GREEN SCREEN DEBUNKED (For the last time hopefully...)
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Really trying hard to hold my laugh whenever I see these stupid debunks.
op picture proves op is wrong.
OP is moron
This from a guy I sided with when he was getting brigaded by these same clowns...
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkr9ZbeM/those-complaining-about-citizenj/
Way to go Mike...
i didnt reconize your name, but it doesnt matter because you're wrong this time.
No, I'm not. How stupid would they have to be to get every image and video this detailed and this wrong? It would be easier to have actors in a press pool and dub in what Biden said than to fake all of this shit. This ridiculous nonsense is why Q anons are called Qtards.
Ooopsie...you just blew your cover.
See you in a few weeks under your new account I guess.
You will be easy to spot...because youre a bit dumb
Blew it how? By wanting us to be better than this?
When you say "us"....Are you referring to us "Qanons"? or us "Qtards"?
Some here happily accept derogatory labels. You've only been here 7 days longer than I have, you should know that. But if you drive away the casuals with silly green screen conspiracies such as this, no one will awaken. People that are excessively insisting it's a green screen when presented counter arguments are starting to glow for me. I'm very particular about what I up vote and it's not this green screen garbage by people that couldn't operate a DSLR if their lives depended on it.
sorry i was rude but dude, why did cspan change the video to cover up his hands?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?509926-1/president-plans-visit-southern-border
You mean cover it enough to still show the mic behind his hand???
no, they added the banner on the video so you cant see the errors anymore
But I can still see his hand pass in front of the microphone... What other possibly "error" could they be covering? Why would CSPAN bother given the abundance of video's in circulation?
good question. why would they hide it?
If placing a banner on video's is standard fair for CSPAN, then differ to Occam's razor.
I think you are confusing yourself.
The microphone in the pic is BEHIND his hand.
No people think it should be in front of his hand. I'm saying it's not.
This clip is the best quality one Ive found showing both angles synced up.
https://streamable.com/4m5xli
Notice how far away the light grey mic is on 1st clip. Then watch his hand go in front of the mic on the 2nd clip.
This screengrab from the vid makes it so clear even a blind man could see it. The light grey "dead cat" mic cannot be directly behind bidens hand, and at the same time be several feet off to the left side.
https://files.catbox.moe/cxpkke.jpg
That clip on top seals it.
I sent OP the pic. The dead cat is in front of Quid Pro Joe. Don't let your brain get infected with leftism with their silly debunks. https://twitter.com/AngelaFergie75/status/1372385504126136322?s=20
Tell me why would they go to such lengths to fake multiple video's and pictures and get EVERY FUCKING ONE OF THEM WRONG??? Because they're not wrong, you don't know WTF you're talking about.
Because patriots are in control and they want to make it obvious that you are watching a movie. Stop finding excuses for MSM, these are weak debunks.
I was convinced this was fake at first. However, with these shots I am not so sure. Just like with the inauguration, where we had multiple layers looking focused on by the cameras, it causes things to not look right. Looking at the angles in these pictures though, I think there is nothing wrong with them.
If I take out what I expect to see with the naked eye, and then think of it like when I'm looking through my wife's super expensive camera, I think this is what I would see.
For instance, in the top picture (red arrow) the first pic shows it clearly behind and to the left. The second pic looks like its in front and to the left. This can be explained by the multiple focus effect in 2D.
The bottom picture (blue arrow) the first pic looks like it has moved up a little bit from the top pics. The second blue arrow pic looks pretty much exactly what you would expect from such a movement if the top pic was in fact behind, and not in front as the focus effect makes it seem.
There is no such thing as "multiple focus effect" in 2D/3D/5D.
Watch the synced up video clip I provided. Scrub the video back and forth to see the dead cat existing in 2 different places at the same time.
I wont bother going into the other errors in the video.. such as mismatched sharpness/contrast, floating feet, and an obvious 'halo effect' around biden which is an artifact leftover from the digital green screen/rotoscoping process. https://www.videomaker.com/forum/topic/having-trouble-with-green-screen-setup-and-haloglow
The human eye focuses on a single point in space. More specifically, it focuses on a specific distance. Its depth of field is very small. A good camera can have a much larger depth of field because it can restrict certain light rays from passing through the lens (aperture control). This is what I called a "multiple focus effect in 2D" for the sake of brevity.
Indeed, this is exactly what has caused confusion in several of these "fake" videos (the inauguration e.g.). I think that is what is causing the issue here as well.
Please do, because in the "higher res" videos (as opposed to a couple very low res versions I saw) I am not seeing that. Please point these effects out to me (where they are, timestamp, etc.).
Depth of field effect is called "Depth of Field effect" unsurprisingly.
DOF doesnt produce the multiple visible errors in the clips.
