borrowed this from gab
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Time to buy stock in rope manufacturers!
That would be cannabis companies.
100% American made Hemp!
Cannabis goooooood!
Ammo is a safer investment, it can be used on any Criminal!
They're BEGGING for it!
It's actually kind of humorous.
Sodom & Gomorrah
Have sex with?
You mean rape.
It was passed in Sept. 2020 -- Plainly stated, "This law permits a judge to determine whether a man should be forced to register as a sex offender if he had voluntary intercourse with a minor aged between 14 and 17 and was no more than 10 years older than that minor. Newsom and Wiener must explain why a law which would allow a 24-year old man to have “voluntary” sex with a 14-year old and evade the sex offender registry is anything other than a victory for those who wish to have sex with children."
https://townhall.com/columnists/ianhaworth/2020/09/14/false-equality--sb145-places-more-children-at-risk-n2576144
So basically if their human traffickers or customers get picked up they'll be fine due to their compromised judge. If you're competition for the deep state and stepping on their turf you'll get the book thrown at you.
It's reprehensible and absurd and we will not let it go unchallenged.
Sickos
California....why am I not surprised..
That makes sense...NOT! Sick fuxx!
Evil
Not going to be sad if it breaks away from the rest of America and sinks into the ocean.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be turning in her grave that she never managed to live to see it!
Wasn't she the one who tried to get the age of consent lowered to 12?
THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK & NEED TO BE LOCKED UP FOR LIFE ALREADY!!
If North Korea wants to nuke us, please let them target LA or San Francisco.
Not an accurate description. Exaggeration weakens our case.
What happens when people of a state are apathetic to who they vote in office?
Cant bitch about what they had no interest in preventing in the first place. All it takes is 30 minutes of a voters time to do some quick research on those running for office: a citizens duty is to know who you're voting for.
No one voted these assholes in.
Logical Fallacy.
People had to vote, as the illusion cannot be maintained without it. Whether or not those votes were legit is another matter entirely.
This isn't the law. There is a higher age (14) but for flipping sake, why is it a 10 year gap? I can see some kids who are 18 maybe dating a 15 year old and being on the cusp of the law and then have to go to court to ascertain if that was their thing or they actually fell in "love" A 24 year should be no where near a 14 year old as that is the law limit. 3 year gap at most and 16 or 17 the lowest age. I don't care about who you love but age limits should be smaller. No adult should be desiring children. This law should change and the chaff will be seperated. Time for sick people to grow up and have healthy adult sexual relationships or none at all. You can't be trusted with people at all.
This is a shit post right...!?
When will Cali "suffer" the "big one" and be broken off form the mainland???
I think it's time now, God. Can we make this happen please?
The citizens of California have to fight back now!! That is disgusting!!
SB 384 already allowed people to get away with sex crimes. This is just California's priorities being retarded, once again.
It’s also not completely true. It’s not 11 year olds. It’s 14-17, within a certain range, and was written to include oral, anal, & digital sex, when previously only vaginal sex was covered under the law in this way. It doesn’t okay it. It gives the judge leeway to sentence them as a sex offender for life.
NOT that I’m taking up for it- bc I am not.
But this is written to make us look stupid.
The reason only P-in-V was included the first time was because the original bill was passed so that a FATHER could be spared being on the sex offender list (if he was close in age) and therefore be able to have access to his child. It was purely a parental rights issue. Then the faggot state senator from SF decided he wanted to not get in trouble for diddling kids and used "progressive equality" to push his agenda. Same guy that made it legal to give aids knowingly.
I don’t doubt that at all, though it is extremely disgusting.
My point was this bill does not excuse people having sex with 11, 12, or 13 year olds.
That was my only point- that it was not completely factual. So if anyone wants to use it in an argument- make sure you understand the facts and don’t let yourself get blindsided.
On the exact same note, I am very glad you pointed out what you did. That is important context if the discussion ever comes up
Yes, it does only change to give a judge discretion if someone is added to the registry. At least currently the penalties still stay the same, but a 24 yo could have sex with a 14 yo and not be added to this list now, for any sex when it was previously only normal sex. We also need to remember the slippery slope that this is another step in that direction. It just adds more clutter to the law for predators to hide behind.