This is not a doomer post im just trying to stop this myth.
Guys please listen. The booms are real and the interview was real. I stared at it for half an hour when it came out initially believing it was fake.
The booms come in from the bottom of the frame and move with such rapid ease that our initial reaction is that they must be close to the foreground and small like a handheld microphone, which is why they would look a bit blurry and out of focus. They're blurry because of video compression, and the source video is of such high quality that you can easily see that there was no blur on the booms. Very crisp. If you watch the black one closely you can see that it gets SHADED by Biden as it passes under his hand. Finally, if the video was layered in editing, then they would have had to rotoscope layers for bidens hand to go over the mic and then another for bidens torso for the mics to go over Biden. If it were edited, why would they do that? They wouldn't need to go to all that work to fake a video, they would just need three layers. If it was faked--in order to look like how it does--a video editor would have had to split bidens layer into two on purpose to intentionally put his hand over.
The simple truth is that it was an optical trick.
Im not trying to be contrarian or spread misinformation. This is a very real video and we need to be honest to each other about it.
You sir, are living in a dream world.
That is clearly either a green screened President, OR, super-imposed microphones.
The real question is WHY
CNN entered the chat
<nod> ...It must suck as a paid troll when you get the call, and realize that you have to "out" yourself now, meaning that your sweet spook gig is almost over.
If the microphones are the ONLY layer then how the fuck is biden on top of it?
Yep Good point, so Biden was green screened.
Then why does the top of his head disappear? ?♀️
Because it's a green screen
I agree. Fake resident!
yes... why? i am sure the video happened at some point ... in some place ... but why was it modified?
I respect you sticking your neck out and posting what you believe, even if it's not the popular or "fun" view. I have my graphics team analyzing it to give me a concrete answer, but their first response was that the video appears to be not only manipulated, but poorly manipulated.
So in layman's terms, that means what?
That it was intentionally bad. A confirmation to anons and a red pill for the normies.
OR it could be the DS getting the sheep used to the ideas of deep fakes, so that when vids of their crimes come to light they can cry "DEEP FAKE! NOT REAL!"
(Supposedly the white hats use analog for confessions just to prevent that possiblity.)
Oh...come on man!
Is the dress black and blue, or white and gold?
Our eyes, combined with technology, can definitely play tricks. To deny that is foolish. I’m not prone to take a hard stance either way...but it does look odd.
blue and black.
My questions are "what changes in our world if we prove to ourselves that it was manipulated", "what changes in our world if we prove to ourselves that it was not manipulated"?
There has been an awful lot of effort and emotion expended on this video this afternoon, just wondering why it makes a difference either way?
Because THIS PROVES SOMETHING!!! - Me Originally.
Thank you, I too watched it over and over, and went frame by frame at one point trying to figure out what was going on. I too concluded the same as you
The top of his head disappears. Strange.
He has white hair and the exposure of the camera blew out the white levels of the his hair and the sky.
To me it appeared that it was just because both the sky and the top of his head/hair were very bright. They just matched each other
Did you see this one? https://mobile.twitter.com/minopinions/status/1369834190297038848?s=21
Yes that one his head does appear to be cropping off without explanation. But this outdoor video with the boom mics seems to be because of a “hotspot” from where the cameras maximum brightness limit is
That one is more damning, but the video is highly compressed, so when he passes the wall with a similar color to his hair, it disappears. I’d like to see the source footage for this before believing it.
As a fellow video editor and compositor, I came to the same conclusion, but declined to comment on the stickied post when I should have said something. The point you made about having to add another layer means it being faked makes no sense since they would have to put more work in to make it look fake. The mics look proportionally wrong unless you are familiar with boom mics and “blimps.” I think everyone should wait for a more thorough analysis before jumping to the conclusion it’s green screen.
It is best to keep people confused between what is real and imaginary. That way, they are easier to control and they focus their attention on issues that are a distraction from something more important.
OPs technical analysis.
Oh Im sorry did you examine the video with your asshole instead of your eyes, wiseguy?
Lol
Kek ?
i find it amazing how many people are trying so hard to convince us the video is real... why do we need your input when we can make up our mind?! isnt that the purpose of this site is to do our own research and come up with our own conclusions? not to be force fed by others
Did anyone notice that everyone had on winter coats and hats except him? I don't know if the grass and trees are green there yet, but it was clearly cold.
An optical trick replicated with two different angles?
It's really funny how all these new accounts pushing the vaccine are also pushing that the video is real.
ATTACK OF THE SHILLS. Brought to you by Shilly McShillface and his merry band of reeeetards.
I have been on this site for over 8 months. I got my old account deleted for saying the truth. I just don't want us to waste time on fake news
Sure. You were literally calling on us to get the vaccine. You aren't going to last long on this account either if you keep that up.