BREAKING: RAND PAUL, Others Introduce "AMERICAN VALUES" Act To Make Communist Policies Illegal
(www.thedailyfodder.com)
Comments (62)
sorted by:
The 2A should be enough to make communist policies illegal.
I don't know why this is even a thing. How about stick to the fucking constitution or get hung up on a fucking ROPE.
Yeah but looks like all of us collectively - myself included - don't quite have the balls for that....
Not only is it not efficient, it’s worse in every single way.
Outcomes are worse. Waiting times are longer. And people in those countries pay outrageous tax rates. It’s not “free” when the government takes money out of every paycheck, whether you need it or not.
The medicine they do have is mostly created in America, and these programs couldn’t survive without American aid.
Also we defend those countries- they pay for no national defense - if Americans want better healthcare they should influence their representatives to adopt isolationist policies. Once the USA stops playing world police we can start talking healthcare. Just my 2 cents
Exactly, for example we have a ridiculous number of military installations worldwide and need to take a hard look at consolidating and closing some of them.
A small base next to a hostile foreign country is begging to be attacked. Makes me wonder if that's the whole point, to get us entangled in more foreign wars.
Don't forget DEATH PANELS
Dear Handshake,
You are butthurt. And this post is not something that would make a real patriot butthurt. You are not a patriot. u/#trump4eva
Socialism is not essential for any country, but it seems to inevitably creep into society predicated on the misbelief that it is necessary. There's a reason people from all those socialist countries you listed used to come to America to get the best surgery/care. There's also a reason why those "utopian" socialist countries can afford "free" healthcare. These countries rely on the US for all military protection and have gotten away with not paying us a thing for that security. Notice you didn't mention any shitty socialist countries like Venezuela. And on that note, why do European (and Japan) socialist countries work (as long as they spend nothing on defense), but not Latin America? Here's a clue: it has to do the crime rates (something directly linked to IQ).
JP would disagree. IQ has nothing to do with aggressive behaviour. There is literally there is no correlation. Even if it were correlation does not equate causation. Just saying like everything in life, things are way more complex than you imagine. It is like saying, women make less money than men, and is something directly related to IQ. That is nonsense. The nuances for why there is a "gap" at all are too many to quantify. Some more impactful than IQ I assure you. Everything else I agree with you.
Women do make less then men, but that doesn't have much to do with IQ since men and women have on average the same IQ. Women tend to not be as assertive and as a result don't ask for raises as often. Plus, women take more time off to raise a family. But back to IQ and criminality.
One's IQ is connected to race, ethnicity and environment. When one is developing as an infant and child: abuse, lack of nutrition, neglect, or damage to the brain can negatively impact IQ. Being breastfed and not being abused adds to a child's IQ (can positively impact IQ by one standard deviation), but the bottom line is one's IQ is limited by genetics. For example, the height of someone who ate healthy and got plenty of exercise as a child, is still limited by their genetics. Why wouldn't this also apply to mental aptitude? One can argue that crime is linked to poverty and not IQ, except in places like West Virginia where the population is white and extremely poor, the crime is relatively low. If you don't think IQ and aggression are linked, you should consider visiting a prison sometime.
I'm not saying every low IQ individual is prone to crime or that there aren't smart people from all races and ethnicities. These are averages. There is a bell curve as JP has explained in the past. Interesting topic one could go on and on about. I recommend looking up the IQ of different countries then compare them to their crime rate. I understand that many of these low IQ-high crime rate countries don't have access to the best food/use violence to discipline children which negatively impacts their IQ. Plus, many of the smartest people migrate to nicer countries which lowers the averages.
Unfortunately for those who wish to deny IQ (sometimes known as ‘G’ for general intelligence) is real, the data and the science continue to pile up against such beliefs. In fact, studies repeatedly confirm the reality of IQ and the connections between a variety of both positive and negative life outcomes and intelligence. Not only do studies of the general population support the reality of IQ, but even studies specifically conducted inside prison systems confirm those claims.
For example, studies consistently reflect the fact that chronic or repeat criminal offenders have a lower average IQ than non-offenders. This is true among both juvenile repeat offenders (who average about 92) and adult repeat offenders (who average about 85). IQ tests are normed for a populace to 100. Every few years the tests are re-normed due to IQ drift, which tends to be upwards (commonly referred to as the ‘Flynn effect’). The 15 point difference between the norm for the general population and that of chronic offending adults is known as 1 standard deviation.
More evidence comes from a study conducted in the Texas prison system which found that more than 20% of criminal offenders had an IQ below 80. IQ’s at such a level begin to seriously impede a person’s chances at life success and it is thought that a life of crime then becomes an alternative (dangerous and risky) path for such persons. Additionally, those who have IQ scores around 80 and below have significant problems in balancing short-term vs long-term desires. This is sometimes referred to as the ability to delay gratification and is related to time-preference (‘I want what I want and I want it now by any means necessary’ vs ‘I want X but will work slowly, methodically, and legally or morally to attain it’).
