companies-admit-participating-conspiracy-defraud-united-states

Foreign-Language Training Companies Admit to Participating in Conspiracy to Defraud the United States

And this.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-army-soldier-arrested-attempting-assist-isis-conduct-deadly-ambush-us-troops

U.S. Army Soldier Arrested for Attempting to Assist ISIS to Conduct Deadly Ambush on U.S. Troops

Vigilance a still needed by US.

For me, it includes prayer vigilance.

#PrayerWarriors

11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS

The status of belligerent occupation ends when the conditions for its application are no longer met. Certain GC obligations with respect to occupied territory continue for the duration of the occupation after the general close of military operations.

11.3.1 End of Occupation. Belligerent occupation ceases when the conditions for its application are no longer met.81 In particular, as discussed below, the status of belligerent occupation ceases when the invader no longer factually governs the occupied territory or when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the State of the occupied territory and the Occupying Power. 82

Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed the occupied territory under its control. 83 For example, an uprising by the local population may prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory. Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control sufficiently the occupied territory.

Belligerent occupation also may end when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the Occupying Power and the State of the occupied territory (although, as discussed in the following subsection, certain GC obligations may continue to apply). 84 For example, if a new, independent government of the previously occupied territory assumes control of the territory and consents to the presence of the previously occupying forces, then such a situation would no longer be considered a belligerent occupation. Similarly, if a peace treaty legitimately transfers the territory to the sovereignty of the Occupying Power, then the Occupying Power would no longer be characterized as such. However, an Occupying Power is not permitted, under the law of belligerent occupation, to annex occupied territory.85

11.3.2 Duration of GC Obligations in the Case of Occupied Territory. In the home territory of parties to the conflict, the application of the GC shall cease on the general close of military operations. 86

In the case of occupied territory, the application of the GC shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such State exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the GC:

• 1 through 12 (general provisions and common articles, e.g., the Protecting Power continues to function, and the derogation for security reasons continues to apply); • 27, 29 through 34 (humane treatment); • 47 (preserves rights as against change by annexation or arrangement with the local authorities so long as occupation lasts); • 49 (transfers, evacuation, and deportation); • 51, 52 (prohibitions against certain compulsory service and protection of workers); • 53 (respect for property); • 59, 61 through 63 (facilitating relief programs); • 64 through 77 (criminal proceedings); and • 143 (access by Protecting Powers and the ICRC). 87

The one-year time limit for the cessation of the application of the GC (apart from the provisions that continue to apply to the extent that the Occupying Power exercises the functions of government in occupied territory) was proposed to account for situations like those of Germany and Japan after World War II. 88 AP I provides that the 1949 Geneva Conventions and AP I shall cease to apply, in the case of occupied territories, on the termination of the occupation;89 coalition partners that are Occupying Powers and Parties to AP I would be bound by this rule.

In any case, individuals entitled to GC protection who remain in the custody of the Occupying Power following the end of occupation retain that protection until their release, repatriation, or re-establishment. 90 In addition, it may be appropriate following the end of occupation to continue to apply by analogy certain rules from the law of belligerent occupation, even if such rules do not apply as a matter of law. 91

11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER

Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory.92 The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory to the Occupying Power.

11.4.1 Right of the Occupying Power to Govern the Enemy Territory Temporarily. The right to govern the territory of the enemy during its military occupation is one of the incidents of war.93 By the fact of occupation (i.e., the Occupying Power’s established power over occupied territory), the Occupying Power is conferred the authority to exercise some of the rights of sovereignty.94 The exercise of these sovereign rights also results from the necessity of maintaining law and order, indispensable both to the inhabitants and to the occupying force, and the failure or inability of the legitimate government to exercise its functions, or the undesirability of allowing it to do so.95

11.4.2 Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory. Belligerent occupation in a foreign war, being based upon the possession of enemy territory, necessarily implies that the sovereignty of the occupied territory is not vested in the Occupying Power. 96 Occupation is essentially provisional.

