Serious question. What do these companies have to gain from pushing what is less than 1% of the population? Who is behind these decisions and what is the end goal? Is one person making all the choices at the company and everyone else follows because they have to? Why would you destroy your company?
They're trying to pivot to a new demographic. Not sure what that demographic is but I'm sure they will come out and tell us. And it's bound to be a large and wealthy for this move to make sense.
At the same time, they're trying to dump the dwindling number of men who still used to buy their magazine before this point. Why? Because I guess men are bad or their money is no good. Who know.
Eeeewwww look at the shoulder spread on that person. And how much airbrushing did they do to that photo? You can dress it up and airbrush it all you want to, but it’s clear it’s a man. I don’t care what anybody says this is just an abomination to the Lord.
If there is a way to audit their books, that would be interesting. They pretend this woke insanity is popular but what if it is all a lie? What if the average Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue sells, I don’t know, 10 million copies, and then the tranny issue only sells 10,000. Could there be a way to prove fraudulent business practices of some kind? Would shareholders have any standing to question these actions? And then what if all these other companies have the same data? If a Hollywood studio is continuously losing money on woke propaganda, does that not imply some kind of other influence at work? Because why would a company do that? Why would all of them do it in coordination? Is there a way to prove intent here? It’s like if a restaurant started charging 10 million dollars for a straw, and then one client kept purchasing these 10 million dollar straws, wouldn’t that be flagged for money laundering? They wouldn’t be able to say they are just straw collectors and this is how they value the craftsmanship and artistry of the straw maker and actually it is the cops who are the crazy ones for being suspicious.
Yeah I mean between this, Hollywood losing viewers, news ratings all being down, etc etc. And then you got Tucker hitting records high for standing with Trump but all of the other stations continue to go fervently against him while losing ratings. Wild.
Now I know why Michelle Obama is retiring.
He cant compete with this guy.
I’ll only buy Sports Illustrated if the model is black, Asian, trans and obese.
I forgot disabled. ?♂️
Does cutting his dick off make him disabled? I think he may meet that criteria.
I’ll settle on differently challenged.
You're rational. They're not.
not me, needs to also be disabled.
They also state they have "curvy" models for your viewing pleasure...I'm sure you guys can't wait for them! RIP sports illustrated....
Libs fuck up everything.
Serious question. What do these companies have to gain from pushing what is less than 1% of the population? Who is behind these decisions and what is the end goal? Is one person making all the choices at the company and everyone else follows because they have to? Why would you destroy your company?
One has to ask how these insane trannies gained so much power to begin with that they can be screwing up the world for everyone else now.
Could it be that one was in WH for 8 years?
He doesn't look Asian ... at all.
He identifies as half asian bigot.sheesh.
“Homelessness” = “couch surfing” people casually toss that phrase around.
Sorry to say... for most, when they know it is a man, it makes one sick...:(
I miss when "transhumanism" just meant becoming a cyborg.
Well a cyborg implies an improvement but with the trannies it is a huge step back.
If you are still buying SI, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Meet sports illustrated's first black, asian, muslim, transgender, paraplegic, bisexual, obese, gay, blind, deaf, mute, mother, model! -April 2024
"Curvy Models", yeah guys who like fat chicks already have BBW magazines.
Hello, Photoshop!
They're trying to pivot to a new demographic. Not sure what that demographic is but I'm sure they will come out and tell us. And it's bound to be a large and wealthy for this move to make sense.
At the same time, they're trying to dump the dwindling number of men who still used to buy their magazine before this point. Why? Because I guess men are bad or their money is no good. Who know.
That picture is so photoshopped to hide that he's a guy...
How well did this work out for Playboy, are they even still a thing?
Eeeewwww look at the shoulder spread on that person. And how much airbrushing did they do to that photo? You can dress it up and airbrush it all you want to, but it’s clear it’s a man. I don’t care what anybody says this is just an abomination to the Lord.
Sick absurdity. Tired yet? No, then let's do this for a bit longer.
All this transgender crap is straight from the devil himself. God help us please.
This is intentional. They want us to boycott everything so they can systematically destroy all American culture. They want to strip us of everything
I need eye bleach.
If there is a way to audit their books, that would be interesting. They pretend this woke insanity is popular but what if it is all a lie? What if the average Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue sells, I don’t know, 10 million copies, and then the tranny issue only sells 10,000. Could there be a way to prove fraudulent business practices of some kind? Would shareholders have any standing to question these actions? And then what if all these other companies have the same data? If a Hollywood studio is continuously losing money on woke propaganda, does that not imply some kind of other influence at work? Because why would a company do that? Why would all of them do it in coordination? Is there a way to prove intent here? It’s like if a restaurant started charging 10 million dollars for a straw, and then one client kept purchasing these 10 million dollar straws, wouldn’t that be flagged for money laundering? They wouldn’t be able to say they are just straw collectors and this is how they value the craftsmanship and artistry of the straw maker and actually it is the cops who are the crazy ones for being suspicious.
Yeah I mean between this, Hollywood losing viewers, news ratings all being down, etc etc. And then you got Tucker hitting records high for standing with Trump but all of the other stations continue to go fervently against him while losing ratings. Wild.
Before the election, Tucker legit was setting cable news records. It wasn't until after the Nov. 3 betrayal that his ratings fell.
Yeah. I'm not getting a magazine just to look at a half-naked man of color pretending to be a woman..