non-issue. Shoe change: she has her more comfortable "walking" heels (esp. on the asphalt) and then her "fancy" green (or blue whatever) heels for the event. Shoe changes for a woman is not that big of a deal, esp. with an event. Some shoes do not do well on the asphalt and you don't want to ruin them. Later on when they are walking down the street, she's back in the walking tan colored heels after changing them from the green "event" fancy heels.
I have too agree, anyone that's been Married for a time knows most women have a faddish for shoes and other accessories. Not trying to discredit the Idea of this is a Movie.... or the possibility of it being staged...
I’m convinced... that anyone who believes the shoe change is significant has never had a serious relationship with an adult female. This theory alone is easier to believe than the idea that some shoe change by Jill has pulled the curtain back on a “fake inauguration”.
I believe that Biden is a corrupt, criminal, career politician, and the uniparty machine, backed by the CCP, has installed him in the Oval Office. But I don’t think his wife’s wardrobe is part of the problem.
I also believe the change in shoes in a big "meh". I have walking to something shoes and then nicer shoes for the event. And I'm not that big into fashion, but I know what shoes I can walk well in and those that just look good.
was sort of thinking this not to be a naysayer but plenty of times women change shoes bc of comfort levels and other logistical things like you said walking on asphalt
Yeah I pretty much bring 2 pairs of shoes to any long event, like a wedding or whatever. Heels can get uncomfortable really fast and changing them out to a heel that hugs your foot differently is essential.
One regret about my wedding day is my insistence on wearing one pair of shoes the whole night (I turned my nose up to the flip-flop trend). By the end of the night I was barefoot anyway, my feet hurt so bad. Really wish I had big, blinged-out comfy flip flops for the reception!
LOL! One of my cousins who was never a fashionista about shoes, wore white hightop converse sneakers decorated with sequins and crystal. Wore them for ceremony as well as reception.
When Gaga starts to sing the official video switches to a shot that shows a bright, partly cloudy sky behind the capitol building. In the amateur's video we get glimpses of total cloud cover behind the building.
I swear I was up at 4am watching a guy live stream outside the inauguration. I was tired and he seemed like he was gonna sleep but the weather seemed pretty gloomy and completely overcast. I’m not an expert on DC weather but to say that cleared out by then seemed odd. But what gets me is the lighting for the event is... really dramatic? Something just seemed so weird
I think you guys should stop brushing it off as girls love shoes and look at the pictures.
By your logic there should be reason to the shoe changes....
She's wearing both sets both inside and outside. Both sets walking casually down a wall.
Also look at the shoes. There's no difference except the color. Those shoes r not one for looks and one for comfort. Same heel height, same front pinch.
Yeah my wife said that’s not a big deal change of shoes could happen for many reasons. Perhaps she wanted a more comfortable pair to get up the steps.
Biggest PROOF it’s was prerecorded is Biden didn’t fuck up a single line what more do you need.
Here’s the deal… Some people are saying she changed her shoes for comfortability. There’s nothing different about to those two pairs of shoes! The heels are the same height for the same exact shoe just different colors. It doesn’t make sense that she would need to change her shoes in the middle of an inauguration! I’m telling you right now, if you were legitimately being inaugurated in as the first lady the last thing on your mind would be changing shoes! You would be so proud and happy and enjoying your day! Melania didn’t change her shoes did she? And she walked down the entire street and all over the place that day! I’m not saying I believe that this was two separate days one way or another I’m just saying that there is a shoe change, and that would be the last thing on my mind even as a woman who does have lots of shoes that I would be thinking about on inauguration day.
I can go either way wirh this. Yes, the shoes look similar in terms of design, but having spent many years in heels, you definitely have your comfortable and practical pairs and then you have your pretty and uncomfortable pairs. On the outside they can look simillar, but the inside can be starkly different. I won't buy shoes online or from a catalogue because of this - not all pumps are created equal.
The teal pair someone mentioned looks to be satin - satin gets beat up pretty quickly so likely they are newer and/or not broken in. Even if it is not satin, that is not a common color and it is obvious it was chosen to match the outfit - again, unlikely they are worn a lot. The tan pair looks more 'everyday'.
(Melania wore some serious shoes all the time. I know few women who could handle the heels that she wore on a regular basis.)
Well, my wife often carries a spare pair of shoes if we're going to be walking a lot, or on our feet for a long time. It's just something she's always done.... so... this is probably nothing. It's something that women who are often in the public eye do.
Just for the sake of argument, what "IF" they did stage part of the inauguration? What is the implication or impact? Sure, they'd be caught in a lie, but what does it change fundamentally? I can't think of a thing it changes other than some public perceptions of Biden and the media, which are already fairly low to begin with. Anyone with a different opinion?
I think it is very important for helping to wake people up, which is what we should all still be trying to do.
You never know who the "hundredth monkey" might be but once we hit critical mass, everything changes in an instant and that is what we should focus on.
if we start from the claim "it was stage" been true.
I can only think of two things that might serve of any use (for good or bad guys).
While everybody has their eyes on the inauguration, other things are done to the people involved, that way nobody would suspect their absence.
If there was a real threat (let's say a Sniper) to the lives of some of the people involved in the inauguration, having parts of it staged would provide them security, while everybody at home thinks that it is business as usual.
This is not my ssd terious. She tried to be as glamorous as Melania but failed. Look at some videos of her walking in the blue shoes. Her feet were hurting. Her second fail was the ill fitting coat which bunched up in the back.
non-issue. Shoe change: she has her more comfortable "walking" heels (esp. on the asphalt) and then her "fancy" green (or blue whatever) heels for the event. Shoe changes for a woman is not that big of a deal, esp. with an event. Some shoes do not do well on the asphalt and you don't want to ruin them. Later on when they are walking down the street, she's back in the walking tan colored heels after changing them from the green "event" fancy heels.
I have too agree, anyone that's been Married for a time knows most women have a faddish for shoes and other accessories. Not trying to discredit the Idea of this is a Movie.... or the possibility of it being staged...
I’m convinced... that anyone who believes the shoe change is significant has never had a serious relationship with an adult female. This theory alone is easier to believe than the idea that some shoe change by Jill has pulled the curtain back on a “fake inauguration”.
I believe that Biden is a corrupt, criminal, career politician, and the uniparty machine, backed by the CCP, has installed him in the Oval Office. But I don’t think his wife’s wardrobe is part of the problem.
I also believe the change in shoes in a big "meh". I have walking to something shoes and then nicer shoes for the event. And I'm not that big into fashion, but I know what shoes I can walk well in and those that just look good.
Haha yeah. Women will suffer for a few hours and then change
She might have changed her shoes when Joe changed his diaper
was sort of thinking this not to be a naysayer but plenty of times women change shoes bc of comfort levels and other logistical things like you said walking on asphalt
My wife actually picked up on this as it happened live. She will get a kick that it has turned into a big thing.
Yeah I pretty much bring 2 pairs of shoes to any long event, like a wedding or whatever. Heels can get uncomfortable really fast and changing them out to a heel that hugs your foot differently is essential.
One regret about my wedding day is my insistence on wearing one pair of shoes the whole night (I turned my nose up to the flip-flop trend). By the end of the night I was barefoot anyway, my feet hurt so bad. Really wish I had big, blinged-out comfy flip flops for the reception!
LOL! One of my cousins who was never a fashionista about shoes, wore white hightop converse sneakers decorated with sequins and crystal. Wore them for ceremony as well as reception.
This is a good video. You can tell how dark the sky is with no sunlight shining through. But in the "official" videos there's a lot of bright direct sun lighting and the sky looks partly cloudy. https://youtu.be/--AMX2o_Icc?t=76 https://gab.com/GhostEzra/posts/105606349136391852 at 3:20 when Gaga sings
I just watched that again and compared it to the NBC stream. When Lady Gag sings it's sunshine on NBC but very overcast in the above vid.
I read that some NG confirmed the inauguration happened in the morning.
In any case very weird.
I noticed that too. Some shots there's bright sunshine, others are overcast.
Has anyone confirmed the weather in DC that day?