This is not, however, to say that those of moderate to high IQ do not commit crimes. The presumption here is that those of higher IQ tend to commit crimes which they are able to conceal or are harder to detect for a host of reasons. Still yet, chronic offenders do tend to be involved in far more physical crimes: burglary, assault and battery, car-jacking, drunk-driving accidents, homicides, and the like. Much of this is supported in the study linked below:
http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/crime/intelligence-and-crime/3/
The problem is that the true definition of communism is not commonly understood. It is synonymous with wealth redistribution amoung the uneducated libs and leftist.
This act is to counter CCPS policies of abortion and sterilization.
How about Rand Paul NOT CERTIFY A CHINESE ELECTION IN America to put his money where his idealistic mouth is?
We are being played. These politicians are self serving. This 3and Paul should not be given the time of day or night. These are political attention whores: Rand Paul, Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz.. Lindsey Graham is a fucking fairy of a little daisy who're in the field of fags.
I am tired of giving these false idols any attention.
Any senator / Congressperson that wasn't newly elected bringing these things forward when they know that, now that they have the minority, they won't pass should immediately be cast out from office
I mean; didn't Paul vote to certify the coup results?
You are right; ALL OF THEM ARE FAKE, SATANIC, LIARS.
ALL of them.
Ted Cruz went on his rant a while ago where he exposed himself....
Spot on, fren; they are all the same.
Rand has consistently been one of the strongest America First politicians in DC. Rand Paul is who led the senate against the impeachment vote.
They're the opposition party so they know they don't have any ability to pass anything even if they truly wanted to, so they can talk as big of a game as they want now for donations and constituent clout.
Exactly
Oh and my husband says "Rand Paul is just the new Trey Gowdy" .
Yeah, where is that traitor? Still at Fox cashing in while we suffer with the covid coup d'economitard?
Exactly.
Seems like you don't hear much from gowdy....he's cashing in; doing the revolving door from govt. to private sector / quasi-governmental jobs.
How about they do this when it actually could get passed? GOP is in trouble and now they are pandering, but they are done. I don't care what they try to get passed. It means nothing as long as we don't have a majority. Same old crap.
"Oh look at us. We're so good. We are trying to fight against this."
YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS WHEN WE HAD THE HOUSE, THE SENATE, AND THE PRESIDENCY.
Grrrrr I can't stand being pandered to.
it's just the cycle they go through. dems or republicans, doesn't matter -- when you get in the minority, you propose all this these things you know won't pass, so that you look like you're taking a brave stand for your side's core values. then people vote you into the majoriy where you can then begin sitting on your ass and doling out other excuses for why you didn't circle back to all that stuff you fought for, meanwhile the opposing party which is now in the minority starts putting up all THEIR heroic convictions bills that they know won't pass, so that they can then have their turn as the stagnant majority, and on and on and on
It's disgusting to me. I'm so sick of this controlled opposition New World Order game.
Oh, you mean like it already is?
50 U.S. Code § 842
Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations
The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.]
(Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 886, § 3, 68 Stat. 776.)
The corporate u.s. doesn't care about such things.
Enforce the Communist Control Act!
Oh look more pandering after memory holing election fraud. Let’s see how many people fall for this theater.
I'll take "Things Republicans only propose when they haven't a snowball's chance in hell of passing for $200", Alex.
Communist values are supposed to be illegal already
How does anyrhing rhese frauds introduce matter other than to pander to, what they hope, is left of their base
What happened to "muh principals"? He wouldn't vote to give funds to the border wall. He wouldn't vote to audit the election. Sorry if this offends you, but fuck Rand. This is nothing but a publicity stunt.
Talking heads, where were they when it really mattered. We do not want to be entertained by what should have been.
I swear he comes here. I've been saying we need to do this for years! All evidence shows communism is disastrous to lives and economies, no exceptions yet
Dudes a pussy seen it for myself. Wants us to sign some petition on our 2nd amendment rights, after you sign the petition, it immediately takes you to the mooch page. Hey pussy, I’ve been using all my extra money to purchase ammo. It’s for protecting all my liberties.
u/#Vincenut
This used to be the general rule
I find it horrific that we need to beg for American Values via these ACTS. You know what also has Acts? PLAYS and Magical ILLUSIONS. This is real life and we have a Constitution to protect our American Values. Why don't we try actually FOLLOWING the CONSTITUTION?
That's a nice sentiment from him.
Yes, outlaw that shit.
i do think Rand is a Patriot, but understand people's concerns. can't speak to some of his actions but hopefully they're inline with our desired outcome. i say we have much bigger fish to fry before busting on Rand. we need 95%+ of all of DC drained. any patriot there that even slightly helps the white hat agenda should be used as an asset where possible
I disagree. Turning on our own side that betrayed us and the Constitution is the highest priority.
We expect the other side to fuck us. We don't have that same expectation of our own people.
Traitors deserve the worst response.
Remove the traitors from office and figure the rest out later. Don't need to be backstabbed so many times just because we conveniently forget all their bad when they do something "right"
No dude. Rand Paul is the one who led the senate to vote against impeachment.