FILE ARCHIVE OSINT FILES FOR REVIEW BY GDSN TASKFORCE
What are OSINT files?
Open-source intelligence (OSINT) is a multi-methods (qualitative, quantitative) methodology for collecting, analyzing and making decisions about data accessible in publicly available sources to be used in an intelligence context. In the intelligence community, the term "open" refers to overt, publicly available sources (as opposed to covert or clandestine sources).
The Global Data Synchronization Network (GDSN) is an internet-based, interconnected network of interoperable data pools governed by GS1 standards. The GDSN enables companies around the globe to exchange standardized product master data with their trading partners. The GDSN is used as a tool to support high data quality through use of authoritative data sources, real-time data synchronization, and standardization of data formatting. The GDSN operates using a publish-subscribe pattern between two trading partners, each of which are registered with and access the GDSN via a data pool. The GS1 Global Registry acts as a directory to point to the data pool where data is housed, and matches subscription to registrations in order to facilitate synchronization.
They actually are stupid that's what is so funny about this thing, they embarrassed themselves and wasted a bunch of their time. Also they've given us a list of the people who are traitors to the constitution.
Lots more air than road. Essentially the challenge is slowing down the experience and making operation intuitive enough to cover the range of pilots.
With cars we can just paint lines on the road, in the sky you lose the ground speed relative sensations leaving you operating relative to other pilots and instrumentation.
When your “hit the brake!” has a full 10 second lead time things get a bit safer.
Still think the majority of humans are not capable of flying a car. The last thing I want is a flying car crashing into my yard, meaning there should be rules to avoid this. Pie in the sky stuff, thankfully it won't come to fruition.
So the question is "what are you demoncraps really hiding and afraid of"? I betcha that the POTUS Trump team knows everything - EVERYTHING and the demoncraps know they know everything. But are afraid to let the rest of the country in on the "secret" because it will totally destroy the leftist treasonous POSs in our government.
We Americans can handle the truth. The more we wait the more anti-American rules will be set upon us by the fraud that Buydin and the deep state are.
Both sides folded. Trump's lawyers could have refused to stipulate and forced a vote on each witness. It'd have been much ado about nothing, but make no mistake - BOTH republicans and democrats wanted it over today without more information coming out.
I would have brought a right big bag of the best toffee coated popcorn for that. What a show!, her stumbling through it all. Dumbs should have stuck to their story and allowed us bastards a treat.
So, Dems wanted witnesses until Repubs/Team Trump said they wanted Nancy to testify. My question is, why did the Repubs/Team Trump tell them that? Did they have to disclose witnesses before the witness part started? Did the Dems give them a list of their witnesses? Assuming that Team Trump didn't have to give a list of witnesses (possibly as many as 310) why did they let the Dems know, in advance, that they would call Nancy, let alone any other witness? Was this a message to the Dems to stand down? Everyone with more than 3 brain cells can see that Nancy would get shredded by any mildly competent lawyer. Anyone truly serious about getting her to testify wouldn't announce their intentions until they had to and if they didn't have to they are either stupid or complicit. Something about this doesn't sit right with me.
Why would President Trump's lawyers announce that they were going to subpoena Nancy Pants and then agree to not call witnesses at all, you ask? Well, have you ever watched a cat trolling a mouse? They stalk em, pounce on em, then let em go again for the fun of the chase. At least until they get tired of stalking them and just finish them off. That's what it reminded me of today.
What was on her laptop? They were going to ask her about what she knew about the pre-planned storming of the Capitol. They have the evidence.
What is this document you linked?
Not all of them. There are a pdf and two video files which are both dated February 9th.
If you go here:
https://intel.securecomm.network/
You'll see this:
What are OSINT files?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_intelligence
What is GDSN?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Data_Synchronization_Network
What does all this mean? No idea, but it's definitely interesting.
That sure as hell scared the shit out of them. Panic in DC
so then what were these FUCKTards thinking they were doing this week?
