Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

493
Rand Paul says Trump impeachment case is 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' after 45 senators support his motion to declare trial unconstitutional
posted 5 years ago by Insignificant 5 years ago by Insignificant +493 / -0

The question is: will they allow evidence of election fraud to be presented?

https://www.rt.com/usa/513714-senate-lacks-impeachment-votes/

31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– nowabeliever 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

It was dead on arrival in the House. 1. It was fake charge. 2. What kind of a trial does not allow a accused NOT to be present to, well, defend himself.

Its all a kabuki show, though I still have no idea what drives it when at no time did Chucky and Turtle had the votes to convict.

Its way worse for them, TBH, its the only idiot crew in history now to try impeachment against same person TWICE, and fail BOTH TIMES. Miserably so.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– RS34ME 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

DOA is an interesting choice of words considering Leahy is now in the hospital. Just sayin’.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ArizonaDesertRat2021 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

And now Leaky Leahy is hospitalized

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Dedphoenix 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Just to be clear, he has already betrayed us. This is backpedaling

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– YugeBallsBelieveMe 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Cool beans rand

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ZerroDefex 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

Now where was your spine when those fraudulent EC votes were being certified, Rand?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Pacrosby 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

If you believe there is a plan it was likely part of the plan

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZerroDefex 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I hope so because I lost what respect I had left for him on that day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– publ1us 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

This. I think the jist is we turned the heat all the way up so all the Pepes will jump out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– pineapple_prince 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

So Romney, Murkowski, Collins, I presume. And who might the other two be?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– pineapple_prince 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Ah, Ben Sasse and Pat Toomey. Of course!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– maintaining_frame 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

The question is: will they allow evidence of election fraud to be presented?

The very simple answer is no. There is no way in hell that the DS, represented by McConnell and Schumer will allow any exculpatory evidence nor evidence of election fraud. To think otherwise indicates that we've been sleeping during the movie.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– carlodagunz 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Of course it's dead on arrival. Only 4 senators out of 100 objected to the fradulent electors. If Trump were permitted to present his case on national television, all the RINO traitors who knowingly and willfully defrauded their constituents would be left in ruins.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– imahindend 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Paul might’ve screwed us.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– unruly 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

There's no way in hell Dems would ever let any evidence of election fraud during the "trial".

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– AmericanRaised 0 points 5 years ago +0 / -0

Now they see all the pro-trump votes they will probably add an amendment to prohibit anything related to the election! But trump does a fight on that stance being they added in the first couple lines of the impeachment about the jan6th riot being started by Trump's claims of election fraud so we shall see what way this goes! Hopefully, they allow all the election fraud evidence in the trial! I still don't know how someone who isn't holding office anymore can get impeached I thought the point of impeachment was to remove someone?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– deleted 23 points 5 years ago +23 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Colt1945 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

The problem is those 75 million people don’t know... My boss who voted for trump just yesterday said to me “what election fraud” when I said to them that if this election fraud really happened there is no way we will ever have a legitimately elected president...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– maintaining_frame 11 points 5 years ago +11 / -0

That absolutely will not happen. Are you fucking kidding me? The levers of power in the senate are wielded exclusively by the cabal. Better to not have a senate trial and let Trump communicate out front on his own terms and let the military do their thing behind the scenes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Burmeister 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

exactly

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– carlodagunz 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

We don't strictly need it to proceed, but it would certainly simplify things.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– mac1221 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

I believe in order for the Senate to actually to remove a president or keep them from holding further office would require 67 Senators - 2/3 majority. Handcuffing Trump and making a public statement is what they want. But, the Dems and RINOs don't have the votes. That is why Paul can say dead on arrival. More DC theatrics since the cannot do any real work.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– JustinSonOfFidel 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

What about the lady from Hawaii who republicans have a crush on, tulsi? Is she impeaching?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– citypeople 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

She didn't run again. Is out of Washington. She seemed to hate it there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modpapa 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

She is a house rep, not a senator

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy