18
posted ago by godfreedompatriot ago by godfreedompatriot +20 / -2

I keep hearing stories of people waking up. Where are they?

Comments (30)
sorted by:
7
Edge 7 points ago +8 / -1

Most are content to just lurk I imagine. Signing up and participating might get them put on a list. Everyone's afraid of the list.

3
1776Nurse 3 points ago +4 / -1

For me I'm not afraid of a list. I'm sure I'm on tons. I just didn't feel competent enough to participate. I've been following Q for over a year now but didn't feel like my contributions would be meaningful. So instead I lurked in the shadows.

3
Factfiler 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same here. I'm fortunate as a boomer to say I've lived my life and am OK if i end up at a FEMA camp, because not speaking out and sharing on a platform like this is not an option for me. I was hooked when great awakening on Reddit first started and after enduring voat hell, am ecstatic to be here.

1
Edge 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm very bad at researching and digging. All I can really do is offer my input on things. But I'm happy to be here, with a group of people that "get it".

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
godfreedompatriot [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fair enough, it's just odd, especially when people say we outnumber the normies. Are they all on Facebook? This board seems to be the main hub.

1
OiDubb 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve asked myself the same question. Mathematically I’d say it’s probably a slight echo chamber, go to Reddit talk what we understand to be true and come back and talk about the ratio.

6
damnsonq 6 points ago +6 / -0

i was a long time lurker before i started liking and posting. trust me there is a massive silent majority

4
CrimsonSentinal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Since a certain someone left I've dialed back the upvotes to mainly upvoting comments and not threads themselves. You really have to light my pants on fire to get me to upvote a thread. And/or I'll leave a comment - constructive or otherwise - takes the place of my upvote.

We are here, we are silent. There are many.

3
LIBERTYanon 3 points ago +3 / -0

its hard for them to take it all in

2
TheConservationist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are there other Q-specific boards/forums? Thought I had seen a comment which suggested there were others that were more populated. I just happened to land on this one via referral.

As for waking up, that might take many different forms, and I'd assume quite often doesn't explicitly tie to Q. People can be red pilled without ending up somewhere like here.

2
Stumpycake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there a specific post that you feel needs to have over 1k upvotes?

0
godfreedompatriot [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't know, anything? I remember a while back, someone said "Upvote this if..." and then something universally agreed upon by this board. It hit right below 1K. That was the highest post I've ever seen here.

I would just like to have an idea of how many pedes here are actually active.

2
Stumpycake 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. There's plenty of great content on this site that I wish could get more credit. My best advice to you would be to upvote the content that you strongly agree with and try not to worry about popularity in the short term.

2
Retaining_H2O 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because if you have more than 1,000... then we become mainstream.

We prefer to by 'mysterious' and 'controversial' and 'edgy'... so we stay below that 1,000 threshold.

2
Factfiler 2 points ago +2 / -0

There have been a few over 1000, but not many.

1
ToxicLibertyism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably because the up vote arrows here are so damn small, and a pain in the ass to use.

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe it's done the same way our individual upvotes are tallied: individually up to 1K, then changes to 1.1k, 1.2k, etc.?

1
Shockadee 1 point ago +1 / -0

They probably don't know we are here and elsewhere

1
ilovetrump4 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are often too many duplicate posts that dilute the count that could have been obtained if the topic had only been posted once.

0
Muscleup12 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't know but there is no leadership or organization after esvpra left, we need a new mod or someone that will sticky shit at least, I'd do it since I've been on here and contributed for awhile but I'm not sure how the mod elections work lol

2
TheConservationist 2 points ago +2 / -0

SpeakEasy & NessInOnett seem pretty active these days, with posts, comments and the such.

I'm either less familiar with the others, or, they do more in the background.

As for mod elections, Evspra once posted a comment about mods being selected by pre-existing mods. I imagine they have to be careful who they give that sort of power to.

4
ZerroDefex 4 points ago +4 / -0

Especially after the way Evspra left.

0
joeno 0 points ago +3 / -3

Better question would be why are all the top upvoted posts from two months ago if this thing is going in the right direction.

4
TheConservationist 4 points ago +4 / -0

My guess: Not moving fast enough to keep people coming/interested/believing.

0
joeno 0 points ago +1 / -1

Also a lot hype for January 20th that did not materialize. And no new Q posts.

3
TheConservationist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed, that didn't help. Things like that are probably in large part why "datefagging" is discouraged.

2
flopperdog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not all people who wake up believe Q stuff.

I mostly believe in McInerney/Lin Wood.

I don't believe that upvotes on GAW is a reliable barometer of whether people are waking up

1
ZerroDefex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah look at X22 Report for example, he gets thousands of views on Rumble and occasionally quotes Q but judging from the comments many people viewing him don't frequent this forum or even know of it.

-1
godfreedompatriot [S] -1 points ago +2 / -3

Exactly