Made a post comparing this video to their official one: https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJxus1Gb/weather-inconsistent--inaugurati/
When Gaga starts to sing the official video switches to a shot that shows a bright, partly cloudy sky behind the capitol building. In the amateur's video we get glimpses of total cloud cover behind the building.
https://www.wunderground.com/history/daily/KDCA/date/2021-1-20
All I was able to dig up
I swear I was up at 4am watching a guy live stream outside the inauguration. I was tired and he seemed like he was gonna sleep but the weather seemed pretty gloomy and completely overcast. I’m not an expert on DC weather but to say that cleared out by then seemed odd. But what gets me is the lighting for the event is... really dramatic? Something just seemed so weird
Well better be late than never actually arrive.
I had to check it for myself, at least the shoes claim. But now I am convinced.
I think you guys should stop brushing it off as girls love shoes and look at the pictures. By your logic there should be reason to the shoe changes.... She's wearing both sets both inside and outside. Both sets walking casually down a wall. Also look at the shoes. There's no difference except the color. Those shoes r not one for looks and one for comfort. Same heel height, same front pinch.
And ya I'm a girl who loves my shoes.
Yeah my wife said that’s not a big deal change of shoes could happen for many reasons. Perhaps she wanted a more comfortable pair to get up the steps. Biggest PROOF it’s was prerecorded is Biden didn’t fuck up a single line what more do you need.
true
He did fuck up though.
I just wanna know why all those tools are walking around, outside with masks on.
Here’s the deal… Some people are saying she changed her shoes for comfortability. There’s nothing different about to those two pairs of shoes! The heels are the same height for the same exact shoe just different colors. It doesn’t make sense that she would need to change her shoes in the middle of an inauguration! I’m telling you right now, if you were legitimately being inaugurated in as the first lady the last thing on your mind would be changing shoes! You would be so proud and happy and enjoying your day! Melania didn’t change her shoes did she? And she walked down the entire street and all over the place that day! I’m not saying I believe that this was two separate days one way or another I’m just saying that there is a shoe change, and that would be the last thing on my mind even as a woman who does have lots of shoes that I would be thinking about on inauguration day.
I can go either way wirh this. Yes, the shoes look similar in terms of design, but having spent many years in heels, you definitely have your comfortable and practical pairs and then you have your pretty and uncomfortable pairs. On the outside they can look simillar, but the inside can be starkly different. I won't buy shoes online or from a catalogue because of this - not all pumps are created equal.
The teal pair someone mentioned looks to be satin - satin gets beat up pretty quickly so likely they are newer and/or not broken in. Even if it is not satin, that is not a common color and it is obvious it was chosen to match the outfit - again, unlikely they are worn a lot. The tan pair looks more 'everyday'.
(Melania wore some serious shoes all the time. I know few women who could handle the heels that she wore on a regular basis.)
You’ve got a point there, because we know Joe Biden could never live up to the shoes that Melania wore! MELANIA is gucci, Jillis,wish.com.
Ok. Great. Point proven. I like the teal ones better.
And that's why Xiden's coat jacket changed from black to blue and back to black again?
Well, my wife often carries a spare pair of shoes if we're going to be walking a lot, or on our feet for a long time. It's just something she's always done.... so... this is probably nothing. It's something that women who are often in the public eye do.
Just for the sake of argument, what "IF" they did stage part of the inauguration? What is the implication or impact? Sure, they'd be caught in a lie, but what does it change fundamentally? I can't think of a thing it changes other than some public perceptions of Biden and the media, which are already fairly low to begin with. Anyone with a different opinion?
I think it is very important for helping to wake people up, which is what we should all still be trying to do.
You never know who the "hundredth monkey" might be but once we hit critical mass, everything changes in an instant and that is what we should focus on.
if we start from the claim "it was stage" been true.
I can only think of two things that might serve of any use (for good or bad guys).
While everybody has their eyes on the inauguration, other things are done to the people involved, that way nobody would suspect their absence.
If there was a real threat (let's say a Sniper) to the lives of some of the people involved in the inauguration, having parts of it staged would provide them security, while everybody at home thinks that it is business as usual.
This is not my ssd terious. She tried to be as glamorous as Melania but failed. Look at some videos of her walking in the blue shoes. Her feet were hurting. Her second fail was the ill fitting coat which bunched up in the back.
Smart they are NOT.
There is literally a 15 minute span of time between the change. Watch the entirety of the footage for yourself and see. This is a nothing-burger