They doubling, tripling, quadrupling down
oooo like mask wearing
they are sooo predictable
Demonstrate the absurdity
They actually are stupid that's what is so funny about this thing, they embarrassed themselves and wasted a bunch of their time. Also they've given us a list of the people who are traitors to the constitution.
That is a handy list?
"These people are stupid"
Sometimes it is impossible to dumb yourself down to their level to simulate in your mind what they must have been thinking
A media performance
being fucktards lol
Of course she did.
Why does she have two sets of fake eyebrows?
u/#Spitcoffee
One for each different face???
I just noticed this.... And can now never unsee it. Thanks? Haha
I have wondered this for so long. It looks fucking awful. Probably Justin "Gay Reset" Castreau's inspiration for his shitty fake eyebrows.
They have her laptop
How can they legally bring it out in the open?
If it was confiscated by a LEO does that make it admissible in court?
I believe damn near anything’s admissible in a military tribunal!! ?
Yeah that's right!
Ya entirely... now remember these are the people deciding what to do what with all of our laws and tax money.
Remember when we thought we’d have flying cars by now? Well this is why we don’t.
That's one good thing they've done. Can you imagine the morons who drive on the roads taking to the skies, no thanks.
Lots more air than road. Essentially the challenge is slowing down the experience and making operation intuitive enough to cover the range of pilots.
With cars we can just paint lines on the road, in the sky you lose the ground speed relative sensations leaving you operating relative to other pilots and instrumentation.
When your “hit the brake!” has a full 10 second lead time things get a bit safer.
Still think the majority of humans are not capable of flying a car. The last thing I want is a flying car crashing into my yard, meaning there should be rules to avoid this. Pie in the sky stuff, thankfully it won't come to fruition.
NCSWIC! Treason for every single one of em
So the question is "what are you demoncraps really hiding and afraid of"? I betcha that the POTUS Trump team knows everything - EVERYTHING and the demoncraps know they know everything. But are afraid to let the rest of the country in on the "secret" because it will totally destroy the leftist treasonous POSs in our government. We Americans can handle the truth. The more we wait the more anti-American rules will be set upon us by the fraud that Buydin and the deep state are.
He just scared them out of their drawers. When they voted to allow witnesses it was over.
The Dems paraded their idiots up to gaand stand for days, and then folded like a cheap suit.
Only if it's recorded... :)
Wrong.
Both sides folded. Trump's lawyers could have refused to stipulate and forced a vote on each witness. It'd have been much ado about nothing, but make no mistake - BOTH republicans and democrats wanted it over today without more information coming out.
They didn't want anyone to ask her under oath why she refused to increase security.
Think mirror. We just blackmailed Nancy.
This makes me think that a more suitable arena will come out in the near future.
I would have brought a right big bag of the best toffee coated popcorn for that. What a show!, her stumbling through it all. Dumbs should have stuck to their story and allowed us bastards a treat.
They should of held off on this until after the vote
???
So, Dems wanted witnesses until Repubs/Team Trump said they wanted Nancy to testify. My question is, why did the Repubs/Team Trump tell them that? Did they have to disclose witnesses before the witness part started? Did the Dems give them a list of their witnesses? Assuming that Team Trump didn't have to give a list of witnesses (possibly as many as 310) why did they let the Dems know, in advance, that they would call Nancy, let alone any other witness? Was this a message to the Dems to stand down? Everyone with more than 3 brain cells can see that Nancy would get shredded by any mildly competent lawyer. Anyone truly serious about getting her to testify wouldn't announce their intentions until they had to and if they didn't have to they are either stupid or complicit. Something about this doesn't sit right with me.
Why would President Trump's lawyers announce that they were going to subpoena Nancy Pants and then agree to not call witnesses at all, you ask? Well, have you ever watched a cat trolling a mouse? They stalk em, pounce on em, then let em go again for the fun of the chase. At least until they get tired of stalking them and just finish them off. That's what it reminded me of today.
Witnesses? I guess since the DIMocrats lie about everything, I can imagine a witness they might have tried:
David Hogg: "I was with Maxine Waters and she never said anything about wishing Donald Trump harm."