Point being... the trends last night have normies looking... due to the msm and hbo, vice and other's "QAnon" stuff. We have a significant opportunity ahead of us and at present... get it together and give it your utmost.
How to downvote it ?
**
First of fucking all:** u/justice_will_prevail:THERE ARE NO QAnon, THERE ARE ONLY Q & ANONS.
And "code of ethics" ?! Really ? Are we google or other evil corporation now ? XD
Ethical people not need code of ethics, ethical people do what is fucking right.
"We protect the unprotected"/"We are freedom" - how many leftists or normies did you redpilled today ?
"We are immune to propaganda" XD - nobody really is and those slogan proves just the opposite in your case XD
"We have access to everything" XD - really ? Maybe after you learn about pixelknot and other things Q mentioned. If you have access for example to Kappy files repost,repost and repost for the god's sake.
many of us do not have time to correct/redo older images. Feel free.
I posted an old image. The post title does say Q and Anons. The basic point remains the same. Some interest will be generated and is likely to bring newbie normies to Q and we Anons.
Funny, I loved this graphic when I first saw it and still do, but half the people are hung up on that search term. Everyone should know that "qanon" is just the doggerel Hebrew word for "canon".
I don't really like it, it's a little pompous sounding in certain spots. But it looks cool and has some good ideas in it. I just don't like the tone of it in several areas.
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
Q Post 3905, 28 March 2020
A person(s) value:
vote
monetary value (tax contribution)
Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
[1] remains a variable
[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That's news to me.
I knew there is a "Q" and there are "Anons"... but QAnon was a fabrication of the main stream media to lump people into a specific category for means of attacking them.
Also, I don't follow anybody's supposed code of ethics. That's just a way of broadcasting your beliefs in a way that leaves you completely open to attack by enemies. The only code I believe in is... WE ARE. We will become whatever we need to become in order to succeed in correcting the problems. :>)
Don't cave to the MSM. First explain there is no such thing as Qanon. Then you can say what you want, but don't let them control the narrative. NO QANON!
Scratch the QAnon part. Make it just "The Anon Code of Ethics." Or, "Q Associated Anon Code of Ethics." "QAnon" is a wholly MSM/Clown creation. A fictional entity. Don't feed into that madness by legitimizing it with this meme.
There is no Qanon!!! Only Q and anons
Point being... the trends last night have normies looking... due to the msm and hbo, vice and other's "QAnon" stuff. We have a significant opportunity ahead of us and at present... get it together and give it your utmost.
Why are we "Qanon" now? Aren't we anons? We work with/for Q.
Q and Anon... many of us do not have time to correct/redo older images. Feel free.
You lost me at QAnon
How to downvote it ? ** First of fucking all:** u/justice_will_prevail: THERE ARE NO QAnon, THERE ARE ONLY Q & ANONS.
And "code of ethics" ?! Really ? Are we google or other evil corporation now ? XD
Ethical people not need code of ethics, ethical people do what is fucking right.
"We protect the unprotected"/"We are freedom" - how many leftists or normies did you redpilled today ?
"We are immune to propaganda" XD - nobody really is and those slogan proves just the opposite in your case XD
"We have access to everything" XD - really ? Maybe after you learn about pixelknot and other things Q mentioned. If you have access for example to Kappy files repost,repost and repost for the god's sake.
So what are you doing except shitposting ?
I saw those goodle searches statistics you gave. Shall I say what those statistics mean again ?: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hl5GxyUu/search-terms-google-trend-pics-l/ If it has similar statistics to "shaman" we are doing it wrong,we are doing not enough
This is many hours late but go into settings, turn off community styling, and refresh the page. That will allow you to downvote.
Like what you did here, very well done.
However I'm reminded over and over again....
So call it the "Q Code of Ethics". There should almost be an emoji or symbol that could be associated with the codebof ethics.
Instead of using "we", use "anons" and on the bottom say like:
QSA - "Qunited States of America"
Putting Q & United together, grammatically & phonetically have a nice ring.
QSA!
As you wish... just capitalize on the trends.
Qanon is a mainstream media term used to conflate anon discussion posts (And more than likely inserted/planted negative/crazy bullshit) with q.
Q posted on the chans and eventually 8kun. Anons discuss them, there is no Qanon
I posted an old image. The post title does say Q and Anons. The basic point remains the same. Some interest will be generated and is likely to bring newbie normies to Q and we Anons.
Upvote if you think I should make up my own graphic to simplify the 17 Orders for Digital Soldiers.
Funny, I loved this graphic when I first saw it and still do, but half the people are hung up on that search term. Everyone should know that "qanon" is just the doggerel Hebrew word for "canon".
Go for it, Those are all great threads.
I don't really like it, it's a little pompous sounding in certain spots. But it looks cool and has some good ideas in it. I just don't like the tone of it in several areas.
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
Q Post 3905, 28 March 2020 A person(s) value:
vote
monetary value (tax contribution)
Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
[1] remains a variable
[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q
It should say “we are anons”, otherwise you are confirming the narrative of Qanon and supporting the effort to distort what Q is.
So... there IS a QAnon?
That's news to me. I knew there is a "Q" and there are "Anons"... but QAnon was a fabrication of the main stream media to lump people into a specific category for means of attacking them.
Also, I don't follow anybody's supposed code of ethics. That's just a way of broadcasting your beliefs in a way that leaves you completely open to attack by enemies. The only code I believe in is... WE ARE. We will become whatever we need to become in order to succeed in correcting the problems. :>)
Don't cave to the MSM. First explain there is no such thing as Qanon. Then you can say what you want, but don't let them control the narrative. NO QANON!
We are saviors : save the children
I think this would look better if there was a / between Q and anon. Q/Anon separating the two different entities.
Feel free, just do not miss the opportunity before us.
Scratch the QAnon part. Make it just "The Anon Code of Ethics." Or, "Q Associated Anon Code of Ethics." "QAnon" is a wholly MSM/Clown creation. A fictional entity. Don't feed into that madness by legitimizing it with this meme.