Provide a high res clip (at least HD 720p) and I might walk you through it. The original clips posted online by official sources were both potato quality so you have me intrigued.
But honestly someone that thinks "multiple focus effect" is a thing probably isnt going to understand much.
I'm an engineer with a degree in physics and an amateur photographer. I'll manage.
I used the term I used to explain to people who would have no idea what DOF was how both the microphone and Biden's hands could appear in focus despite them being on multiple (2D) layers.
Lets try to play nice please.
I can't quite put my finger on it but the whole thing looks so odd. Like the microphone are big so they appear closer to the lens, but then Biden walks right up to them and it seems like they are in the wrong place, it feels out of place. I think this is the problem with trying to analyze it because, it is our instincts that really take in what reality is supposed to look like. When we try to analyze it intellectually it just muddies it
Uncanny valley, they use the term when referencing bad cgi all the time. Our brains just know something is off, all the elements are there, but its just not right.
Stop beating a dead cat.
good one
The “microphone” on the left looks more like a puddle on the walkway. It also appears to be behind him, not in front. Also, the perspective is off: in the right the microphone appears quite large, larger than the black one. On your left picture it appears about the same size as the black one even though it is closer to the camera.
Qlueless
No, I'm not. How stupid would they have to be to get every image and video this detailed and this wrong? It would be easier to have actors in a press pool and dub in what Biden said than to fake all of this shit. This ridiculous nonsense is why Q anons are called Qtards.
AllMostThere
"This ridiculous nonsense is why Q anons are called Qtards."
Ooopsie...you just blew your cover.
See you in a few weeks under your new account I guess.
You will be easy to spot...because youre a bit dumb
Qlueless
Blew it how? By wanting us to be better than this?
AllMostThere
When you say "us"....Are you referring to us "Qanons"? or us "Qtards"?
Qlueless
Some here happily accept derogatory labels. You've only been here 7 days longer than I have, you should know that. But if you drive away the casuals with silly green screen conspiracies such as this, no one will awaken. People that are excessively insisting it's a green screen when presented counter arguments are starting to glow for me. I'm very particular about what I up vote and it's not this green screen garbage by people that couldn't operate a DSLR if their lives depended on it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i4RTXVYL/lin-wood-goes-full-q-tard/c/
AllMostThere will remain on my blocklist. Don't fcking comment in my posts again.
That red text on top looks like engrish to me. Debooookned round eye!
OP ur right, i'm convinced the truth is actually crazier, Biden confirmed he was working for Q just 2 days after this.
So my opinion with this mic shenanigans is that there is no CGI involved at all..........but it is deliberately filmed just to make it look fake, this is all staged by Q just to mess with people and do a bit of trolling. Look how perfectly the camera slowly zooms in on Biden giving us the perfect illusion that he moved closer, when he hadn't. (P.S. not to mention the ninja in the background that no one notices)
That's because your instincts and intuition told you it was fake, but then you spent 20 minutes concocting a way to explain it in your mind. Just watch the original video. It looks like a scene from Roger Rabbit.
Also because he was primed to watch for the hand going through the mike at a particular time. Very common, that's about the only way that clip is framed no matter where you find it online.
But the info from multiple video angles makes it unlikely it's a green screen, no?
I was absolutely not primed to see anything the first time I watched it. I noticed it before I knew what to look for.
ETA: After the first time, it just gets worse. Something looks off. It’s unnatural. It even looks like Xiden slides forward after he quits walking. Those other things I may have been looking for.
I first saw the video on another website and do not wish to say where. I read up on focus breathing real quick and that is a possibility. There are still things that are not natural and I am not used to seeing in videos. This video, in my mind, has undoubtedly been altered.
The second video doesn't explain anything. If the mic was so far away from him, why does it appear Biden's arm goes over top of it in the first angle. ...?
To me you watch the original video and it looks OFF. I think once you go in and start trying to break it down like this you are just confusing yourself. When you are looking at someone in your kitchen and they move, their arms don't go over shit the way Biden's did, it looks fake. Coming up with extra angles is just confusing yourself by overanalysis.
Fair enough. I will give you that the lens can definitely play tricks with our view of things. But you know, I've watched TV all my life and I've never seen something like that. Just haven't. If you could come and show me a dozen different clips of peoples hands hovering over objects that seems so out of place, I'll concede that maybe I just never noticed before. But as it stands, when I look at that clip it looks FAKE to me. And the clip posted by another person here that shows the two angles side by side seals it for me as well.
Trust your instinct. https://twitter.com/AngelaFergie75/status/1372385504126136322?s=20
Nope. He had the exact same posture at the 12th second of the ABC clip. Dead cat still in the front and the lady in black was still in the background on the pic. To have the dead cat creep up on his back means he's literally touching the reporter's knee in the pic.