Because sovereignty is not vested in the Occupying Power, the fact of military occupation does not authorize the Occupying Power to take certain actions. For example, the Occupying Power is not authorized by the fact of belligerent occupation to annex occupied territory or to create a new State.98 In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it.99 Similarly, in view of the provisional nature of belligerent occupation, the authority of the Occupying Power under occupation law has been interpreted as being subject to limitations on the ability of the Occupying Power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.100

11.5 DUTY OF THE OCCUPYING POWER TO ENSURE PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY

The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the Occupying Power, the latter shall take all the measures in its power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country. 101 This principle has been recognized as customary international law.102

The Occupying Power has a general duty to maintain public order and to provide for the preservation of rights of the inhabitants, including rights to their private property.10

11.5.1 Authority Conferred by the Occupying Power’s Duty to Ensure Public Order and Safety. The Occupying Power’s duty to take all the measures in its power to restore and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety also provides it authority take such actions. For example, the Occupying Power may enact provisions to maintain the orderly government of the territory.10

11.5.2 Duty to Respect, Unless Absolutely Prevented, the Laws in Force in the Country. The duty to respect, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country prohibits the Occupying Power from arbitrarily exercising its authority to suspend, repeal, or change the municipal law applicable to occupied territory. 105

The duty to respect, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country has been interpreted not to apply to local administrative laws, such as regulations, executive orders, ordinances, and decrees.106

I may have found a critical reference to sentencing and punishment on that blue twitter reference on post from "lash"(can someone please explain 11.3 like I'm5.......)on thread "The process of restoring the Republic.Not a cheerleading thread......." Open that twitter and scroll down to gold volume knob ..Max volume 11.11 then refer to Law of War manual section 11.11.

I thought Harris was gunna throw up

Can someone post the video of the troops turning yheir backs?

While I agree they're probably screwed, damn you Q for not starting your drops 30 days later... The suspense is killing me lol.

But imagine how the DS actors feel.

Now we just need the watches to be accurate! I'm not convinced the first one on the 19th was the declass of the FISA gate stuff... I guess I need some kind of evidence of the timing of the release lining up with the timing on the watch.

Woah woah woah, just blew my mind. Am I understanding this correctly?

The DC NG reports to the president. Trump used the NG to legally occupy DC in the name of inauguration security. Cool.

Well when Biden was illegitimately inaugurated, he took over control of the NG, and thus the occupation of DC, and then immediately exercised authority publically. AKA a "Belligerent Occupation".

So check this out:

11.2.2.2 “Under the Authority” – Suspension and Substitution of Governmental Authority. Occupation also requires the suspension of the territorial State’s authority and the substitution of the Occupying Power’s authority for the territorial State’s authority. The territorial State must be rendered incapable of publicly exercising its authority in the territory, and the Occupying Power must substitute its authority for that of the territorial State. Invading forces in possession of the territory must have taken measures to establish their authority.64 For example, such measures may include establishing its own governmental authority for that area and making regulations for the conduct of temporary government. The suspension and substitution of authority may take place with local authorities continuing to administer territory subject to the paramount authority of the Occupying Power.

Biden taking control and publicly exercising authority is necessary to be a Belligerent Occupier. We are now set for 11.3

11.3.1 End of Occupation. Belligerent occupation ceases when the conditions for its application are no longer met. In particular, as discussed below, the status of belligerent occupation ceases when the invader no longer factually governs the occupied territory or when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the State of the occupied territory and the Occupying Power... Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed the occupied territory under its control. For example, an uprising by the local population may prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory. Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control sufficiently the occupied territory.

It is all about this....

Thanks SantaSurfing

I see people that look like they have already been condemned

A religion requires numerous dichotomic relationships. It needs believers and unbelievers. It needs those who know the mysteries and those who only fear them. It needs the insider and the outsider. It needs both a god and a devil.It needs absolutes and relativity. It needs that which is formless and that which is formed.

So where are the goalposts now?